Are all the South Facing Cams In Antarctica - Out-Of-Service?

reply to post by Soylent Green Is People


I was more thinking along the lines of when Nibiru is not reflecting the sun light it's unobservable because it may be a proton's emitter.

reply to post by Hydrawolf


You are right,I have thought that you could see two different sources of light.I believe that they have known about the 2nd sun since at least the 70's my Grandfather worked at NASA for 38+ years and would never talk to much about a lot of things and there in lies the problem because he always wanted to discuss his work and scientific knowledge with anyone that would listen (as a true scientist would).
anyway great catch! THE SHADOW DOES NOT LIE! :lo

Originally posted by Hydrawolf
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People

 

I was more thinking along the lines of when Nibiru is not reflecting the sun light it's unobservable because it may be a proton's emitter.

OK...
...So why were the webcams disabled? Were they able to see this body this does not reflect light?

If so, then if it could be seen by South Pole webcams, then couldn't it also be seen by Australian webcams pointed in that direction?

reply to post by Soylent Green Is People


I never said that the out of service webcams captured the object.

And like I have already said a couple of times I don't trust the images on the webcams.

I also am not convinced that everything that can be seen in Antarctica can also be seen in Australia.

But that's just me. I don't trust in that general rule thing that we live by.

What seems obviously true isn't necessarily true.

The governments never lie and sometimes they make their own truths and others agree cos it's easier and less traumatic that way.

I think the angle of approach has alot to do with it as well, and if Nibiru is a proton's emitter and can only be occasionally glimpsed under the right conditions and via reflections from the sun, maybe this proton's emitter depending on the angle and it's relation to the Sun can only be viewed from the South Pole.

Who knows?

Feel free to post an essay in response.

But none of us really have a clue in the whole scheme of things.

Originally posted by patmac573
reply to post by Hydrawolf

 

You are right,I have thought that you could see two different sources of light.I believe that they have known about the 2nd sun since at least the 70's my Grandfather worked at NASA for 38+ years and would never talk to much about a lot of things and there in lies the problem because he always wanted to discuss his work and scientific knowledge with anyone that would listen (as a true scientist would).
anyway great catch! THE SHADOW DOES NOT LIE!

:lo

Sorry, but if there is a 2nd light source able to cast shadows that way in Antarctica, it would do so everywhere in the southern hemisphere. Not just Antarctica.

And, based on the strength of those shadows, it would be very visible, lighting up the night skies in the southern hemisphere. I think that it would be impossible for people living south of the equator to not notice that.

It never ceases to amaze me at how people can think that something can be out in space, and only visible in Antarctica. It's physically impossible, unless it's a very small object, only a few hundred miles up.

Nibiru is suppose to be a planet 4 times the size of Earth (or a brown dwarf, minimum 15 Jupiter Masses, or a red dwarf, minimum 75 Jupiter masses....all depending on what stories you desire to believe in, IE Stichin, Nancy Lieder, etc).
If it were only a few hundred miles away from the South Pole, (besides being a very catastrophic situation), it would fill the entire sky of the southern hemisphere. And if it's not that close, but still very far out, it would be again, visible to every single person in the southern hemisphere.......

But here is where people will then say "but it can only be seen in the IR spectrum" or "it's a Black Body and does not generate nor reflect any light."

To which I say: Fine. Then it can not cast extra shadows of visible light.....DOH!

Just curious...
What would you accept as "proof"?
Judging from what you already don't believe, there isn't anything anyone could post that you would believe.
Kinda makes the thread pointless, in my view.

reply to post by subject x


Well I won't be posting any more responses.

Maybe a few people learnt some stuff.

I learnt a couple of things, maybe even you too.

If the thread is pointless, why did you post?

You posted for a reason.

To make a point.

Goodbye.

reply to post by Chadwickus


I love watching op's get there cods walloped. thanks

Originally posted by Hydrawolf

I also am not convinced that everything that can be seen in Antarctica can also be seen in Australia.

But that's just me. I don't trust in that general rule thing that we live by.

What seems obviously true isn't necessarily true.

Here is a graphic showing an object only 20,000 miles in space (that's INSIDE the orbit of geostationary communications satellites, which orbit at 23,000 miles). As you can see, there is a clear line of sight from most of the Southern Hemisphere to the object:




I mean, people in Australia can see the Southern Cross, and people in most of the Northern Hemisphere can see Polaris (the North Star).

Originally posted by Hydrawolf
If the thread is pointless, why did you post?

To see if there was anything we could supply as "proof" that you would accept.
I thought I made that clear.

Originally posted by subject x

Originally posted by Hydrawolf
If the thread is pointless, why did you post?

To see if there was anything we could supply as "proof" that you would accept.
I thought I made that clear.

edit on 26-10-2012 by subject x because:

All proof should be submitted via webcam. That should validate it.

reply to post by eriktheawful


Apparently nibiru theory is made of alien modified Play-Doh. It can be anywhere, in multiple locations simultaneously. It can be photographed while invisible. nibiru can absorb all light, reflecting none yet shine like a second Sun while allowing light to pass right through it so as to not present a black void in the sky or Space obscuring stars or any other light behind it.

This is simple Astrophysics 101 at YouTube University.

I mostly posts in these threads when I see people being ignorant of some very basic things. No insult intended to those people at all, but just want to help them have a dose of common sense is all.

I see Soylent posted a pretty good pick giving an example of why something out in space would be visible to others and not just the south pole. Here is another one. Anyone can do this, just use Google earth, orient the center on the south pole, and zoom out:



As you can see, not only can you see Antarctica, but you can see South America, South Africa, Australia and NZ. This LOS (Line Of Sight), means that if you can see those places from this far out........they can see you too. That is what Line Of Sight is.

