It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am one of the few people lucky enough to have viewed the best clip…
Much more detailed than the Patterson/Gimlin Film
Here is just some of what you are going to see:
edit on 28-11-2012 by RUFFREADY because: spelin of cores
Originally posted by Druscilla
Originally posted by RUFFREADY
reply to post by Druscilla
Well Les Stroud will be searching for bigfoot in the not to distant future. He's had two encounters www.abovetopsecret.com... he said in this interview a few days ago (follow link) and really wants to go "alone" to find it once and for all he said.
I think going it alone is the best bet. Going alone presents low impact threat, and higher opportunity for close encounter if these things do indeed exist. It's almost like presenting oneself as bait.
reply to post by Lonewulph
I've been doing solo adventure/survival wilderness trips as far away from civilization as I can get for many sundry years. I'm typically 50-100 miles or more from the nearest sign of any human habitation or structure on any map when I go on a trek.
I'm not hunting Bigfoot. I'm simply getting away from people and exercising some excellent hind brain activity in survival as well as doing some wonderfully strenuous physical exercise.
I'm gone anywhere from a week to a month.
I keep MREs as a fallback, but, part of planning any trip is familiarizing with edible/medicinal wild plants, as well as what local fauna, including edible bugs to expect.
I've never once encountered or experienced anything that would indicate Sasquatch was real and I've sometimes been in areas supposedly saturated with Sasquatch sightings.
I take a sat phone and GPS for emergencies. I ensure I've numbers to local emergency, as well as direct helicopter rental.
If I ever were to sight a bigfoot, I'd like to think that I would indeed do anything I could to kill it. For one, being alone in the wilderness, it'd be an unknown animal and thus a very high potential as a threat.
I know bears, cougars, wolves, and other animals such that they're not really a threat except for certain times of year and situations which you can avoid or manage with experience.
Sasquatch, however, would be an unknown and unknown equals threat.
If I were successful in killing one, they're reported to weigh in at 600lbs or some such. Who's going to drag that kind of weight anywhere for any length of time, even with an ATV?
GPS. Sat Phone. Helicopter. Go.
While waiting, take lots and lots of high quality pictures and video if possible of every inch of the animal.
Ensure to set up a 360 clear view defensible position, especially convenient for helicopter landing.
Damn the cost of the helicopter ride. You'll be able to buy your own private helicopter with the $10million you get for the body plus book/movie rights/sales, etc.
Originally posted by CIAGypsy
Originally posted by Druscilla
Thanks for that.
Those pesky Scooby Doo government Agents are always showing up to ever so conveniently ruin things aren't they?
I know you meant this as a joke ( ) but someone early mentioned how the government knows all about sasquatches but is taking the attitude of "if they don't cause any trouble, just leave them be." Inferring it is the cryptological version of the "Don't ask, don't tell" scenario....
Just wanted to point out that opinion is highly flawed for anyone who knows how the government works, especially in these days and times. Our government is headed for a serious financial crisis. Think how much money it could capture on a worldwide level for "physically finding, scientific discovery of, and potential product revenue" relating to something like Sasquatch??? If they knew it was there and could verify it's existence to the world, they'd do it in a heartbeat just for the revenue. No way they'd allow that little meal ticket to go unused in this political and financial climate.
Originally posted by Druscilla
We'd then thereby have the opportunity to raise our own little baby Sasquatches without the furor of controversy forced captivity from the wild might bring about.
Of course you would....you'd have PETA all over you. Good one, though...
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Originally posted by Druscilla
Originally posted by RUFFREADY
reply to post by Druscilla
Well Les Stroud will be searching for bigfoot in the not to distant future. He's had two encounters www.abovetopsecret.com... he said in this interview a few days ago (follow link) and really wants to go "alone" to find it once and for all he said.
I think going it alone is the best bet. Going alone presents low impact threat, and higher opportunity for close encounter if these things do indeed exist. It's almost like presenting oneself as bait.
reply to post by Lonewulph
I've been doing solo adventure/survival wilderness trips as far away from civilization as I can get for many sundry years. I'm typically 50-100 miles or more from the nearest sign of any human habitation or structure on any map when I go on a trek.
I'm not hunting Bigfoot. I'm simply getting away from people and exercising some excellent hind brain activity in survival as well as doing some wonderfully strenuous physical exercise.
I'm gone anywhere from a week to a month.
I keep MREs as a fallback, but, part of planning any trip is familiarizing with edible/medicinal wild plants, as well as what local fauna, including edible bugs to expect.
I've never once encountered or experienced anything that would indicate Sasquatch was real and I've sometimes been in areas supposedly saturated with Sasquatch sightings.
