It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Internal campaign polling completed last night by campaign pollster Neil Newhouse has Romney three points up in New Hampshire [4 EVs], two points up in Iowa and dead level in Wisconsin and – most startlingly – Pennsylvania,” Harden reports.
“If the Romney campaign’s internal numbers are correct — and nearly all independent pollsters have come up with a picture much more favourable for Obama — then the former Massachusetts governor will almost certainly be elected 45th U.S. President,” he adds.
As of this writing, most polls show President Obama with an edge in Nevada (6 EVs) and early voting data shows he will most like carry the state.
Here’s what the election will look like is the new internal polling data is accurate [courtesy Real Clear Politics]:
But the Romney adviser said that this has been turned around. 'Sandy didn't flip us with independents but it narrowed. Then on Friday we got back in business with the "revenge" ad. Finally, we got back into business.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by solidguy
Judging by the posts that you did, it seems your one of those Romney supporters not surprising. Has what Taiyed stated above, if Romney was winning and had it in the bag why would at least his Campaign release there own Campaign Internal Poll?
You dont see Obama doing that. That sounds pretty much desperately.edit on 5-11-2012 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by solidguy
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by solidguy
Judging by the posts that you did, it seems your one of those Romney supporters not surprising. Has what Taiyed stated above, if Romney was winning and had it in the bag why would at least his Campaign release there own Campaign Internal Poll?
You dont see Obama doing that. That sounds pretty much desperately.edit on 5-11-2012 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)
Why would Obama have to to that when he has the government controlled media on his side?
Why would Obama have to to that when he has the government controlled media on his side?