It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That is a statement of an average.
Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
That is a statement of an average.
No, it is an estimate.
We find annual mass loss estimates of the Greenland ice sheet in the range of 191±23 Gt yr−1 to 240±28 Gt yr−1 for the period October 2003 to March 2008. These results are in good agreement with several other studies of the Greenlandice sheet mass balance, based on different remote-sensing techniques.
Every item of information comes from the most recent and reputable scientific sources and published dialogues. As citations would impede the text, and as most may be looked up on the web, we decided not to fill the text with them.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by steve1709
Not calling your info incorrect, I really don't know.
But the disclaimer at the bottom of the page leaves one less than confident about it's validity:
Every item of information comes from the most recent and reputable scientific sources and published dialogues. As citations would impede the text, and as most may be looked up on the web, we decided not to fill the text with them.
They don't bother listing them at the bottom of the page either.
It's all on the web, go look it up for yourself.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by steve1709
Not calling your info incorrect, I really don't know.
But the disclaimer at the bottom of the page leaves one less than confident about it's validity:
Every item of information comes from the most recent and reputable scientific sources and published dialogues. As citations would impede the text, and as most may be looked up on the web, we decided not to fill the text with them.
They don't bother listing them at the bottom of the page either.
It's all on the web, go look it up for yourself.
it was found that a tax would be the best way to go in the long run. since businesses work on bs, it would be prudent of them to find better practices so that their bottom line isn't compromised.
Originally posted by steve1709
reply to post by mee30
Where's the evidence? Look it up yourself!
studies were done by people that are much smarter than me and may I hazard a guess, much smarter than you and came out with papers showing that a carbon tax is better than other model.
sick of flogging a dead horse over this.
Ultimately, concerns about Earth's fate would be better focused on slow-acting problems such as climate change rather than some sort of cosmic catastrophe, said Andrew Fraknoi, an astronomer at Foothill College in California.
Greenland and Antarctica 'have lost four trillion tonnes of ice' in 20 years
• Landmark study by global team of scientists published
• Finds melting polar ice has led to 11mm rise in sea level
• Greenland losing ice five times faster than early 1990s
Ian Joughin, another member of the team, of University of Washington, Seattle, said: "Climate change is likely to accelerate ice loss greatly." He added significant challenges remained in predicting ice melting, due to the complexity of the interactions between the warming air and oceans and the great ice sheets and glaciers. "In Greenland, we are seeing really dramatic losses in ice, but it is still uncertain if it will slow, stay the same or accelerate further."
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by steve1709
reply to post by mee30
Where's the evidence? Look it up yourself!
studies were done by people that are much smarter than me and may I hazard a guess, much smarter than you and came out with papers showing that a carbon tax is better than other model.
sick of flogging a dead horse over this.
That is hardly a denial of ignorance. "Look it up yourself" is the antithesis of denying ignorance.
But to comment on your claim of these smart people....I would love to know what these people's intentions are. its that whole "figures don't lie, but liars can figure".
Originally posted by lazernation
Ian Joughin, another member of the team, of University of Washington, Seattle, said: "Climate change is likely to accelerate ice loss greatly." He added significant challenges remained in predicting ice melting, due to the complexity of the interactions between the warming air and oceans and the great ice sheets and glaciers. "In Greenland, we are seeing really dramatic losses in ice, but it is still uncertain if it will slow, stay the same or accelerate further."
He doesn't mention a possible increase in ice cover. Is this completely ruled out by scientists? Seems like nobody even thinks that it's a possibility.