It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by ascension211
Usually when someone wants to believe in a UFO and they get told it's actually Venus, Jupiter, a helicopter, lens flare, internal window reflection, Chinese sky lantern, bugs and birds, or any number of other identifiable things, the resulting replies can get unpleasant.
Nobody likes to have their shiny UFO taken away and replaced with Venus.
Must be the work of those Blue Beam agents.
Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to post by ascension211
I considered the "from the future" theory but I am not holding too much credence in that. After all, if you were from the future, would you not be doing something about the issues in the present? If these things are us from the future, what is their purpose here if all they are doing is observing and evading us? What value is that as a human from the future observing the inequities in the present?
I am sorry but I just don't see any human logic in that theory.
Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to post by spiritualarchitect
I mean, let's not kid ourselves. A certain percentage of these vehicles or objects are man-made. A vast majority of what we witness are natural occurrences or explainable phenomenon. My good friend Druscilla would agree with this.
However, the unknown 2-5-10%ers, or whatever percentage, are unidentified. These objects may be organically unidentified creatures or just plain unidentified inter-planetary/inter-dimensional drones/vehicles here for whatever reasons.
I keep thinking of that huge flying object that the Peruvian pilot tried to shoot down but according to him, his rockets and ammo just "bounced off or were absorbed" by the object. Maybe technology from the future could do this but ask yourself what is the point of testing tech from the future in today's environment?