It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s story about having “binders full of women” brought to him while assembling his Massachusetts state cabinet years ago is not true, according to a Boston Phoenix report Wednesday morning.
While Romney did get a binder listing qualified female candidates after being elected governor in 2003, reporter David S. Bernstein said, it was assembled not by his staff, but by a coalition of groups led by the bipartisan Massachusetts Women’s Political Caucus, which started collecting the information in 2002 as part of the Massachusetts Government Appointments Project (MassGAP).
“They did the research and put together the binder full of women qualified for all the different cabinet positions, agency heads, and authorities and commissions,” Bernstein said. “They presented this binder to Governor Romney when he was elected.”
According to the caucus and MassGAP, Bernstein said, women accounted for 14 of Romney’s first 33 senior-level appointments. But on Tuesday, Romney took at least some credit for making that happen.
“One of the reasons I was able to get so many good women to be part of that team was because of our recruiting effort,” he said during his debate with President Barack Obama.
The Huffington Post noted that, according to a study done by MassGAP five years ago, women went from making up 42 percent of Romney’s administration in 2003 to 27.6 percent in November 2006, shortly before he left office.
Bernstein also questioned the placement of Romney’s women appointees Tuesday.
“Those were almost all to head departments and agencies that he didn’t care about — and in some cases, that he quite specifically wanted to not really do anything,” Bernstein said. “None of the senior positions Romney cared about — budget, business development, etc. — went to women.”
"To be perfectly clear, Mitt Romney did not request those resumes," Jesse Mermell, a former executive director of Massachusetts Government Appointments Project, told reporters during a conference call arranged by the Democratic Party.
First, his answer to a question about the grave subject of wage inequality flaunts his gender bias: In his anecdote, Romney ostentatiously refuses to consider qualified applicants just because they’re men.
Second, Romney in this instance was hiring for positions largely about optics: He wanted women in his cabinet so he could say he had women in his cabinet. He recruited women to be women—not cabinet members.
Third, the binders response raises the specter of a still more hideous idea. Before answering the question, Romney had been reminded that women earn about 72 percent what their male counterparts do—and his response was to say, “Exactly! That’s why, given half a chance, I hire women!” Bottom line, Romney recruits women because they look good and they come cheap.
Originally posted by Dustytoad
reply to post by longlostbrother
OP's Title: Romney had no binders full of women - yet another stupid lie
"While Romney did get a binder listing qualified female candidates after being elected governor in 2003, reporter David S. Bernstein said, it was assembled not by his staff, but by a coalition of groups led by the bipartisan Massachusetts Women’s Political Caucus"
Hmm.. Maybe your title should switch to reflect the actual lie..
It wasn't that he "had no binders" It was that they were given to him, not searched for by him.
And while I don't like Romney, this is dumb to be even talking about. Why should I care about a binder?edit on 10/18/2012 by Dustytoad because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nixie_nox
I dont care if he is lying or not, the jokes going around this morning are giving me laugh after laugh.
ERMAHGERD SER MERNY BERNDERS FERL ERV WERMERN
lmao
I am so grateful he said it.edit on 18-10-2012 by nixie_nox because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nixie_nox
Actually, the fact that it is quickly turning into a meme could really hurt him.
note that in Romney’s story as he tells it, this man who had led and consulted for businesses for 25 years didn’t know any qualified women, or know where to find any qualified women. So what does that say?
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by longlostbrother
I basically like what Wil Wheaton said:
note that in Romney’s story as he tells it, this man who had led and consulted for businesses for 25 years didn’t know any qualified women, or know where to find any qualified women. So what does that say?
Romney, however, did not have a history of appointing women to high-level positions in the private sector. Romney did not have any women partners as CEO of Bain Capital during the 1980s and 1990s.
But number two, because I recognized that if you're going to have women in the workforce that sometimes you need to be more flexible. My chief of staff, for instance, had two kids that were still in school.
She said, I can't be here until 7 or 8 o'clock at night. I need to be able to get home at 5 o'clock so I can be there for making dinner for my kids and being with them when they get home from school. So we said fine. Let's have a flexible schedule so you can have hours that work for you.
Originally posted by Surfrat
Over 5 million women have just left the work force during the last 4 years. Fewer women are working today than when Obama took office. And so of the people who have been hit the hardest are women.
92.3 percent of the job losses during the Obama years has been women who’ve lost those jobs. The real war on women has been the job losses as a result of the Obama economy
Originally posted by kozmo
Sooooooooooooooooooooo... partisanship has apparently sapped your intellect!
You claimed that Romney lied about getting binders of women and go on to provide direct quotes that he did, in fact, receive binders of women.
So, again, I believe your partisanship has made you blind to the obvious - he did not lie.
Liberals will go to any length, including looking foolish and ignorant, to prop up their candidate.