posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 04:43 AM
Wow, what a thread, thanks to the OP and all the other contributors, my mind is blown.
Saville seemed to have been hidden in plain site, I can understand people not believing his victims, it's too outrageous to have been true. That
said, the BBC knew enough to have realised these victims were genuine, and they swept it under the carpet. in fact, they did worse than that, they
aired a programme about how great Saville was when they KNEW their own investigators were about to run a programme telling the truth about him. This
condoned his behavior. I have been wondering why such a high profile organisation would do this and concluded that it can only be because it goes way
up to the top of the chain and that's why the Beeb had to run the tribute programme . I think any other type of criminality would be hushed up, but
Child abuse will not, it is a crime that is abhorred by too many people. The Childrens homes that benefitted from his 'largesse' are also guilty of
pimping, they also knew what was going on. It's absolutely staggering, I thought that I was beyond being this shocked by anything, it has taken away
another bit of me that was trusting. The poor victims of these crimes are scarred for life for something they didn't do and had no control over, they
couldn't leave their situation, they were powerless and trapped, or conned by manipulative, sinister scum. I also feel sorry for the relatives of
Saville, he abused some of them, and have also left them with the guilt and shame of what he did. There is a call for Savilles' body to be dug up and
cremated which indicates how much loathing there is for him and how illogical the masses can be when their dander is up. I think stripping him of his
knighthood is enough for the time being - blooming hell, I just realised, a knighthood! When it was known what he was doing! Who on earth gave him
that? And why? Why were the masses told Ted Heath was gay? If the media knew so much about him, they must have known that he was really a paedophile,
telling us he was gay gave us enough information to stop any further questions being asked about him, and possibly feeling a bit sorry for him, given
the climate at the time - but he was a paedo hiding behind homosexuality. I can no longer think straight.