WCPO news website showing presidential election results!!!

continued from last post:
I suspect it's all a sham and that the votes don't count anyway, I suspect they made the decision among themselves long ago who the winner will be. (then there's the whole electoral college thing, which I don't completely understand; do the electors have to account to anyone that they voted how they were 'supposed' to? Are most voters aware of how it works? I'm gonna look that up right now, lol, I keep meaning to.)
Anyway, why make it easy for them? I say, get proof, when/if the numbers don't add up, force them to be outed for the lying cheating scumbags they are!

It does seem that something still isn't right about all this. Just another reason I feel voting is a waste of time.

I kinda have to agree with alot of posters.

Showing the early votes especially in a key state for electoral college points..
If that is what these are...make's ya look at it and go ohh well why vote for the looser they are loosing by this many ect...
But i got a bad feeling about this election people..
Just to much weirdness is going on.

Originally posted by KentuckyMan

Originally posted by Sissel

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Here you go dude..

How Odd..
I don't know how it works, could these be absentee votes or something being counted early?

People are allowed to cast early votes by mail, But the title of the thread leads one to believe that the election has already been decided, especially in the opening post.

Early votes do not indicate the outcome.

I got no idea how many people live in ohio or indiana lol
If there already showing results already and it says 100% what am i to think? lol

Not trying to mislead ya i assure ya

What it is showing you is that 100 percent of the VOTING PRECINCTS have counted votes ....... or "reported votes" for tally ...

if that helps?

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Hey, stupid question here...but are we to believe these huge corporate news organizations have no ability to test system function WITHOUT engaging the full public display?? Uhhh... How many people here have a website and do live update or beta/alpha testing on the LIVE PRODUCTION site? I've met a few over the years who did...but they weren't running websites very long either.

I gotta wonder if the public was meant to see that and wonder, if nothing else..? It seems sloppy beyond description to see not only the midwest affiliate do it on a website but the Television broadcast someone had brought earlier as well. ( ?? )

Well Rabbit when you hire people based on low salaries this is what you get .... low information workers who can't think but only do what is asked of them.....

They could clearly test that off the live air...... it is just a graphic keyed over by the video switcher.....

Obama is leading in the early voting in Ohio

reply to post by KentuckyMan


Well I wouldn't be surprised as OHIO determines the election, if you win OHIO you win!!!!. Also let me point out I live in Cincinnati and don't know anyone that has voted early. Not 1 person. That said it doesn't surprise me that WCPO released this. I think someone is wanting to release information early as this is not the first time, maybe to be noticed for ratings or maybe to get some truth out there.

During 9-11 WCPO broke a story that flight 93 landed at Cleveland Airport. Now you can go back and look that up for yourselves but since then many lies have been said about this to make it look like wrong info or hoax or whatever. I think that is B.S and very typical case of "oh our information was wrong" What makes more sense they got the flight number wrong and passengers or they said the truth and then were told to reissue a statement saying incorrect information on the biggest day in recent us history? (don't forget that BBC released that tower 7 fell an hour before it fell)

So i would not doubt that WCPO has this info and released it, whats the difference it won't effect anything whatsoever. If you want real change quit voting or write my name in.

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


I put my husband on the job last night to screenshot and save this and the article from the daily caller about the AZ "results" that flashed on the screen during a TV program yesterday. I know several others I follow on twitter are on top of it also.

reply to post by Xcathdra


Yes, this interesting, to say the least. Thanks for sharing.

Just another resource on it, if anything, some of the comments are worth reading
texasdarlin.wordpress.com...

If you are seeing results prior to Nov. 6, 2012, please note that these are NOT results of the election/early voting results, but rather a system test. We apologize for the inconvenience.

From the linked site in the OP... It is a test

~OkieDokie

A video of the accidental airing is here:

reply to post by KentuckyMan
At that website you put up the link to it says "If you are seeing results prior to Nov. 6, 2012, please note that these are NOT results of the election/early voting results, but rather a system test. We apologize for the inconvenience."

reply to post by LynnBellair


That was after the fact it had been released, no? Never the less, put this kind of early announcement on another subject like the stock market. If you release those numbers early, you're in deep $h!+...the same should go for this kind of reporting....or misreporting...or disreporting.

I think an earlier post summed it up nicely: I don't know what's real anymore. FYI: not voting for Obama or Romney.

Lima-1, out.

Originally posted by OkieDokie

If you are seeing results prior to Nov. 6, 2012, please note that these are NOT results of the election/early voting results, but rather a system test. We apologize for the inconvenience.

From the linked site in the OP... It is a test

~OkieDokie

Pics or it didn't happen!

Man I pull a shun
delphi tech

Originally posted by 3chainz
Obama is leading in the early voting in Ohio

3 chainz! My favorite Obama supporter! How was your weekend, sir? I hope it was good.

Obama is leading Ohio, but that's only because that's what you're being told. You see, like all things, voting machines have a God. It just so happens that their God's name is DIEBOLD. This is how the Diebold story goes:



I don't hate you, 3chainz, I just think you're voting for Obama because you're uninformed and misled by certain media outlets. Possibly family members.

I've got a $100 Federal Reserve Note that says Obama wins this election because Diebold (or any-like software) says so.

WAKE UP, 3chainz.

Lima-1, out.

wait i live in ohio and havent voted yet....does this mean my vote doesnt matter anyways?

reply to post by Agit8dChop


Early voting = OK
Early counting = NOT OK

Upon clicking the link, I see this message:

"If you are seeing results prior to Nov. 6, 2012, please note that these are NOT results of the election/early voting results, but rather a system test. We apologize for the inconvenience."

So, would have to guess that they showed Obama winning? My best guess is that they used the excuse of a "test" to make people think everything was decided, and discourage voting for anyone else.

reply to post by KentuckyMan

Did anyone happen to notice the caption at the top that sasys: "If you are seeing results prior to Nov. 6, 2012, please note that these are NOT results of the election/early voting results, but rather a system test. We apologize for the inconvenience."

Read more: www.wcpo.com...

reply to post by SNutley


Yes, I saw that, but I also know that I don't believe it was a "mistake". Same day they do that, there was a TV station that did the same thing? Some "coincidence". I think they are trying to discourage voting.