Quentron Energy Convertor

Quenco (Quantum Energy Converter)

This tech is planned for release by the end of the month.

Quenco is an ultra thin film that will make oil, coal, gas and nuclear obsolete
All the energy mankind will ever need is in the air and water that surrounds us
Quenco extracts heat from air to make electricity, even if the air is sub zero
It is solid state, safe, pollution free and will be made available for everyone
Quenco uses energy filtered electron tunnelling and so it is just 3nm's thick.

The energy it converts is the heat it is supplied and more specifically it extracts kinetic energy from hot tail energy electrons converting that energy into an electrical potential. IE If you only supply a Joule of heat you can only extract a Watt, at least at a point of equilibrium.

OFFICIAL LAUNCH USA & EUROPE
30th November 2012

25-page Thread

Originally posted by Raelsatu
Quenco (Quantum Energy Converter)

This tech is planned for release by the end of the month.

We have heard silly claims like this many times before - remember the Orbo, or the e-cat?

They have all turned out to be frauds, just like this one will.

Ha ha ha.

Anyone with an ounce of brains would know the pattern here, especially his website and investment process....let alone his defense of his product on a forum. For Pete's sake people. use your brain on this one. It's a fraud.

(I'm also working on something for the last 15 years, but if it ever works, it will be released through a major corporation not on the internet via a website with a blog in support of it.

After January next year, people will realize their money is gone and eventually he'll be found (obviously Philip Hardcastle is not his real name) and he will eventually be prosecuted for fraud.

I would dearly love to be wrong but I'd bet $1,000,000 I'm not. And for me that's a better investment than 'quentron'

reply to post by Raelsatu


I am open minded about such topics OP, but I didnt see any "proof" in the thread anywhere, just them making claims.

I guess we will find out in about 3 weeks eh?

star and flag OP, I hope this is true, but I wont hold my breath.

Yes I understand the skepticism when it comes to anything free-energy related. It's possible/probable this is a fraud.

He states

I hope to be able to get Eric Wesoff to test the QiPad
Eric seems to me to be 100% sceptical about Quenco
There can be no better report than one from a sceptic
(Eric Wesoff is the Editor in Chief at Greentech Media)
www.cleantechlawpartners.com/CLP/Eric_Wesoff.html

So we'll see if this tech really means anything very soon. One of the reasons I posted is because the release date is so close... I'm trying to be optimistic though. =]

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by Raelsatu
Quenco (Quantum Energy Converter)

This tech is planned for release by the end of the month.

We have heard silly claims like this many times before - remember the Orbo, or the e-cat?

They have all turned out to be frauds, just like this one will.

When did the ECat turn out to be a fraud?

Hi! I've got a device that defies the laws of thermodynamics! Please invest in my company! Thanks!

reply to post by pteridine


It didn't. Rossi is still going strong, setting up his distribution network, and has made some sales already. Gearing up for the next year or two for them to hit big. He's really not looking fraudy at this point. Granted, I won't 'believe' in him until I have an ecat running my house, but at this point I'm willing to at least grant that HE thinks it works.

Originally posted by pteridine

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by Raelsatu
Quenco (Quantum Energy Converter)

This tech is planned for release by the end of the month.

We have heard silly claims like this many times before - remember the Orbo, or the e-cat?

They have all turned out to be frauds, just like this one will.

When did the ECat turn out to be a fraud?

The first time it was mentioned. It was confirmed to be a fraud with each subsequent "test",

Originally posted by Stunspot
reply to post by pteridine

 

It didn't. Rossi is still going strong, setting up his distribution network, and has made some sales already. Gearing up for the next year or two for them to hit big. He's really not looking fraudy at this point. Granted, I won't 'believe' in him until I have an ecat running my house, but at this point I'm willing to at least grant that HE thinks it works.

He promised he would not take early sales, then did. That is his angle right there. He has nothing and is making money off it. Fraud. How you think he is looking legit is beyond me, he has used every single shady play in the fraud book, and then invented a few more.

reply to post by OccamsRazor04


Except for the fact that _he's still there_. He hasn't cut and run, he's very publicly attached his name to the project, and delivered tangible goods to customers. And for the love of god, don't mistake "refusal to condemn" for "unequivocal support". I maintain that the jury is still out with a likelihood of measurable results to come that will either confirm or devastate his claims.

Originally posted by Stunspot
reply to post by OccamsRazor04

 

Except for the fact that _he's still there_. He hasn't cut and run, he's very publicly attached his name to the project, and delivered tangible goods to customers. And for the love of god, don't mistake "refusal to condemn" for "unequivocal support". I maintain that the jury is still out with a likelihood of measurable results to come that will either confirm or devastate his claims.

edit on 11-11-2012 by Stunspot because: (no reason given)

Why would he cut and run when he is finally making money? When the money well runs dry, he will. He has been promising results and 3rd party verification for years. He refuses to allow it. If it walks like a duck and quacks ...

reply to post by OccamsRazor04

This is because it does not work. Even if it did work...this would NEVER be talked about on this Board. I find it amusing that all these people post about how they have discovered some World Changing Tech. on this board as if it the FIRST THING they would do after achieving success! LOL!

