Do you think they can really take our guns?

Originally posted by Nite_wing
All that has to happen is:
1. Hillary signs the U.N. Small Arms Treaty.
2. Harry Reid refuses to let the Senate vote on it. Therefore it becomes ratified.
3. National Guard shows up at your door.
NWO wins.

Your ownly looking outside your window,when the word gets out there going door to door what do you thank is going to happen when they go to Chicago,or La....they will just stop makeing the bullet & make it very hard to buy a BB gun I can get a bazooka the shells cost$200.00 they can have my 22 revolver it will just make me madd to give it up,lol

reply to post by wrksstudios


I honestly don't see how that could ever happen. They would need to send troops, police or both to collect them and since the majority of both groups are gun owners themselves it would be impossible.
Also, the Mexicans have plenty of guns and considering their entrepreneurial spirit with illegal drugs it wouldn't take long for that pipeline to open.

The only one telling you they are going to take your guns are GUNS SHOPS! LOL

Shows like Top Gun, American Guns and Sons of Guns pretty much tells you the climate of gun control in the United States of America.

A sweeping gun reform or whole sale collection of weapons and arms would cause rioting and and insurgency.

Taking our guns is the silliest conspiracy right up there with not landing on the moon and seriously the conspiracy is in the gun manufacturers, arms dealers and gun smiths who start these rumors to increase their already bloated incomes...

If you thank outside the bubble there would first have to be a collapse, lets say;

In reality our stock market and monetary systems are fake; meaning that there is nothing holding them in place except the illusion that they have stabilized since the Stock Market Crash nearly 5 years ago.

Hold on to your guns there just not comeing after them yet.

The US government and defense agencies estimate they have a 72 hour window to activate all procedures to ensure continuity of government as well as a lockdown of the general population as civilian unrest, riots and outbreaks of violence are anticipated.

Our great leaders will clean up get rid of
Any American who is deemed a “national security threat”
Hold on to your guns they are just restoreing law & order.
To ensure stabilization of our nation at any cost.
Now there must be full implementation of marital law to control the potential riots and control over citizens that will be desperate to feed their families.
they cannot remove the guns from our hands , they will continue on with the guidelines set out with directives to kill any dissenters that refuse to obey.
You shoot at them they shoot back
There not going to go door to door asking for your Gun.

No.

BUT... they can make it difficult and expensive. My prediction: There will be a question on your income tax form: do you own any firearms? It will snowball from there. Just like it did cigarettes with the very high taxes they have.

But a "gun grab" no way. There's 300 million guns. And a whole subculture that has buried a good number of them in sealed PVC tubes with ammo and dessicants.

Besides that there are lots of jobs associated with them. Think manufacturing and gun ranges. But hey, that never stopped Obama and his unconstitutional late Friday night executive orders...

reply to post by wrksstudios


They'll take mine out of my cold dead hands lol

Originally posted by davjan4
No.

BUT... they can make it difficult and expensive. My prediction: There will be a question on your income tax form: do you own any firearms? It will snowball from there. Just like it did cigarettes with the very high taxes they have.

But a "gun grab" no way. There's 300 million guns. And a whole subculture that has buried a good number of them in sealed PVC tubes with ammo and dessicants.

Besides that there are lots of jobs associated with them. Think manufacturing and gun ranges. But hey, that never stopped Obama and his unconstitutional late Friday night executive orders...

Globalist puppets like Daniel Webster, co-director of the anti-firearm John Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, asserts that “gun ownership—a precursor to gun violence—can spread ‘much like an infectious disease” and wants healthcare professionals to have influence over whether or not American citizens are legally allowed to possess firearms.
Webster would like to see Obamacare have ultimate control of the classification of mental states with regard to purchasing and obtaining FBI clearance for a gun.

De-arming the American public would be much easier by taxing the crap out of ammunition, banning internet sales of ammo, etc, etc. They could make firing our weapons a very expensive luxury that few could afford. They could make the re-loading of ammunition illegal, further limiting our ability to fire our weapons. The funny thing about Democrats or Obama is that everytime either one mentions gun control, ever notice what happens to gun purchases? Yes, they increase, go through the roof. Think about it. It's a game I think. I don't think Obama really wants to de-arm Americans.

They will try at some point but they will not just pass a law and start trying to collect them they know better then that. They have been trying for decades in individual states using incrementalism but they are getting more impatient...

However in order to try it in mass they will need a major crisis to implement marshal law... That's when they will try it. Katrina was their test case and it did not work out well for them. Yeah they showed a few being confiscated but what they didn't show was the vast majority telling them to move on or die trying to take them...

