It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Activists and homeowner evicted from foreclosed house by SWAT team

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:36 AM
link   
reply to post by wirefly
 


Have you ever fought a cop?

When I was in LE, I had people try to fight. I won. I also had more tools to choose from the the average cop.


If you really think a single cop is nothing, then by all means, go right ahead.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:44 AM
link   
Now she knows how the Indians felt.

Well kinda, she didn't get the US Army sent after her to exterminate her.


It wasn't too long ago America's Government gave people free land to make something of themselves, so they could generate revenue and a Government could tax them.

Those families that got free land are doing GREAT today. The rest of society are just little pawns unable to survive.

I know one family who got a massive chunk of America for free not too many generations ago. They get free money just having a small percentage logged off every year.

They also generate much of their money getting people like her to rent some of their homes. And they've been selling and buying some of their same homes to suckers like her....playing the rest of America.

They'll sell a home for $240,000.......couple years go by and the home owner gets foreclosed...they buy the same property back for $60,000 at auction...Repeat process.

The old families who got free land in America long ago, their ancestors are making A KILLING today.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 10:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by macman
reply to post by wirefly
 


Have you ever fought a cop?

When I was in LE, I had people try to fight. I won. I also had more tools to choose from the the average cop.


If you really think a single cop is nothing, then by all means, go right ahead.


Oh, I see. We've had you guys come through our Dojo in Vegas. No further discussion necessary. I see where this will end.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 10:49 AM
link   
It is called a contract. It doesn't matter if the signer did not read the fine print..or felt used. If you don't pay your bills... this is what happens,

If you take note.. Romney was right about the 47%... Something for nothing..Democrat motto.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 11:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by wirefly

Originally posted by macman
reply to post by wirefly
 


Have you ever fought a cop?

When I was in LE, I had people try to fight. I won. I also had more tools to choose from the the average cop.


If you really think a single cop is nothing, then by all means, go right ahead.


Oh, I see. We've had you guys come through our Dojo in Vegas. No further discussion necessary. I see where this will end.


Ok Chuck Norris.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 07:06 PM
link   



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by wirefly
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
 

My problem isn't with SWAT. They're doing what they're told. My problem is with SWAT being called out for this.


Who should be called out when a person is in a home that belongs to someone else and refuses to leave?



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by wirefly

Evicted at Gunpoint by Wells Fargo - But She OWNS The House and has a Court Order Not To Evict !, page 1


Here's another fine example of those sweet bankers.


No, that is a separate case. Make a thread on it if you like and we can discuss the merits of that case. I don't know why you think other cases have any bearing here, only the facts of THIS case do.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 10:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by OccamsRazor04

Originally posted by wirefly

Evicted at Gunpoint by Wells Fargo - But She OWNS The House and has a Court Order Not To Evict !, page 1


Here's another fine example of those sweet bankers.


No, that is a separate case. Make a thread on it if you like and we can discuss the merits of that case. I don't know why you think other cases have any bearing here, only the facts of THIS case do.


It's already a thread. Obviously, if you'd read it, you'd know that I wasn't suggesting this had anything to do with the other. Also, I stated that it was 'another' example.
I amazed at the lack of reading comprehension on these threads.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 11:47 PM
link   
reply to post by wirefly
 


The comprehension problem is yours. The word another denotes a link, as in another foul ball can not be said if there is no foul ball before that one. Your using the word 'another' means one does have something to do with the other by way of them both being similar. Please learn proper English grammar to avoid these problems in the future. Now if you can show how these two cases are similar, then the term another is accurate, and your posting the link is meaningful in this discussion. Until then it is neither.

As a sidenote I have opinion on the cases being linked and am not saying they are not, only that I see no evidence to suggest it, I asked you to show evidence, you have not, yet you continue making these links.



posted on Nov, 2 2012 @ 12:54 AM
link   
We live in a new era where big money banks and elite rule over everyone and everything, the police are just the low rent servants who carry out the dirty work for these evil forces. America is no different from anywhere elese and if people really want freedom they need to take this country back and out of the hands of evil. We will continue to be slaves untilthis happens.



posted on Nov, 2 2012 @ 12:54 AM
link   
We live in a new era where big money banks and elite rule over everyone and everything, the police are just the low rent servants who carry out the dirty work for these evil forces. America is no different from anywhere elese and if people really want freedom they need to take this country back and out of the hands of evil. We will continue to be slaves untilthis happens.



posted on Nov, 2 2012 @ 01:01 PM
link   



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 10:40 PM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 


As they should be. It is not their property, I would expect that response if someone was preventing me from occupying my home or selling it. The banks have the same right. We have a legal system for a reason, they should use it instead of breaking the law.



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 05:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by purplemer
 


As they should be. It is not their property, I would expect that response if someone was preventing me from occupying my home or selling it. The banks have the same right. We have a legal system for a reason, they should use it instead of breaking the law.


A bank is not a person. Nor should they be granted the same rights. Your statement holds true only if you put the values of economics and law above the values of humanity..




top topics



 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join