It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by Trexter Ziam
Dear Trexter Ziam,
Maybe; but, that the doctors said he shouldn't have lived beyond a day. Why would they say that if it is nothing special?
Bodies do not grow souls! Theyre just temporary suits we use to lean, soul is infinite part of infinity
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
I think this condition may shed some light on the soul, as others have pointed out. If these kids were able to do what is claimed, and interact, among other things, without a brain, then the brain is not the intermediary between the body and soul. This is important because it implies, possibly at least, that the soul is not product of having a brain, but rather exists for every living person. This would seem important from a religious point of view, and important for anyone interested in what happens after death. I personally believe in the idea that the body is but a suit for the soul.
Originally posted by Hr2burn
This does an interesting thought. If the brain holds conscientious, is this where the "soul" resides? Having no brain would you then also have no soul? (for those of us that believe in theses things) it says he was playing with pumpkins before he died. With nothing more than a brain stem it seems to me you would have no need, desire or ability to interact with anything.
Originally posted by Bluesma
I fidn it interesting what some consider associated with "soul"- like smiling.
Why does that indicate a soul for you?
I don't mean to argue that this child or any other has or doesn't have a soul- I am not sure what that term signifies for others.
Originally posted by Limbo
For further reading/research.
en.wikipedia.org...
rense.com...
I remember reading about a case of some guy with a good IQ having no evidence of a "brain" at all.
Apparently the fact that you _can_ survive without a brain casts doubt on our current understanding about the brain.
Limbo
Originally posted by Lawgiver
reply to post by AQuestion
How interesting. In a world where stem cell research is limited by laws guiding what can and cannot be done in the name of science, how convenient it would be if there was some way to bring a person into this world that lacked a soul, or what we might consider the origin of a soul. A body, or a receptacle of body parts, including the most valuable parts if stem cells, which could be harvested since there's no consciousness. To say that science cannot manipulate the embryo so that it is born without a brain... Is it possible, probable? Experimentation to see how lomg a body born without a brain can actually live and grow. A brave new world
Originally posted by The Cusp
That's too bad he died. He would have made a great US President.
Originally posted by AQuestion
Originally posted by Bluesma
I fidn it interesting what some consider associated with "soul"- like smiling.
Why does that indicate a soul for you?
I don't mean to argue that this child or any other has or doesn't have a soul- I am not sure what that term signifies for others.
Dear Bluesma,
Firstly I want to say that I like your new picture better than the old one, not that my opinion on it matters. Just a kudos on your picture selection.
For the purposes of this thread, I am happy to limit the idea of a soul to the concept of sentience. The child seemed self aware and aware of what was around it. If one believe that we are born, die and are only conscious while are bodies are alive then at least for that time period we had a "soul". Peace.