Can you explain to me why you think that the people above the impact points should be all intact?
I would be delighted if you could fill me in on your theory.
Most of the people who reportedly died were trapped, unable to escape, above the
damaged floors. According to the government line, the weight of the upper floors
progressively crushed the lower floors, leading to the ultimate collapses of both towers.
But what caused the crushing of the upper floors, according to these government accounts?
There was nothing above them!
So these upper floors (being strong enough apparently to crush All the weightier floors
below to the ground) should have pretty much surfed the decent, being cushioned by the
resistence or dampening encountered on the way down.
Of the 2000 plus bodies trapped, most of them should have remained in tact, and
indeed many should have been expected to survive.
But instead NO intact bodies (or body parts) were found anywhere (along with none of the
contents of both buildings).
And that is because there were NO bodies (or contents) to begin with.
This explains the necessity for the multitudes of photoshopped/faked 'victim'
photographs and the speed in which the 'missing posters' went up in NY (within 48 hrs.).
We (the televisual spectators) were treated to faked video and a contrived and concocted
narrative, in what was really the controlled demolition of the pre-emptied and pre-prepared
buildings.
9/11 (as presented) was a faked media extravaganza.