It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
reply to post by NavyDoc
Ok i see where the miscommunication comes from.
Instead of the word cancer, replace it with tumor.
Cancer now apparently only means malignant tumor, where as benign means non malignant tumor.
Its easy to get the words wrong when virtually all media uses the word cancer as an eqivalent for all tumors.
You got me there on a minor semantic issue, but isnt the benign tumor still a result of apoptosis failure?
edit on 30-11-2012 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)
A large number of small adipocytes surrounded by CD34+/lectin- ASCs and increased numbers of Ki67+/CD34+ ASCs indicated enhanced adipogenesis in lipoma compared with normal adipose tissue. In contrast, cellular apoptosis was not enhanced in lipoma, suggesting that the enlargement of lipoma tissue may be due to a positive balance of adipocyte turnover (accelerated adipogenesis combined with nonenhanced apoptosis).
Originally posted by marg6043
It is a stupidity, as a women I see this and what this women is showing the rest of the world and specially young girls as an example.
Cancer is about prevention, keeping our bodies healthy and able to fight the disease before it gets out of hand, no taking away body parts to prevent it what is next, taking the uterus because possible uterine cancer? how about vaginal cancer? Ovarian cancer?
Let just hack our bodies in the name of what may happen, right?
Cancer can affect anybody in any part of the body regardless, prevention is about keeping the body healthy so the body can fight back.
We produce Cancer cells all the time, but our bodies fight back as is mean to fight and kill those cells, we all have the chances of having cancer as we already do.
ALL OF US ARE PRONE TO CANCER. YOUR BODY PRODUCES CANCER CELLS DAILY.
Understanding Cancer,Cancer does not develop for some unknown reason. Once you understand why and how it develops, and learn how to support your body so that it may more effectively fight cancer, it may never be too late to get healthy again. (No matter what type, they have the same underlying causes.) Cancer is a natural process where, to put it simply, an overworked and weakened immune system cannot kill it as fast as it is multiplying. Toxin, carcinogens, radiation, even viruses, combined with an unhealthy internal environment , and in conjunction with a weakened immune system, cause more cells to turn cancerous, and allows them to thrive.
A very small percentage of cells in every person who has ever lived turn cancerous. And the body usually gets rid of those cancerous cells before they do harm. This process has been going on for eons. It is only when more cancer cells are being created than the body can get rid of that the problem comes. With increased toxins, viruses, carcinogens, etc. our immune systems have become significantly overworked and weakened
www.angelfire.com...
Our Body Cures Cancer Every Single Day
ezinearticles.com...
Please enlighten us on your direct experience with cancer.
Originally posted by Seektruthalways1
And this woman who says she will remove her breasts cause 'it runs in her family' or whatever argument she is using, I believe is complete stupidity and ignorance.
Great...please enlighten us on your direct experience with cancer.
Originally posted by Seektruthalways1
I will speak for myself, I have only my own experience to what I am going to say.
Originally posted by newsoul
Originally posted by rickymouse
It is just a tactic to justify the silicone implants she wants. Next year she will be back bigger and better than before with a breast cancer awareness speech. Sounds like a publicity stunt to me. I want to feel them when she is done to make sure that she hasn't deceived us.
I think I'm going to vomit. Are you freaking serious?? Do you really think that after a mastectomy women have bigger and better breasts?? Well let me tell you what it is like. I was diagnosed with breast cancer last year, it was in my right breast. Because of my FAMILY HISTORY I had both of my breasts removed. After the 6 months of agonizing torture to stretch my skin and muscles, I got my implants. I have a 3 inch scar in the middle of both of my "breasts", I do not have nipples.....it's beautiful, really you should see them
No one in the world would have their breasts removed because they think they will look better after the surgery. Did you know that when a person has a mastectomy that means nipples and all. They dig all of the breast tissue out of your body, up to your collar bone and under your arms. Try getting an implant that covers that area and tell me how pretty it looks. Fool
I can't help but note that much of the ridicule of this tragic circumstance appears to be coming from men. Would this be the same particular demographic that generally wants to dictate what women do with their bodies? I'm guessin' so. War on women, indeed!
Originally posted by PrplHrt
reply to post by Seektruthalways1
I'd say it's a personal choice and, therefore, no one's business but the patient's. Family history, high risk. It's her decision as to whether or not she wants to address it now or later.
Originally posted by GreenGlassDoor
I don't mean to be crude, but she could have done more for cancer research by raising money through
posing topless in a calendar than looking like cancer's victim. If a Miss America contestant has no hope what chances do those of lesser influence have?
I am 100% certain that if the US had a Manhattan-style project for cancer screening, prevention, and treatment it would be a disease that goes the way of polio.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
reply to post by SLAYER69
You cant justify a medical procedure merely because of anecdotal evidence ( a story ).
What caused the cancer in those people? Not resolved.
How can we assume hereditary from pure coincidence?
We need more data, way more data.
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by troubleshooter
I have to agree with you, and I have researched the statistics, or actually lack of statistics that are pertinent quite a bit. Cancer rates are way up. Deaths from cancer remain about the same. Trouble is that death after getting cancer is not technically from the cancer itself anymore so the cause of death is something else that is damaged by the treatment for the cancer. It could be listed as heart failure, or possibly liver failure. The treatment is extremely invasive to the organs and tissue of the body. This artificially keeps the death rate statistics down. Someone who died six months after the cancer is removed is not technically dying of cancer. There is no cancer left in the body.
The hospitals do not like to keep patients in the hospital long after any surgery. They kick you out a lot of times even if you are not doing good. This keeps the death rate of the hospital down and artificially makes the hospital look like it has a better success rate. Make the figures look good, that is the name of the game. Nothing about honesty in this, it works hand and hand with reducing costs for the insurance companies. If you stayed a few more days sometimes it would increase your chances of never coming back. The problem now is that exposure to MRSA is a real problem. I see no solution to this problem.
I disagree...the forum is Medical Issues, and there is an astounding amount of ignorance being displayed in this thread. Hopefully a few posters have learned little something.
Originally posted by amraks
this topic belongs in some womens weekly magazine. Purely gossip.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by davjan4
I'm taking D3, from health store, 8-10 1000 iu's a day. And a special magnesium powder with other ingredients, its specially for fibromalgia but good for rheumatoid too. I've read that 50 a day, works for breast cancer in studies and am wondering if there is a better way to take this.
It also produces calcium in your body, however the magnesium and or k2 is needed to prevent kidney stones and loss of that calcium.
I guess I may need to find the liquid form of it somewhere.
www.vitamindfoundation.org...edit on 1-12-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)