It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RedDragon
You could design the simluation to do whatever you want to do. What are you trying to say?
Originally posted by RedDragon
By the way, I dont believe in the simulation theory either
This kind of thinking irritates me to no end. Sorry to say that. But your beliefs don't matter. What matters is what you know and then deducing logically off of what you know.
Beliefs can arise from feelings and feelings don't dictate reality. Logic does.
There are a lot of things I want to believe in: god, the tooth fairy, etc. But I just can't.edit on 10/28/12 by RedDragon because: (no reason given)
If I interpret what you are saying correctly, you might be assuming a rather lengthy "if then" statement for every "object". While that might be one approach, more sophisticated methods might be employed to get that level of detail with the only limitatation being memory size. "objects" have "properties". how they interact and behave is determined by how they are defined. so designers would not have to include any details but the objects would be "intelligent" enough to do this on thier own. I really have no idea what I am talking about.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by RedDragon
My personal opinion is that we're living in a simulation. With the computing power we'll have by the end of the century, we'll have created a near infinite amount of simulations just as 'real' as our world.
In my opinion, a 'simulation' is doubtful.
Day after day, weather erodes the surfaces of buildings, mountains and even the paint on window frames.
Particles are sheared off and blown elsewhere by winds.
*If* our existence was a simulation, would such microscopic details be part of the program? Would the implied intelligent designers include features that dictated one limestone block would erode at a different rate to another? Might they insert some coding whereby some autumn leaves fall later than others?
God, I hope not! First DOS is an Operating System. Secondly, you would be limited to 256 colors and very choppy and pixilated graphics. Probably limited to one room with no exit. Duke Nukem 3d comes to mind...
Originally posted by nerbot
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Would the implied intelligent designers include features that dictated one limestone block would erode at a different rate to another? Might they insert some coding whereby some autumn leaves fall later than others?
Oh-oh!....you're talking about god aren't you?
Bet he didn't use DOS for this baby.
Originally posted by nerbot
Originally posted by RedDragon
If something inside a simulation is intelligent enough, it can influence things in the simulation to do things that cause interactions with the real reality. That sentience then gets a real body in the real reality and really exists.
So wrong! You seem to forget that a computer only does what it's told to do from a pre written set of instructions written by a human in the first instance. Any 'sentience' you refer to is an illusion and is just the results of all the instructions.
Originally posted by nerbot
Originally posted by RedDragon
You could design the simluation to do whatever you want to do. What are you trying to say?
I think what they are trying to say is that there are limitations.
The real world has nuances that cannot be replicated acurately enough to create anything resembling real.
Which is why I referred to god earlier.
Originally posted by Putyournamehere
Originally posted by RedDragon
If something inside a simulation is intelligent enough, it can influence things in the simulation to do things that cause interactions with the real reality. That sentience then gets a real body in the real reality and really exists.
Are you for real?
Originally posted by RedDragon
What nuances can't be replicated and why?
Originally posted by RedDragon
I'm an open-minded guy.. Honestly believing they will be biological is very close-minded. It's just accepting what you think they will be and not thinking further (logically of course).
Originally posted by kalisdad
Originally posted by RedDragon
I'm an open-minded guy.. Honestly believing they will be biological is very close-minded. It's just accepting what you think they will be and not thinking further (logically of course).
saying that they could not be biological is closed-minded.
if you were open-minded, you would know that they could come in many varieties, including biological, technlogical, pure energy, and perhaps many other forms that we can not even comprehend.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Are we talking "The Matrix" or "Terminator". Are we real people in a simulation or a computer program interacting with the real world?
Originally posted by thektotheg
Actually, this was almost EXACTLY what I was expecting. lol. Way to think inside the box. If you manage to involve religion, I'll score 100% on expectations.