Disclosure of the moon landing hoax.

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

The main problem with saying that the Apollo footage was slowed down for play back to try and mimic the moon's gravity, is, as I showed earlier with a video, the Apollo 14 pendulum.

Replicating it by slowing down the video will not work, as the timing does not ever match.

It's not due to air resistance, because the force of that resistance on that small of an object moving at such a slow speed (as compared to say a jet liner or even a car) is negligible.

Gravity, on the other hand, is a constant force being applied to any object, be it in motion or at rest.

The amount of gravitational acceleration on the moon's surface is only 1.62519 m/s^2, where as on the Earth it's 9.8 m/s^2.

This means that here on Earth, the gravitational force being applied is greater, there for it will slow the motion of the belt much faster.

You can see that just fine in the demonstration video. Each time the pendulum here on Earth will stop swinging well before the one in the Apollo 14 video. No mater how you try to speed up or slow down the video.

I've seen all sorts of excuses ranging from "green screening" to "they had a motor on it", none of which will work or make any sense at all.

You Apollo Believers are intentionally avoiding your responsibilities.

During the Apollo 11, there was a suspicious fire in the transmitter.

A fire leads to a change of plan:

The personnel at Tidbinbilla, under the directorship of Don Grey, were looking forward to receiving the historic television of the EVA. Unfortunately for Tidbinbilla, a fire in the transmitter just one day into the mission on 18 July altered the plan drastically. Source www.parkes.atnf.csiro.au...

During Apollo 11, there was a suspicious explosion of television equipment which was supervised by Dick Nafzger. Listen to the Dick Nafzger interview where he described the unusual circumstances of his television equipment explosion/fire... and his equipment was in Syndey, Australia. Source www.honeysucklecreek.net...

So that is two different locations in Australia, during Apollo 11, and two different incidents of "spontaneous equipment explosion" -- let's call it SEE. Sierra Echo Echo.

Shout out to all Apollo Reviewers out there in conspiracy land!

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

Nope. These are experienced military jet fighter pilots. They are trained to use the phonetic alphabet. They do not say such things as "FCE to AUX, what's that?"

You are fighting a losing battle here, OBM.

a reply to: eriktheawful

The main problem with saying that the Apollo footage was slowed down for play back to try and mimic the moon's gravity,

Hi eriktheawful,

Dick Nafzger gave a great interview here where he explained the process of slow can television convertors and he also gave us some very interesting anecdotes about the strange explosion of SSTV equipment in Sydney, Australia, just days before Apollo 11, and he described how new replacement equipment was flown in from the manufacturer in North America.
www.honeysucklecreek.net...

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

Nope. These are experienced military jet fighter pilots. They are trained to use the phonetic alphabet. They do not say such things as "FCE to AUX, what's that?"

You are fighting a losing battle here, OBM.

comms asked for SCE to aux NOT sierra charlie echo to auxiliary. the correct reply is SCE to auxiliary

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

Nope. These are experienced military jet fighter pilots. They are trained to use the phonetic alphabet. They do not say such things as "FCE to AUX, what's that?"

You are fighting a losing battle here, OBM.

Sounds to me your grasping at straws if this somehow proves anything. Test pilots regulary talk in the clear as they say. But hey maybe Nixon was in charge and confused out astonauts he was somehow involved I'm sure lol

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

Nope. These are experienced military jet fighter pilots. They are trained to use the phonetic alphabet. They do not say such things as "FCE to AUX, what's that?"

You are fighting a losing battle here, OBM.

comms asked for SCE to aux NOT sierra charlie echo to auxiliary. the correct reply is SCE to auxiliary

BS. All fighter pilots know the phonetic alphabet. Pete Conrad is reading from a script.

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

Nope. These are experienced military jet fighter pilots. They are trained to use the phonetic alphabet. They do not say such things as "FCE to AUX, what's that?"

You are fighting a losing battle here, OBM.

comms asked for SCE to aux NOT sierra charlie echo to auxiliary. the correct reply is SCE to auxiliary

BS. All fighter pilots know the phonetic alphabet. Pete Conrad is reading from a script.

Really any proof of that no thought not. Test pilots in emergencies DO NOT USE PHONETICS. It takes to long and they have to work quickly. Go listen to some test pilots some time there on u tube

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

Nope. These are experienced military jet fighter pilots. They are trained to use the phonetic alphabet. They do not say such things as "FCE to AUX, what's that?"

You are fighting a losing battle here, OBM.