Several states such as mine have passed laws against any such Katrina style confiscation in the event of a crisis including by federal authorities. Their best shot is a battered weakened populace from some attack, disaster, or pandemic where many have lost the will to resist and will give up their guns in exchange for assistance... That may be what they are covertly planning for with all their stock piling of food ammo weapons etc. and their underground hidy-holes

This is why it is important to be prepared so you do not need their assistance and have a plan for if they come to try to confiscate weapons. Never give up your weapons in a crisis situation and leave yourself defenseless.

They could get us with the ammo, prices and such. And I could totally see them trying to make the guns more expensive. But wouldn't the rise in cost because the fed is regulating the gun company's more. We know that the UN and the NWO want the American people disarmed. I just don't think the people will allow it.

lemme guess

a gun dealer told you to buy know before obama takes your guns ?

something like that ?

Let me put this into words "y'all" can understand...

Da gubermint ain't fixin to take yer gunz away. Dontcha y'all fret nun, ol Betsy is safe in your hands and dey won't be a pryin it from yer cold dead fingers.

But quite honestly, a great many of you pro gun people should really seriously consider at least taking a gun safety course, because you are far too immature to even hold a firearm. Let alone have a discussion about gun ownership.

Since the great majority of posters on this site who are pro gun ownership are only really desperately interested in shooting their fellow countrymen the first chance they get. It pains me to think that many clearly devolved and emotionally unstable want firearms just for either the penile extension by proxy, or the fulfillment of the desire to end another human beings life.

The USA would be better without guns, anybody who argues against this is obsessed with the faux-sense of power a gun gives them.

Originally posted by syrinx high priest
lemme guess

a gun dealer told you to buy know before obama takes your guns ?

something like that ?

No, surprisingly everyone I have asked said the opposite. The ones I have talked to said it wouldn't be possible.

Originally posted by wrksstudios

Originally posted by syrinx high priest
lemme guess

a gun dealer told you to buy know before obama takes your guns ?

something like that ?

No, surprisingly everyone I have asked said the opposite. The ones I have talked to said it wouldn't be possible.

so there ya go

now lets solve world hunger

Originally posted by Cynicaleye
The USA would be better without guns, anybody who argues against this is obsessed with the faux-sense of power a gun gives them.

Yet another senseless, mindless, idiotic post.
2nd

Originally posted by HauntWok
Let me put this into words "y'all" can understand...

Da gubermint ain't fixin to take yer gunz away. Dontcha y'all fret nun, ol Betsy is safe in your hands and dey won't be a pryin it from yer cold dead fingers.

But quite honestly, a great many of you pro gun people should really seriously consider at least taking a gun safety course, because you are far too immature to even hold a firearm. Let alone have a discussion about gun ownership.

Since the great majority of posters on this site who are pro gun ownership are only really desperately interested in shooting their fellow countrymen the first chance they get. It pains me to think that many clearly devolved and emotionally unstable want firearms just for either the penile extension by proxy, or the fulfillment of the desire to end another human beings life.

I was military and I've trained my whole life around guns so I wouldn't be so anti gun to people you know nothing about. And really, guns are prob one of the simplest devices on the planet. You have to be pretty dumb to not grasp the safety thing in minutes. There are many untrained people out there and they should def be trained.

reply to post by wrksstudios

I was military and I've trained my whole life around guns so I wouldn't be so anti gun to people you know nothing about. And really, guns are prob one of the simplest devices on the planet. You have to be pretty dumb to not grasp the safety thing in minutes. There are many untrained people out there and they should def be trained.

Yea, that's the problem. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not anti gun, I'm anti moron. There's a difference. And arming morons is something that I am absolutely against. No one should give an idiot a firearm. It's a lot like giving a monkey a gun, it's just not a good idea.

Originally posted by HauntWok
Let me put this into words "y'all" can understand...

Da gubermint ain't fixin to take yer gunz away. Dontcha y'all fret nun, ol Betsy is safe in your hands and dey won't be a pryin it from yer cold dead fingers.

But quite honestly, a great many of you pro gun people should really seriously consider at least taking a gun safety course, because you are far too immature to even hold a firearm. Let alone have a discussion about gun ownership.

Since the great majority of posters on this site who are pro gun ownership are only really desperately interested in shooting their fellow countrymen the first chance they get. It pains me to think that many clearly devolved and emotionally unstable want firearms just for either the penile extension by proxy, or the fulfillment of the desire to end another human beings life.

Spot on, most of the people in this thread are red-necks.FACT.

reply to post by Cynicaleye


The problem with many of these pro gun people is that they think that Red Dawn is a documentary and Call of Duty equates to military service.

You can't actually have a real discussion about guns in this country, because in doing so, you just unleash their 2nd Amendment tourettes syndrome where they scream the second part of the 2nd Amendment to infinity and think that's a real argument.