But people can do other things to prove this, and it does not require a degree in science of any kind, nor does it require anyone to trust the government, or NASA or JPL, or some web cam......all it requires is for someone to trust their very own eyes. And if you don't trust those, I can't help you.

Take a camera, be it a cam corder, web cam, iPhone, etc, and place it on a table pointing up. Now take a ball like a volley ball. Mark on the ball where the south pole would be, then put "X" where each of the places I mentioned above would be. Hold the ball over the camera (the camera being "Nibiru" or whatever).
Now take a look at your pictures and/or video.

Look at how you can see the other Xs that are not the south pole.

Now reverse it. Find an object this is spherical in shape, that you can cut into, and mount your camera on it, say in the same position as Austraila, face the camera to the south.
Place an object on the table and hold your sphere object with the camera mounted on it over this object.

Again, you'll see from the camera's video/pictures that you do not have to be at the south pole to see the object.

Still don't believe it?

Look at the moon. It's around 1,500 miles wide and 250,000 miles away. The earth is basically a sphere, so let us put the south pole at the equator, like say the Panama Canal. When the moon is directly over head at the Panama Canal, guess what? You'll see it just fine way up north in Canada......and you'll see it way down south in South America, just fine.

What about a "light source" casting shadows?

No problem. Look at the sun. Light source. Now look at the Earth. When the sun is visible in North America, casting shadows, it is also casting shadows in South America........it's lighting up exactly 1/2 of the sphere that is our planet.
It does this with our Moon too, and all the other planets.

Why?

Because if you scroll back up and look at Soylent's picture they posted, that is why. It's simple geometry.

Again, no one has to take my word for it. Do the things I suggested and take a look for yourselves. You don't have to trust me, or any government agency at all.

I have a cousin whose best friends sister dates a high profile astrophysicist. He said he knows someone that has information being hidden from us about Nibiru. Apparently it is coming in low and from the South. just under perihelion apogee and hidden in the waster radio waves cast off by ALL OF THE TRANSMISSIONS ON eARTH.

THE END IS NEAR!!!!!

Originally posted by eriktheawful

Originally posted by patmac573
reply to post by Hydrawolf

 

You are right,I have thought that you could see two different sources of light.I believe that they have known about the 2nd sun since at least the 70's my Grandfather worked at NASA for 38+ years and would never talk to much about a lot of things and there in lies the problem because he always wanted to discuss his work and scientific knowledge with anyone that would listen (as a true scientist would).
anyway great catch! THE SHADOW DOES NOT LIE!

:lo

Sorry, but if there is a 2nd light source able to cast shadows that way in Antarctica, it would do so everywhere in the southern hemisphere. Not just Antarctica.

And, based on the strength of those shadows, it would be very visible, lighting up the night skies in the southern hemisphere. I think that it would be impossible for people living south of the equator to not notice that.

It never ceases to amaze me at how people can think that something can be out in space, and only visible in Antarctica. It's physically impossible, unless it's a very small object, only a few hundred miles up.

Nibiru is suppose to be a planet 4 times the size of Earth (or a brown dwarf, minimum 15 Jupiter Masses, or a red dwarf, minimum 75 Jupiter masses....all depending on what stories you desire to believe in, IE Stichin, Nancy Lieder, etc).
If it were only a few hundred miles away from the South Pole, (besides being a very catastrophic situation), it would fill the entire sky of the southern hemisphere. And if it's not that close, but still very far out, it would be again, visible to every single person in the southern hemisphere.......

But here is where people will then say "but it can only be seen in the IR spectrum" or "it's a Black Body and does not generate nor reflect any light."

To which I say: Fine. Then it can not cast extra shadows of visible light.....DOH!

Not to mention that an object of this size and mass, being that close to Earth would have a gravitational field that would have invoked every natural disaster imaginable and we'd all be dead by now.

Geesus.... A web cam goes offline and it's prove "they" are hiding something - but they installled a web cam, just so they're busy then editing the feed, rather than not install one at all. The face palm award goes to.......

Has nobody noticed what time of year it is. Christmas is just around the corner and it's obvious Santa is testing his latest Stealth Sled in Antarctica to stay away from prying eyes. He had his elves disable the South facing cameras so the testing would not be seen.

Dude if you can't understand what's happening at Neumayer after watching this www.youtube.com...#!

Then something is wrong.

OP the reason why the cams are down is because obviously something is going on.

If anyone has been watching Neumayer footage you will know (REGARDLESS OF YOUR BELIEF ON NIBIRU) that the footages are changing. And I don't mean solstice change.

Neumayer should never have light on the back of Neumayer prior to the sun rise. Then the sunrises and you see the back of Neumayer dark? So what's lighting up the back of Neumayer prior to the sunrise?

It's common sense.

For the cams to be down. Pretty easy on that one too.
Obviously something being hidden.

reply to post by Hydrawolf


You speak as if the Antarctic is populated by millions of people, and has security cameras all over the place. The reality is that there are more people in the Sahara than there are in the Antarctic. I would not be at all suprised to find that the camera at this station is one of the only ones in a five hundred mile radius. Also, if the station has multiple cameras, and the weather conditions are too harsh for one of them to operate, then it stands to logic that the same weather event will be effecting the other cameras on site as well.

It is one of the most inhospitable locations on this planet, so do not be suprised that there arent many cameras out there. Its not a suprise, or remotely weird.

reply to post by TrueBrit


So why put a camera there?

This could be about the approach of our binary "star". Nibiru is supposed to be visable first in the southern skies. It is also 30 degrees below the elliptic plane. This would mean that southern countries would see it first.