Disclosure of the moon landing hoax.

reply to post by DJW001


Why won't you name the unnamed astronaut? Which one of the Apollo 12 crew snapped AS12-50-7362? And which 1 of the 5 windows in the Apollo 12 command module was "clean" enough to snap the "super clean" 7362 image that OBMonkey has been talking about?

Zaphod58
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

 

And you've proven that he actually did say that right? Because he said it to more than one person right?

Carol Rosin has said in front of the whole wide world (on youtube) that she would testify under oath before Congress. Oswald said he was a patsy in front of the whole wide world, broadcast on TV. Oswald was then murdered on live TV. Richard Nixon talked to astronauts on the "moon" in 1969, it was broadcast on live TV. It's all a matter of perspectives....

The sequence of Communism, Terrorism, Rogue nations, Asteroids and finally E.T. has a ring of truth to it.

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

Why won't you name the unnamed astronaut?

Why won't you explain why it is relevant?

Which one of the Apollo 12 crew snapped AS12-50-7362?

What difference does it make?

And which 1 of the 5 windows in the Apollo 12 command module was "clean" enough to snap the "super clean" 7362 image that OBMonkey has been talking about?

Why do you keep demanding information that is not relevant, and refusing to answer direct and relevant questions?

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

Carol Rosin has said in front of the whole wide world (on youtube) that she would testify under oath before Congress.

Not even Congressmen are stupid and credulous enough to ask her to speak.

Oswald said he was a patsy in front of the whole wide world, broadcast on TV.

Do you believe that just because it was on TV?

Oswald was then murdered on live TV.

Was he? Or was it staged?

Richard Nixon talked to astronauts on the "moon" in 1969, it was broadcast on live TV. It's all a matter of perspectives.

I fail to see your point.

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter


And that proves nothing. Unless you can show that he said it to more than her, or that it's written down somewhere, you can't even prove that he said it. She may honestly believe he said it, or she may have twisted something that was said.

reply to post by DJW001

Why do you keep demanding information that is not relevant, and refusing to answer direct and relevant questions?

These are the direct and relevant questions you have avoided answering:
What astronaut snapped image AS12-50-7362?
What window in the command module was the image AS12-50-7362 taken from?

Do you want to gamble away the whole thread by not answering these two very simple questions?

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

These are the direct and relevant questions you have avoided answering:
What astronaut snapped image AS12-50-7362?

Why is that relevant?

What window in the command module was the image AS12-50-7362 taken from?

Why is that relevant?

Do you want to gamble away the whole thread by not answering these two very simple questions?

You're the one who looks like a deceitful idiot. That's not name calling, that is a simple obdervation.

reply to post by ppk55


The fact is the Apollo 11 landing was filmed in the U.K. at Kuback's Studios sound stage and was what you actually saw on TV around the world since it was played exactly timed with the ACTUAL ARMSTRONG STEPPING OUT ON THE MOON.
Pres. Nixon was so fearful of a possible accidence or failure of the mission He had Rumsfelt contact the movie director and persuade him to direct the simulated Apollo 11 landing just in case, so the U.S. could at least say We had landed and then the accidence would come later.

Called International Politics

SayonaraJupiter
What astronaut snapped image AS12-50-7362?

this seems like so important....

apparently NASA had the robotics and engineering tech/skills to send robots to the moon and set up the entire apollo lunar sites and prepare advance video techniques and extremely advance weather prediction methods..

yet they cant get man to the moon.. now why is that?

what was physically holding man back from landing on the moon?

you are making NASA/nixon so astronomically advanced yet they cant land man on the moon for some reason?

so far from what i can gather from your arguments is that the reason why the super advanced organisation known as NASA could not land man on the moon was because Nixon watched alot of movies.

F4Driver
reply to post by ppk55

 

The fact is the Apollo 11 landing was filmed in the U.K. at Kuback's Studios sound stage and was what you actually saw on TV around the world since it was played exactly timed with the ACTUAL ARMSTRONG STEPPING OUT ON THE MOON.
Pres. Nixon was so fearful of a possible accidence or failure of the mission He had Rumsfelt contact the movie director and persuade him to direct the simulated Apollo 11 landing just in case, so the U.S. could at least say We had landed and then the accidence would come later.

Called International Politics

You do realize this was started a joke making fun of apollo deniers. This was thought up by one man his name William Karel and the funniest part is he was making fun of people like you. He created a movie showing how information can be manipulated by conspiracy theorists.And hes the one that invented the idea of Stanley Kubrick making apollo footage.The reason being because anyone with half a brain could tell this was fake he gives you all kinds of clues in his movie. Think of it this way Do you really think NASA would have t)he power to get Stanley Kubrick to stop working and drop off the face of the earth?

here

SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by DJW001

 

Why won't you name the unnamed astronaut? Which one of the Apollo 12 crew snapped AS12-50-7362? And which 1 of the 5 windows in the Apollo 12 command module was "clean" enough to snap the "super clean" 7362 image that OBMonkey has been talking about?

Pointless diversionary tactic - where does this come on your list of propaganda techniques?

2 out of the 5 windows had streaks on them, and they were photographed on day 2 of the mission. At just over 33 hours they ask capcom what camera settings they should use and describe them and suggest a source. I'd guess that as 3 windows were not covered in streaks that they took the photos out of one of those. I'd also wager that there is a one in three chance that the photographer was either Dick Gordon, Pete Conrad or Alan Bean.

