It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by antonia
This isn't serious and the headline should have tipped you off to that-"Comrade Capitalists"? It's red baiting. This is nothing, nothing will come of it and it will get tossed out.
Originally posted by gps777
reply to post by adjensen
If ATS was still giving out "Way above top secret awards" as they used to,you would have just recieved my vote.
That was some great digging on the law firm and to the topic adjensen.
So all in all,this isn`t really news,its dodgy advertising for a dodgy law firm.
edit on 26-10-2012 by gps777 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Whenever someone brings the corruption to light it is always about attention seeking?
Why not just ADMIT you want the bilderbergers to get away with stealing trillions of TAX-PAYER dollars? It is probably not out of your pocket anyway, so why would you care?
I swear the hypocrisy around here is choking!
Originally posted by gps777
How I feel about this and banks in general,I expressed in my first post in the thread and considering I`m not in even in your country,one would think that was pretty clear.
But carry on riding on your imaginary high horse,bringing down the bilderbergs with your ridiculous post about me on a worldwide online forum.
Yeah be careful you don`t choke on your hypocrisy.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
The hypocrisy is that you and Adjensen(a known disinfo agent) actually believe that the government has the interest of the people in mind when going after the lawyers who were jointly filing against the offshore companies that were laundering the money.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I apologise for not reading your first response, but your second response was quite an antithesis to the first.
The hypocrisy is that you and Adjensen(a known disinfo agent) actually believe that the government has the interest of the people in mind when going after the lawyers who were jointly filing against the offshore companies that were laundering the money.
If you were the corrupt government would you not do the same thing? It is NOT rocket science.
Originally posted by gps777
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I apologise for not reading your first response, but your second response was quite an antithesis to the first.
Actually your wrong again,due to adjensens digging and researching the law firm (well done again),my warnings on "I would not hold my breathe if I were an American" in my post,was simply because I`ve been alive quite a while to know how corrupt the bamks and Gov are toward the people.
"The State Bar has shut down the practices of the attorney defendants. They are: Kramer & Kaslow, Philip Kramer, Mitchell J. Stein & Associates, Mitchell Stein, Christopher Van Son, Mesa Law Group Corp. and Paul Petersen."
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
If you noticed there is MORE THAN ONE lawyer being charged with fraud. If this does not smack of conspiracy then nothing does. Yeah lets believe the government!
Originally posted by gps777
Conspirasy against the lawyers? could very well be both are corrupt as each other.Would you really be comfortable with both these lawyers and Gov with 43 trillion of your dollars?
Change Lawyers and run with it.
Comprende
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
No. Its not the lawyers and their firms that have a problem, its the government that has a problem.
SEVEN LAW FIRMS before filling class action lawsuits had no problem with the law. then suddenly they got sued and perhaps disbarred because of alleged fraud. The government(state of california) was implying that the results were not quick enough for the plaintiff or something to that effect, which is absolute hogwash.
The lawyers were loosely affiliated and hired more than 100 marketers to send mass mailings nationwide. The mailers, which looked like an official government notice, routinely indicated that they were a “legal settlement notification” and that the recipients “would become a named plaintiff.” They gave the impression that a settlement was imminent, the recipient should act quickly or lose out, and often outlined goals such as a $75,000 settlement, loan forgiveness, a 2 percent interest rate or a 90 percent chance of winning.
www.calbarjournal.com...
Please think harder before replying again.
Anyway I am not one of those homeowners in default, nor do I have any affiliation with the aforementioned law firms. Its the evil hypocrisy that gets to me, or people not even reading the source they use.
Originally posted by RogerT3
reply to post by longlostbrother
Marketwatch.com - (Wall Street Journal!) - does that qualify as news?edit on 26-10-2012 by RogerT3 because: (no reason given)edit on 26-10-2012 by RogerT3 because: (no reason given)
News & Content Distribution: Engage Opportunity Everywhere
Press release and content distribution for every goal and every budget
Whether you're promoting a new product, announcing an organizational change or launching a new marketing campaign, you can leverage PR Newswire's distribution network to achieve your objectives. PR Newswire offers distribution solutions for all types of organizations, including small businesses, non-profits, public interest organizations, and enterprise-level companies.
With PR Newswire, you can:
Deliver your news straight to credentialed journalists, bloggers and key influencers all over the world and online
Reach domestic as well as international trade magazines and reporters, and distribute in their native languages
Get the attention of multicultural audiences and take advantage of our Hispanic newslines
Establish your own news and industry credibility by using a trusted newswire
Engage your audiences with your message through the inclusion of photos, logos, video and more
Archive your multimedia assets for use by journalists and members of the media
www.prnewswire.com...
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by adjensen
Ok. Lets try one more time....
Several law firms that were involved in filing joint cases on behalf of the victims, were sued by the state of california on fake pretenses to block the initial suits from having a chance of succeding. Class action lawsuits are complicated and thus take a long time.
The government does not want the mortgage victims to get any exposure, because when push comes to shove the government agents resposible for the derivatives fraud and the bankers would get exposed.
Comprende?
Originally posted by Merlin Lawndart
I just noticed that CNBC has removed the original article. Did anyone get a screen shot?