It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by UltraMarine
reply to post by jjkenobi
The criminals will always have guns because they DON'T OBEY THE LAWS. That's why they are criminals. It just means the rest of us will be defenseless
We Civilians shouldn't possess guns . There are cops to protect us from Criminals . We cannot take law into our own hand .
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by Phoenix
Gun ownership in itself hasn't stopped any tyranny.
If the current administration would try to confiscate weapons then it might.
Meanwhile tyranny exists all dandy and fine armed with million times more firepower than the gun owning citizens.
2nd amendment is not a thread to tyranny unless they try to dismantle it.
Regulating it to fullest and being completely facist at the same time brings no conflict.
Also who I am is irrelevant.
Originally posted by Phoenix
So you claim that gun ownership by my forefathers did not throw off a tyrannical government?
Am I to believe you are saying the average US citizen is tyrannical?
2nd amendment is not a thread to tyranny unless they try to dismantle it.
???????????????
Our Constitution precludes this in its very form. I'm still trying to figure out the facism angle though - maybe you can elaborate.
Also who I am is irrelevant.
Must have hit proverbial nail on head - Russian emigre' ? clue might be the continued reference to facism or am I wrong. Its relevant to place your commentary into context rather than just thin air. Again it is very hard to place your opinion into context of Finlands proud history of self defence and individualism.
Originally posted by Starwise
Originally posted by UltraMarine
reply to post by badgerprints
Isn't global gun ban a good idea ?
No its not. Gun ownership helps prevent governments from transforming into a TYRANNICAL BEAST !!
Not sure if this is true yet.
Originally posted by ConspiracyBuff
According to the Constitution, Militias are provisioned the same weaponry as our standing Army, so technically Militias should have nukes... Any surprise why Militias have been vilified?
Obviously, the Founding Fathers realized if the standing Army were allowed to possess superior fire power the people would not stand a chance against tyranny. Think Muskets vs. Cannons - this is why Militia bunkers were stocked with cannons.
The entire world would have to descend upon the US population to efficiently disarm it, or revolution would ensue over night. Logistically speaking it would be impossible for our Armed Forces to disarm the population by force, as soon as they ran out of fuel and or almost any supply - they would be quickly thwarted by kids with hunting rifles. Honestly, look at the track record since the Korean War. If you think the 'insurgents' gave our military trouble in Afghan and Iraq, just imagine what damage the armed population could do against our military. They would almost have no option but to nuke.
Tangent: I think this is a primary reason why the population has been indoctrinated since kindergarten to view our country as a 'Democracy' and not a 'Republic' because in a Democracy 51% can tell 49% how to live. In a Republic 99% cannot tell 1% how to live.
In 'Murica the mob rules...
Originally posted by texasgirl
Originally posted by UltraMarine
reply to post by jjkenobi
The criminals will always have guns because they DON'T OBEY THE LAWS. That's why they are criminals. It just means the rest of us will be defenseless
We Civilians shouldn't possess guns . There are cops to protect us from Criminals . We cannot take law into our own hand .
The British get shot at by their own police, and criminals, also Australia, do a bit of reading.
Originally posted by Valhall
reply to post by xedocodex
Excuse me, but Reuters reported this. Be part of the solution...not the problem.
www.reuters.com...
Originally posted by rockymcgilicutty
reply to post by khimbar
" Shall not be infringed upon".What don't people understand
Hours after U.S. President Barack Obama was re-elected, the United States backed a U.N. committee's call on Wednesday to renew debate over a draft international treaty to regulate the $70 billion global conventional arms trade.
Originally posted by UltraMarine
reply to post by badgerprints
Isn't global gun ban a good idea ?