Hello my question is since Adolf Hitler was a Puppet of the New World Order Elites and was taking Or

Hello my question is since Adolf Hitler was a Puppet of the New World Order Elites and was taking Orders from the Elites does this mean Hitler was not responsibe for the Holocaust the War Crimes and for World War 2 since he was only following orders and he was a Puppet and or a Figurehead ?

Was Hitler Just A Pawn?
By Henry Makow PhD
Updated From August, 2008
6-2-8

rense.com...

reply to post by mikejohnson2006


If true, he still did their bidding, which makes him just as responsible as the elite above him.

Though I did not read your linked article before I answered, so no idea if it contains some strange new facts...

reply to post by mikejohnson2006

just a thought to consider, it is not the elites or evil humans, it is something in spirit, what causes crimes like the holocaust.

It is highly speculative that Hitler was the pawn of anyone. That is a conspiracy theory that will likely never be proven either way. Personally, I find it doubtful. As far I know there is no credible evidence that Hitler answered to someone higher than himself, from the time he became leader of Germany until the time of his death.

As for the Holocaust, Hitler and other high-ranking Nazis were directly responsible for the Final Solution, Heinrich Himmler being the chief architect of the plan.

Originally posted by mikejohnson2006
Hello my question is since Adolf Hitler was a Puppet of the New World Order Elites

What makes you think Hitler was a puppet?

Care to show the NWO even exists?

reply to post by mikejohnson2006


Just obeying orders is not considered a defence in any court.

You might like to do some research on the Nuremberg Trials.

If it is true that the bodies they found outside the bunker were not hitler and eva, then, that shows there was a bigger plan involving greater powers than what we are led to believe.
The pictures that allegedly show Hitler in south america are very convincing.

I read an article a few years back about Hitler that shed a different light on his reign of power. It proposed that Hitler was just a figurehead for the Nazi Party and it was, in fact, the people who surrounded him (Goebbels, Göring, Himmler, Bormann, Heydrich et al) who really pulled the strings.

And even they answered to someone...

just research what banks support Hitler to achieve what he did and U will find the answer for Your question...

reply to post by LiveForever8


really?..you'll be telling me next that Hitler was a good man and done a lot of charity work in Africa ..

come on guys read Mein Kampf for a true insight of this completely insane human being

his words ...not mine

Creating hatred toward your own party or religion or nation as a means of control seems to be a strategy behind Hitlers rise.
Now consider our candidates Obama and Romney. both are pushing wars against muslims, Romney kissed Bibis ring and promised to attack Iran; Obama allowed the attack on Bengazi to kill the ambassador.
BOth candidates have deep bankster connections, Soros, an actual German agent at one time, and Romney, with Goldman Sachs JP Morgan et al.... whose roots are in the Rothschilds and Rockefellars.
Now consider the liklihood the Hitler himself is the illegitimate offspring of a German Rothschild and the family maid (Schickelgruber.)

Attack by way of deception. the Israeli battle cry.
never forget 911

reply to post by sitchin

Originally posted by sitchin
really?..you'll be telling me next that Hitler was a good man and done a lot of charity work in Africa ..

Really? Why would I be doing that?

Originally posted by sitchin
come on guys read Mein Kampf for a true insight of this completely insane human being

his words ...not mine

He was most definitely a psychopath, but nowhere near being insane.

And yes, to keep you happy...Hitler was a very bad man

reply to post by mikejohnson2006


I've heard all kinds of crazy stuff about Hitler.. From being trained in the UK to being a very good friend of the Zionists of the day, a homosexual, the aurora which made him decide to start WW2, the list goes on. Was he responsible for the Holocaust? Yes...

It doesn't matter whether he was an elite puppet or not. He ordered the massacre of millions of people ans he will be the big bad boogeyman until someone exposes the elite.

Originally posted by darkstar57
Now consider the liklihood the Hitler himself is the illegitimate offspring of a German Rothschild and the family maid (Schickelgruber.)

In an attempt to prove Hitler was a tool of others you are grasping at straws in speculating his parentage!

Hitler was controlled by no one apart from himself. In the same way that Stalin and Mao were on their own payroll. Even speculating that the bankers controlled Hitler is siding with silliness. Banks were involved in the creation of the Third Reich, but that’s because there was a money to be made in the resurrection of an industrial Germany.

If anyone has any concrete proof that there is a shady NWO that has been able to manipulate all world leaders, then please present. Otherwise, it’s all tosh.

Regards

reply to post by TheComte


I disagree. I think the Zionists played a very big role in what happened over there. They were very close with the NAZIs and also took them through Palestine. The thing that gets me is that the Jews in the holocaust were just ordinary citizens. the Zionists are not and could of planned with the NAZIs which would enable them to secure Palestine. But that is another story in itself.

reply to post by paraphi

In an attempt to prove Hitler was a tool....................

I'll just stop you right there mate.

You only have to look at the blokes haircut and mo to realise he was a tool!

Prolly had a small "membership" too.

reply to post by paraphi


www.reformation.org...

I don't know how credible the information actually is but it is interesting.

Alois Schicklgruber—father of Adolf Hitler—was the illegitimate son of Maria Anna Schicklgruber and Baron Rothschild. The Schicklgruber name was changed to Hitler in 1876. Klara was the third wife of Alois and the mother of Adolf.

By November 1913, Adolf had completed his mind control brainwashing at the Tavistock Institute. By that time he was also fluent in English:

And a bit more from the same source.

My brother-in-law Adolf remained with us from November 1912 until April 1913, and a less interesting or prepossessing house guest I cannot imagine. At first he remained in his room, sleeping or lying on the sofa he used as a bed most of the time. I had an idea that he was ill, his colour was so bad and his eyes looked so peculiar. I felt rather sorry for him in spite of what Alois had told me. When I washed his shirt—he had no luggage with him—the collar was so frayed and worn that it wasn't even worth turning.

I persuaded Alois to give him a few things, and as a matter of fact he wasn't at all reluctant to do so. Indeed I think he would have been more than willing to help Adolf if the latter hadn't been so unappreciative and difficult. Adolf took everything we did for granted and I'm sure would have remained indefinitely if he had had the slightest encouragement. (Bridget Hitler, Memoirs, p. 28).

All the information from the source is also cited by the looks of it.

reply to post by mikejohnson2006


Whether you believe he was a puppet or not he still went through with the heinous crime of killing millions upon millions of people. He personally takes responsibility for this so yes he is a bad man. You can say he got his just deserts but the NWO folks are still at large and free as birds and that's why this world is in the dumpster.

reply to post by DarknStormy


It is not credible.

reply to post by TheComte


Why not?

You must know something that I missed.