It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I have noticed from my perspective in life that the mind does not think in terms of right and wrong.
The researchers found that these two measures of egalitarian preferences were significantly associated with activations in the insular cortex, but not with the vmPFC.
This particular result is a potentially profound one as the insular cortex is also the part of the brain that processes the relationship of the individual with respect to her or his environment. In other words, egalitarian behavior may not exist in isolation, neurologically speaking, but, rather, be part of a larger process that stems from altruism and a sense of the larger social good.
Adam Smith, in "The Theory of Moral Sentiments", expressed this perspective in his 18th-century essay.
"Adam Smith contended that moral sentiments like egalitarianism derived from a 'fellow-feeling' that would increase with our level of sympathy for others, predicting not merely aversion to inequity, but also our propensity to engage in egalitarian behaviors," the researchers wrote. "The evidence here supports such an interpretation -- our results suggest that it is the brain mechanisms involved in experiencing the emotional and social states of self and others that appear to be driving egalitarian behaviors. This conclusion is consistent with a broader view of the insular cortex as a neural substrate that processes the relationship of the individual with respect to his or her environment."
Originally posted by Ralphy
When people choose not to do something because they think it is wrong, they are not realizing they are choosing not to do something because of guilt. The mind sees the actions bringing guilt and chooses not to do the action. What if something was considered wrong and you didn't feel it guilt about it? wouldn't you be more inclined to do the action regardless of whether it is considered right or wrong?edit on 27-11-2012 by Ralphy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by chadderson
reply to post by Ralphy
Have you asked yourself why guilt exists? It is a tool that exists so humankind may LEARN. Guilt exists because human beings are AWARE and possess hindsight and foresight. To accept anything that comes our way in life is to submit to our creator, to our higher power. To try and take matters into our own hands and exercise "free will" is nothing more than going against the grain, in which one will either feel guilt and learn a lesson or cease to be. This is the reason civilization crumbles when it reaches a certain point, because the majority of it is not accepting fate, but trying to create their own destiny. This is the reason government does not work. This is the reason for many of the global problems today.edit on 27-11-2012 by chadderson because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by troubleshooter
reply to post by Ralphy
That is the human condition.
How we should act toward others is not inate so must be regulated by external law.
Originally posted by Ralphy
Originally posted by troubleshooter
reply to post by Ralphy
That is the human condition.
How we should act toward others is not inate so must be regulated by external law.
The problem with having an external law is that everyone has the ability to perceive it differently. What is right and wrong varies between cultures, religions, etc. Who has the authority to make a claim of absolute morality? Some may say God but who gave a person the authority to make that claim? With that mentality, morality still differs due to perception of different gods and rules.
Morality is relative, even a claim to absolute morality is still relative to ones perception of it.