You might also want to look at AS12-50-7396, which was clearly taken through one of those streaky windows, but still shows enough detail to prove that the weather patterns on it match what should be showing when you look at the weather satellite data. It's followed a few photographs later by AS12-50-7399, which shows an image of the moon not possible from Earth.

e2a: Wasn't going to, but might as well, AS12-50-7399 compared with 3 different satellite views at the time it was taken (shortly before LOI).

reply to post by ppk55


Why the moon landings were no hoax.

www.evawaseerst.be...

onebigmonkey

SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by DJW001

 

Why won't you name the unnamed astronaut? Which one of the Apollo 12 crew snapped AS12-50-7362? And which 1 of the 5 windows in the Apollo 12 command module was "clean" enough to snap the "super clean" 7362 image that OBMonkey has been talking about?

Pointless diversionary tactic - where does this come on your list of propaganda techniques?

It's hardly a 'pointless diversionary tactic' when it stops your argument dead in the tracks.

What you have with AS12-50-7362 is a "space photo" allegedly taken by an "unknown astronaut".

I'd also wager that there is a one in three chance that the photographer was either Dick Gordon, Pete Conrad or Alan Bean.

There is no pay out for a bet like that, it's 1-1, it's a wash. If you tried to make a bet like that in Las Vegas the casino manager might have you thrown out for making a 'pointless diversionary bet'.

Who was the photographer who snapped AS12-50-7362? It remains a mystery in this thread. This 7362 photo (the entire Magazine Q) could have been taken with a robotic arm, with a camera attachment, mounted inside an unmanned command module.

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter


The photo was taken by Allen Bean he was the unofficial camera man for the misson being a photographer.He even tried to sneak a camera on board but inadvertently left it behind. Now what your doing is called a red herring it isnt relevant because in know way does it effect any information presented. Your just using it to cloud the issue as if something is being hidden.

SayonaraJupiter

Zaphod58
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

 

And you've proven that he actually did say that right? Because he said it to more than one person right?

Carol Rosin has said in front of the whole wide world (on youtube) that she would testify under oath before Congress. Oswald said he was a patsy in front of the whole wide world, broadcast on TV. Oswald was then murdered on live TV. Richard Nixon talked to astronauts on the "moon" in 1969, it was broadcast on live TV. It's all a matter of perspectives....

The sequence of Communism, Terrorism, Rogue nations, Asteroids and finally E.T. has a ring of truth to it.

As you know she agreed to testify being part of her job working with a non profit organization. She made the claim of the death bed confession of his supposed words. However since she was trying to establish herself this quote is ify at best. No one can prove she lied but cant prove shes telling the truth. This is called third party information and isnt even admissible in court. And as such is no proof it actually occurred but she had every reason to lie her job depended on it.

SayonaraJupiter

onebigmonkey

SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by DJW001

 

Why won't you name the unnamed astronaut? Which one of the Apollo 12 crew snapped AS12-50-7362? And which 1 of the 5 windows in the Apollo 12 command module was "clean" enough to snap the "super clean" 7362 image that OBMonkey has been talking about?

Pointless diversionary tactic - where does this come on your list of propaganda techniques?

It's hardly a 'pointless diversionary tactic' when it stops your argument dead in the tracks.

What you have with AS12-50-7362 is a "space photo" allegedly taken by an "unknown astronaut".

I'd also wager that there is a one in three chance that the photographer was either Dick Gordon, Pete Conrad or Alan Bean.

There is no pay out for a bet like that, it's 1-1, it's a wash. If you tried to make a bet like that in Las Vegas the casino manager might have you thrown out for making a 'pointless diversionary bet'.

Who was the photographer who snapped AS12-50-7362? It remains a mystery in this thread. This 7362 photo (the entire Magazine Q) could have been taken with a robotic arm, with a camera attachment, mounted inside an unmanned command module.

Well it could have been if they dropped off the astronauts somewhere but it wasnt.Unless you have proof the command module went to the moon empty if so tell us if not your just clouding the issue.

reply to post by dragonridr

The photo was taken by Allen Bean he was the unofficial camera man for the misson being a photographer.

Source please. This is a disclosure thread so kindly I ask that you disclose your source.

reply to post by dragonridr

This is called third party information and isnt even admissible in court. And as such is no proof it actually occurred but she had every reason to lie her job depended on it.

You say she had every reason to lie but what if she's just a patsy? If you look back at what she is saying, it's 1974, Werner von Braun has abandoned NASA because they won't continue his extended lunar and Mars programs. By 1973 von Braun is out. And by 1974, he's got cancer.

This is the timeframe that Carol Rosin says she was told by von Braun about the existential series of threats, which may indeed be part of a disclosure program, but Carol Rosin testimony, gives us an indication that there is some truth to the threat sequence of Communism, Terrorism, Rogue Nations, Asteroids, and E.T..

Asteroids are increasing... if you have been sticking your head in the sand recently... since Chelyabinsk last February, NASA has introduced the Asteroid Initiative and the United Nations has taken a serious moment to consider the Asteroid Threat, at the same time, commercial interests (B612 group) and the Japanese have even launched an asteroid 'cannon'.


Come on. "SOMETHING" is up there in space, it has been hidden from the general population, it could be my college money... but I think it's Aliens and it's time for disclosure.

SayonaraJupiter

It's hardly a 'pointless diversionary tactic' when it stops your argument dead in the tracks.

What you have with AS12-50-7362 is a "space photo" allegedly taken by an "unknown astronaut".

ah the double standards is strong in this young padawan..

and carol rosin's "list of threats" youtube video was filmed by who?? how do you know it is genuinely carol rosin? what if it was an actor and everything was staged?

who filmed it?? i guess it stops your entire argument dead in its tracks also?

One thing is for certain: the central premise of this thread looks unlikely. Sure, lots may have been revealed in its billion or so pages, but the notion that some sort of disclosure was imminent was clearly false!