It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Obama administration's opening bid on Thursday in negotiations to avert a year-end fiscal crunch included a demand for new stimulus spending and authority to unilaterally raise the U.S. borrowing ceiling, a Republican congressional aide said.
Originally posted by Iwinder
Wonderful idea I am off to shop till I drop and then when we get the bill with 26 % interest tacked on I am sure to drop big time.
Thanks for bringing this information to the table and it is very worrisome to say the least.
Regards, Iwinder
Originally posted by muzzleflash
I owe my brother 30$.
Thats plenty of debt for me, Im still worried about paying that measly sum back.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by muzzleflash
I owe my brother 30$.
Thats plenty of debt for me, Im still worried about paying that measly sum back.
Heck, I try to pay cash with everything. You should see the looks I get just by doing that!
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by beezzer
Why do people think that raising the debt ceiling = spending?
I don't really understand. The Debt Ceiling is symbolic, it does not mean automatic spending. It just means that the government has now the option of spending said money in the budget as approved by Congress.
NOT raising the debt ceiling is effectively holding your economy hostage and is NONSENSE to anybody who understands economic policy and who is of moral and sound mind.
Yes cut spending, yes raise revenue. Don't allow the US to default on debt because it's politicians are TOO STUPID to do anything else.
~Tenth
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by beezzer
Why do people think that raising the debt ceiling = spending?
I don't really understand. The Debt Ceiling is symbolic, it does not mean automatic spending. It just means that the government has now the option of spending said money in the budget as approved by Congress.
NOT raising the debt ceiling is effectively holding your economy hostage and is NONSENSE to anybody who understands economic policy and who is of moral and sound mind.
Yes cut spending, yes raise revenue. Don't allow the US to default on debt because it's politicians are TOO STUPID to do anything else.
~Tenth
It appears to me that what we are seeing is a rise in spending. A rise in taxes. Am I missing something here?
Why do people think that raising the debt ceiling = spending?
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Obama is not asking for the ability spend without limit. I know it must be hard to read with your new eyepatch, but I'm sure you can comprehend the real context of the proposal....not the political rhetoric.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by beezzer
What?
A tax increase is a raise in revenue, not a raise in spending. When you give a tax CUT to people, you are reducing revenue and effectively increasing spending.
A tax cut is really a tax spend.
They don't explain it that way. Your country cannot afford tax cuts. You have the largest debt ever accrued in the history of the world, yet you all pay some of the lowest tax rates in the world. Do you see how that's a problem?
The fact is that the American people allowed their government to spend the US into bankruptcy, and now you are going to have to pay the piper for your apathy and general lack of interest in what's going on over the last 30 years.
Your cuts should come from entitlement programs and defense. Mostly defense, since you all have a standing army to combat an idea, which is nonsense as well, but that's another thread.
~Tenth
Millions of workers will see their take-home pay rise during 2011 because the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 provides a two percentage point payroll tax cut for employees, reducing their Social Security tax withholding rate from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent of wages paid. This reduced Social Security withholding will have no effect on the employee’s future Social Security benefits.