Sounds to me your grasping at straws if this somehow proves anything. Test pilots regulary talk in the clear ad they say. But hey maybe Nixon wad in charge and confused out astonauts he was somehow involved I'm sure lol

The crew of Apollo 12 sat in Richard Nixon's White House movie theatre watching a movie "Marooned".
www.imdb.com...

Have you seen it? Richard Nixon has seen it. Pete Conrad has seen it. Dick Gordon has seen it. Alan Bean has seen it.

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

Nope. These are experienced military jet fighter pilots. They are trained to use the phonetic alphabet. They do not say such things as "FCE to AUX, what's that?"

You are fighting a losing battle here, OBM.

comms asked for SCE to aux NOT sierra charlie echo to auxiliary. the correct reply is SCE to auxiliary

BS. All fighter pilots know the phonetic alphabet. Pete Conrad is reading from a script.

yes they do know it.. but the phonetic alphabet was not asked for by comms.. conrad replied as comms requested..

if comms request sierra charlie echo to aux conrad would have repliad sierra charlie echo to aux..

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

Nope. These are experienced military jet fighter pilots. They are trained to use the phonetic alphabet. They do not say such things as "FCE to AUX, what's that?"

You are fighting a losing battle here, OBM.

Sounds to me your grasping at straws if this somehow proves anything. Test pilots regulary talk in the clear ad they say. But hey maybe Nixon wad in charge and confused out astonauts he was somehow involved I'm sure lol

The crew of Apollo 12 sat in Richard Nixon's White House movie theatre watching a movie "Marooned".
www.imdb.com...

Have you seen it? Richard Nixon has seen it. Pete Conrad has seen it. Dick Gordon has seen it. Alan Bean has seen it.

Well my god they watched a movie about astronauts when they visited the white house shocker. Maybe it was out of relief Nixon had a speech ready in case they died odd thing to do if it was faked thoigh. In it he talked about reaching the moon and the bravery of astronauts. Why would he have a speech made if it wad just a script?? Oh wait Mayne he didn't know what was going to happen because it was live. You really need help Nixon didn't have any control over missions and you know it.

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Apart from where they use it: "Mark one Charlie".

They had an emergency. SCE was quicker to say.

Nope. These are experienced military jet fighter pilots. They are trained to use the phonetic alphabet. They do not say such things as "FCE to AUX, what's that?"

You are fighting a losing battle here, OBM.

comms asked for SCE to aux NOT sierra charlie echo to auxiliary. the correct reply is SCE to auxiliary

BS. All fighter pilots know the phonetic alphabet. Pete Conrad is reading from a script.

Really any proof of that no thought not. Test pilots in emergencies DO NOT USE PHONETICS. It takes to long and they have to work quickly. Go listen to some test pilots some time there on u tube

BS. When the communication channel is noisy, even in ground-to-ground communications, people use phonetics. What takes longer saying "Fox Charlie Echo" or "FCE" and you should please explain how you would react under the same circumstances if you don't know that your ground control is saying "SCE" or "FCE" or "NCE".

Ground control says "SAM CHARLIE ECHO TO AUX"
Conrad says "SAM CHARLIE ECHO TO AUX, COPY"

But the script was written so that there was a little confusion after the lightning strike and all telemetry was lost. Remember pal, all the telemetry was off-line until your buddy,, Alan Bean, pressed the "SCE to AUX" button. Heck, Dick Gordon was the CMP even he didn't know what button to push in an emergency!

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Classic you make a claim of a script without any proof. If it was scripted id bet they wouldn't have made a mistake since they would have plenty of time to edit it. There is people in movies could easily have re shot the scene if Need be oh that's right it was live and happeneing. As I said go listen to test pilots In an emergency they aren't taking the time to spell jack. In fact go listen to combat pilots in combat again no spelling alot of screaming but no spellling. Oh and the telemetry wasn't lost by the way it just didn't make any sense. Computer was spurring out random numbers thus panicked the astonauts they were flying blind.

a reply to: dragonridr

Oh wait Mayne he didn't know what was going to happen because it was live. You really need help Nixon didn't have any control over missions and you know it.

I think you should put things into a little bigger perspective. I am not saying that your opinions are wrong because we are all entitled to our opinions.

The Apollo 11 "moon" landings happened on the same weekend that Teddy Kennedy drove his car into a pond an innocent girl named Mary Jo Kopechne drowned.

You have focussed your entire attention on the NASA narrative and that is your prerogative. What I am asking you to consider is that there is an alternative narrative, the Nixon narrative, and that the Apollo 11 "moon" landing was orchestrated, by Richard Nixon, as a publicity stunt, and that the murder of young lady on the same weekend as the first moon mission really deserves greater attention. en.wikipedia.org...