I take a sat phone and GPS for emergencies. I ensure I've numbers to local emergency, as well as direct helicopter rental.
If I ever were to sight a bigfoot, I'd like to think that I would indeed do anything I could to kill it. For one, being alone in the wilderness, it'd be an unknown animal and thus a very high potential as a threat.
I know bears, cougars, wolves, and other animals such that they're not really a threat except for certain times of year and situations which you can avoid or manage with experience.
Sasquatch, however, would be an unknown and unknown equals threat.
If I were successful in killing one, they're reported to weigh in at 600lbs or some such. Who's going to drag that kind of weight anywhere for any length of time, even with an ATV?
GPS. Sat Phone. Helicopter. Go.
While waiting, take lots and lots of high quality pictures and video if possible of every inch of the animal.
Ensure to set up a 360 clear view defensible position, especially convenient for helicopter landing.
Damn the cost of the helicopter ride. You'll be able to buy your own private helicopter with the $10million you get for the body plus book/movie rights/sales, etc.
Well from what I hear...IF you succeeded in killing one, it would be the last thing you ever kill!
I hear they either rip a person limb from limb or simply pop the head off as if we're a doll.
Do some research and hear what some other hunters have said. One comes to mind where the hunter says he and his friend spotted one and his friend shot it. Almost immediately one charged from their flank and grabbed his friend. Twisted his head off, grabbed his rifle and then walked back into the woods.
Another report is of a guide leading some tourists out and encountering one. He foolishly shot the bf which didn't drop it or even seem to hurt it. According to the tourists the bf proceeded to rip the guide apart and then walk off.
There are multiple reports of people shooting them and it not even seeming to phase them. I wouldn't risk it.
The other problem is it seems they are never alone. So if you do shoot one you are immediately attacked. Thus you wouldn't have a chance to collect any body or money.
Originally posted by Caver78
CNN and Time have picked it up as well as an abbreviated interview on GMA.
www.youtube.com...
Human Rights lawyers will, I assume, have to wrangle over the BF issue. I also imagine where they fall in the evolutionary tree is going to be looked at. It's a legal can of worms regardless.
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
reply to post by Druscilla
How genetically similar to us would a Bigfoot have to be before killing one could be considered murder?
Personally I would consider the deliberate killing of a chimp or gorilla to be a morally reprehensible act. The idea that someone would deliberately kill a member of a species that was even closer to us, perhaps even a hybrid homo sapiens, is even worse.
They seem to be doing fine as long we leave them alone. We shouldn't be killing them just to satisfy our curiosity. There must be other ways of confirming their existence (dna evidence a case in point) other than just shooting one.
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by DZAG Wright
Yes, we'd like to see some sources for your, erm, stories.
Hunters have guns. If I were a hunter watching a friend getting ripped to pieces by an animal, I would would be firing at it non-stop until it dropped, or I ran out of ammunition.
Whatever the case, we would indeed like to see your sources. Simply saying "do your research; it's somewhere online" is antithesis to any kind of informed and educated conversation on the topic.
There are three types of Bigfoot, if you will accept that vibratory sound complex used for three such different races of mind/body/spirit complexes. The first two we have described.
The third is a thought-form.
9.20 Questioner: Are they Bigfoot-type creatures?
Ra: This is correct although we would not call these Bigfoot, as they are scarce and are very able to escape detection. The first race is less able to be aware of proximity of other mind/body/spirit complexes, but these beings are very able to escape due to their technological understandings before their incarnations here.
9.17 Questioner: Is there any particular race of people on our planet now who were incarnated here from second density?
Ra: I am Ra. There are no second-density consciousness complexes here on your sphere at this time. However, there are two races which use the second-density form. One is the entities of the planetary sphere you call Maldek. These entities are working their understanding complexes through a series of what you would call karmic restitutions. They dwell within your deeper underground passageways and are known to you as “Bigfoot.”
The other race is that being offered a dwelling in this density by guardians who wish to give the mind/body/spirit complexes of those who are of this density at this time appropriately engineered physical vehicles, as you would call these chemical complexes, in the event that there is what you call nuclear war.
64.19 Questioner: He also asked—I know this is also unimportant—why there were no Bigfoot remains found after the entities have died on our surface. Could you also answer this? I know this is of no importance but as a service to him I ask it.
Ra: I am Ra. You may suggest that exploration of the caves which underlie some of the western coastal mountain regions of your continent will one day offer such remains. They will not be generally understood if this culture survives in its present form long enough in your time measurement for this probability/possibility vortex to occur.