It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by korath
I wonder what kind of outrage and candle light vigil would have been held if he got shot breaking into one of their homes.
Originally posted by milominderbinder
this was not trespassing, this was breaking and entering.
No. It wasn't "breaking and entering". It's ALLEGEDLY breaking and entering based solely upon the verbal testimony of the guy who was hiding bodies in his basement.
She added that her cousin, who had undergone treatment for substance abuse, could have been after pills from the home.
There are simply no commonly found street drugs that would produce this sort of behavior. Moreover, this is the about the fourth time I've heard somebody offhandedly state "well...they must have been on drugs" excuse. The article states that one of them had a little problem with prescription meds...but so did Brett Farve and Rush Limbaugh.
Originally posted by minniesoda
they were no longer a threat to him after he shot them the first time....he then executed them
then not reporting it to the police....something is not right with this story
Originally posted by PvtHudson
Originally posted by PatrickGarrow17
Ok, they shouldn't have robbed the house.
They still didn't deserve to die.
I'm going to go ahead and assume nobody has invaded your home in the night.
Originally posted by PatrickGarrow17
Ok, they shouldn't have robbed the house.
They still didn't deserve to die.
There's no good answer on this. The shooter was probably within his rights, I'm not going to blame guns. But I actually got caught burglarizing a house when I was 16, and six years later consider myself to be a pretty good citizen. I would like to become even more productive and ethical. Many people come out of a rebellious late teens phase and do good things in the world.
Some sympathy is appropriate.
ETA: Now after reading the link...my mind has changed. The homeowner seems to have not been within his rights. His crime was far worse than two teenagers breaking and entering, and he should spend time in jail. Perhaps even the rest of his life, as he is 64.
When police arrived at his home after reports of suspicious activity, Smith, 64, confessed to shooting the teenagers repeatedly and stashing their bodies after they broke into his home, authorities said. On Monday, he was charged with second-degree murder and police revealed he told them he fired more shots than necessary after his gun jammed and Kifer laughed at him.
Plus, this guy seemingly killed them out of anger, and not defense.
this was not trespassing, this was breaking and entering. there is a difference.
trespassing is like walking across someones propriety or being somewhere uninvited,
breaking and entering is just that, they broke in with the intent of steeling from this man.
well i think anybody that's been convicted of the crime would, seeing how your trying to justify yourself. fact is you are a lucky P O S if you are a convicted felon, no matter what your age was. just because you may have fallen out of the pattern of being a repeat thief like most who go in and out of jail.
apparently the police agreed, i'm sure they investigated the claim. and there is no mention that police found evidence contrary of his statement. fact is that police seem to back his story.
She added that her cousin, who had undergone treatment for substance abuse, could have been after pills from the home.
see that above, i bet you anything that was what these two were after, they were junkies looking to steel pill or stuff to get money for more.
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
reply to post by PatrickGarrow17
Plus, this guy seemingly killed them out of anger, and not defense.
It's his property, he could have killed them just because he didn't like the color of their shoes.
Originally posted by ToneDeaf
Originally posted by sepermeru
I don't believe they broke into his house. I believe that it was a family visit -- I believe one of them was his cousin -- for the holiday that went horribly wrong because this man is clearly mentally ill. Massive overkill and self-defense are not the same, the whole bit about the girl "laughing" at him after already having been shot s just freaking creepy and suspicious, and the fact that he hid the bodies so as not to bother the police on Thanksgiving? I can't believe anybody is taking this guy's story at face value.
I can believe people are having a great time being internet tough guys at the merest hint of a chance, though. That part definitely rings true.
Something about this 'story' isn't quite right.
His house seems rundown, so why would they need
to break a window to get in ?
Wouldn't burglars just kick-in the flimsy door rather than
risk getting cutup by broken glass ?
Would they not have knocked on the door first to
see if anyone was home, before breaking in ?
Breaking windows seems more of a harassment tactic,
. . . or a cover-up.
But then, having his home broken in so many times,
it would be only natural for the old guy to be paranoid etc.
_______________
___________________
Originally posted by milominderbinder
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
reply to post by PatrickGarrow17
Plus, this guy seemingly killed them out of anger, and not defense.
It's his property, he could have killed them just because he didn't like the color of their shoes.
Ummm...actually...that's false.
Murder is illegal on everybody's land.
LOL