What a spectacular weekend!


Apollo lands on the "moon", everybody sees it on TV, everybody believes it.
Edward Kennedy is involved in a suspicious accident on the same weekend.

If you really want to know the truth --- how about you look at the Secret Service diaries of where Richard Nixon travelled to and from on the weekend of the Apollo 11 mission.

This thread has reached 400 pages and you have done nothing to stop the flow of Apollo Disclosures. The Apollo Reviewers are taking control of the narrative and there isn't much that you can do about it. We know about Nixon's first term. We know about the Russian Glass Ceiling. We know about the Frank Borman special mission to Russia in early June 1969.

We know that Stanley Kubrick was consulted by NASA in the mid 1960's.

We know that Walt Disney was involved with promoting the Nazi rocket agenda in coordination with Wernher von Braun.

We know that Thomas Baron and his family were conveniently parked at a train crossing when a train suddenly went by.
en.wikipedia.org...

We know why James Webb quit NASA before Apollo 8.

We know that Gus Grissom's family doesn't agree with the final report of the Apollo 1 fire, which Frank Borman supervised and finalized.

We know that Richard Nixon appointed a Mormon scientist to NASA administrator who supervised the Space Shuttle development which kept the United States in low earth orbit for 45 years.

We know that the Apollo astronauts carried personal radiation dosimeters and that several of those PRD's malfunctioned.

We know that the Apollo 12 crew didn't take any pictures of themselves while they were going to the moon. There are simply no pictures available. Go figure.

We know that some Apollo astronauts have auctioned their personal effects for personal financial gain.

We know that Apollo 15 crew members where severely reprimanded for attempting to make money off Apollo envelopes.

We know that nobody goes over 475km in space altitude.

We know that the Committee to Re-Elect the President (CREEP) was run by Richard Nixon's little brother, Ed Nixon, who coincidentally, was a geologist with two degrees, but he couldn't find a job in geology.


We know that Ed Nixon was not qualified to be a geologist in the NASA moon landing program because NASA recruited the Egyptian born Farouk El-Baz to take over that role, and this is because Ed Nixon took a job as recruiter at Bellcomm, and we also know that Bellcomm was the primary planning contractor for NASA in the Apollo program.

And we know that KREEP rocks were returned from the "moon".
en.wikipedia.org...

Perhaps the scientists where trying to tell us something when they first created the new geological acronym, Kreep.

And when Richard Nixon's little brother is appointed to a position in the CREEP it is worthy of recognition in the Apollo narratives. That is all I am saying. The Nixon/Apollo connections are not coincidence. The Apollo Reviewers will embrace these basic facts. The Apollo Believers will cry many tears.

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Well you know what else happened that day??78,000 attend Newport Jazz Festival, Newport, RI. No wait this has to prove apollo is a fake you ready David Bowie releases "Space Oddity" . See when you have to expand a conspiracy theory to the point of being ludicrous you might want to put some thought into your probably wromg. Than you pul the Nixon posters off your wall and go seek help.

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Well you know what else happened that day??78,000 attend Newport Jazz Festival, Newport, RI. No wait this has to prove apollo is a fake you ready David Bowie releases "Space Oddity" . See when you have to expand a conspiracy theory to the point of being ludicrous you might want to put some thought into your probably wromg. Than you pul the Nixon posters off your wall and go seek help.

Ed Nixon had two degrees in geology. He couldn't find a job in geology. Ed Nixon goes to Bellcomm, the planning sub-contractor for NASA in the Apollo program. Do you agree or disagree?

While working at Bellcomm as a hiring manager, Ed Nixon hires Farouk El-Baz for the NASA Apollo program, because El-Baz is a geologist.

Very funny, the NASA narrative looks really weak when the real facts are out. How can you say that Richard Nixon had nothing to do with Apollo when it is shown the connection to Ed and Farouk?

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
This thread has reached 400 pages and you have done nothing to stop the flow of Apollo Disclosures.

]

Exactly what "Apollo Disclosures" would they be?

All we actually have is a few people with not much understanding of science, physics and the way things actually work trying to claim Apollo was hoaxed, but failing miserably. Perhaps if they went away and learnt some physics and science they would not post garbage here? But that is unlikely, as they are just not interested in the facts.

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

A hiring manager hires a geologist to do geology. What sort of ridiculous notion is that?

Last reply on that matter. I have a new personal moderation policy: Any post that mentions any of the Nixons will be ignored as off-topic and to prevent thread drift.