It's like...HEY! I have discovered how to make Perpetual Motion as well as I have developed commercial apps for it...so I am going to tell everyone on ATS! LOL!

Split Infinity

There is a half a dozen threads here showing the evidence that Rossi has allowed tests and all turned out favorable. The only thing Rossi will not allow is a compete dismantling of the unit so as not to expose his propitiatory catalyst to the nickle hydrogen reactor which is standard business practice for any company developing proprietary products. Several prominent scientist have confirmed there was more output then input and no trickery search the threads here.

There is nothing proving the e-cat is a fraud. The people who bought the e-cat bought the large power plant and were satisfied with the tests and it has been up and running for several months at a time, Although they are making some modifications last I heard. If there was any fraud they would have shouted it from the housetops by now.

Those claiming Rossi's e-cat is a fraud never provide any evidence whatsoever because there isn't any so far. Could it be a fraud? Sure but so far it has been the most promising and open and is looking pretty good so far.

Originally posted by hawkiye
There is a half a dozen threads here showing the evidence that Rossi has allowed tests and all turned out favorable.

They have? care to link us to those favourable tests?

The people who bought the e-cat bought the large power plant and were satisfied with the tests and it has been up and running for several months at a time,

Care to show us some proof of that - and a claim by Rossi is NOT proof....

Those claiming Rossi's e-cat is a fraud never provide any evidence whatsoever because there isn't any so far.

And Rossi still has not allowed independent tests by a competent authority.

reply to post by hawkiye


I think you have the logic confused on this issue. It is not the onus for people to provide proof that there is information that would show that there has never been any reason to not believe this claim.

THE ONUS IS UPON THE PERSON CLAIMING THE DISCOVERY OR TECH TO PROVE THIS DISCOVERY OR TECH WORKS!

If they cannot do that then it is reasonable to assume they are stating Fraudulent Claims.

Split Infinity

Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by hawkiye

 

I think you have the logic confused on this issue. It is not the onus for people to provide proof that there is information that would show that there has never been any reason to not believe this claim.

THE ONUS IS UPON THE PERSON CLAIMING THE DISCOVERY OR TECH TO PROVE THIS DISCOVERY OR TECH WORKS!

If they cannot do that then it is reasonable to assume they are stating Fraudulent Claims.

Split Infinity

I am not confused about anything like I said there are a half a dozen threads where the proof has been posted already but every time the e-cat comes up someone comes on a says it is a fraud with no evidence to back their claim or counter the large amount of evidence that has already been posted in other threads which does not need to be posted in a dozen more threads just because some fool does a drive by "its a fraud" claim... Prove it is a fraud or put a sock in it...

reply to post by hawkiye


Hawk...it is up to the person who made the claims of success to PROVE they accomplished this feat. It isn't the responsibility of those who are asking for proof to provide proof that they have proof that it is fake.

WOW! THAT was a tongue twister! LOL!

Split Infinity

Originally posted by hawkiye
There is a half a dozen threads here showing the evidence that Rossi has allowed tests and all turned out favorable. The only thing Rossi will not allow is a compete dismantling of the unit so as not to expose his propitiatory catalyst to the nickle hydrogen reactor which is standard business practice for any company developing proprietary products. Several prominent scientist have confirmed there was more output then input and no trickery search the threads here.

There is nothing proving the e-cat is a fraud. The people who bought the e-cat bought the large power plant and were satisfied with the tests and it has been up and running for several months at a time, Although they are making some modifications last I heard. If there was any fraud they would have shouted it from the housetops by now.

Those claiming Rossi's e-cat is a fraud never provide any evidence whatsoever because there isn't any so far. Could it be a fraud? Sure but so far it has been the most promising and open and is looking pretty good so far.

Wrong, there are no threads showing that. There are threads with someone saying that and quickly evidence piles up proving it never happened. Please tell me of ONE test that allowed for thorough independent testing by neutral scientists.

Originally posted by hawkiye

Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by hawkiye

 

I think you have the logic confused on this issue. It is not the onus for people to provide proof that there is information that would show that there has never been any reason to not believe this claim.

THE ONUS IS UPON THE PERSON CLAIMING THE DISCOVERY OR TECH TO PROVE THIS DISCOVERY OR TECH WORKS!

If they cannot do that then it is reasonable to assume they are stating Fraudulent Claims.

Split Infinity

I am not confused about anything like I said there are a half a dozen threads where the proof has been posted already but every time the e-cat comes up someone comes on a says it is a fraud with no evidence to back their claim or counter the large amount of evidence that has already been posted in other threads which does not need to be posted in a dozen more threads just because some fool does a drive by "its a fraud" claim... Prove it is a fraud or put a sock in it...

edit on 11-11-2012 by hawkiye because: (no reason given)

Lack of evidence is evidence in and of itself. The only information we have is what Rossi allows. We have Rossi making claims which he has never once backed up. I can show you where Rossi says one thing then does another. All of that is evidence of fraud. Just because you want it to be true does not make it so, I would love it if it was true, it sadly is not.

Also your asking for proof is like me teling you to prove you didnt think of the number 5 last night. The proof is on me to prove what you thought, not you to prove the impossible. The proof is on Rossi to prove his invention works, not me to prove it doesn't when Rossi refuses to allow any information to be known.