posted on Nov, 17 2012 @ 07:50 AM
reply to post by mc_squared
Look who is talking... Now you are tryng to twist the meaning of the word "pollution"...
And like always, since you have no real counter-argument to offer, instead you throw personal insults, which to you mean "evidence" apparently...
Shall we look at what the AGW camp, lunatics all, call pollution?...
E.P.A. Clears Way for Greenhouse Gas Rules
By JOHN M. BRODER
Published: April 17, 2009
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Friday formally declared carbon dioxide and five other heat-trapping gases to be
pollutants that endanger public health and welfare, setting in motion a process that will lead to the regulation of the gases for the first
time in the United States.
...
www.nytimes.com...
But maybe we will have to use some comic strips because that seems to be the only thing "squared" seems to comprehend...
Hey, at least you can try your luck as a comedian, people will laugh at your attempt at humor...
Oh, and watch, next he is going to try to claim that the EPA made that ruling in 2009, and the NASA article is from 2005, but he won't even mention
the fact that his idols, and the AGW camp in general have been calling CO2 a pollutant for more than 10 years at least...
edit on 17-11-2012 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)