It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dreine
The short term 'boom' in employment for construction/electrical/etc contractors will not be enough to offset the massive costs of recovery, rebuilding, debris removal, lost revenue due to the East Coast being out of commission for a few days. Also consider the many IT and service people who will be unable to work in the near term as the region tries to get back on it's feet.
Only long term, stable jobs will result in any meaningful economic bounceback.
The only catastrophre that tends to be profitable is war, and that is extremely avoidable.
Hurricane Sandy Create JOBS? , Rebuild America Employing more people!! HAVE YOUR SAY!,
Originally posted by olaru12
Hurricane Sandy Create JOBS? , Rebuild America Employing more people!! HAVE YOUR SAY!,
Ask the people of the Gulf Coast if Katrina was instrumental in rebuilding America and creating jobs.
I think you will find the answer to be a resounding NO!!
In a real life example, scientist and environmental activist David Suzuki has often claimed that a corporation polluting a river adds to a country's GDP. If the river has become polluted, an expensive program will be required to clean up the river. Residents may choose to buy more expensive bottled water rather than cheaper tap water. Suzuki points to this new economic activity, which will raise GDP, and claim that the GDP has risen overall in the community although the quality of life surely has decreased. Dr. Suzuki, however, forgot to take into account all the decreases in GDP that will be caused by the water pollution precisely because the economic losers are far more difficult to identify than the economic winners. We do not know what the government or the taxpayers would have done with the money had they not needed to clean up the river. We know from the Broken Window Fallacy that there will be an overall decline in GDP, not a rise. One has to wonder if politicians and activists are arguing in good faith or if they realize the logical fallacies in their arguments but hope the voters will not.
I'd need to know your definition of economic gain, but if you are only considering these two transactions, your cash stays the same, but society has benefitted by gaining two holes.
Is there any economic gain if you pay your neighbor $1000 to dig a hole in your backyard and he pays you $1000 to dig a hole in his?