People want to argue over the NWO?

reply to post by SimonPeter


The system of money is the problem. Letting shiny rocks or paper represent units of human labor allows assholes to horde way more than they need and use it as a weapon. When the # goes down, currency is going to be worthless. The "it's our money" argument is moot. It's our units of labor.

When I hear conspiracy theorists posit that Illuminati are hording wealth and instigate chaos at the same time, something doesn't add up.You said it yourself: the power of the mob is huge and dangerously unpredictable.The conflict will last about as long as poorly paid soldiers are willing to risk their lives for people better off than them. They don't wan't to open that box.

Re means thing as in reality is every thing.

Re public is the reality of the people, like Catholic means the only one or universal. At one time in Europe, Catholic and Christian were identical, the catholic church was the only church.

Plato's Republic described a society controlled by an elite. The elite were composed from all children who passed each of a succession of tests. Every child in the land was tested, so in a sense it was fair. It was not democratic as the elite made all of the decisions.

The Roman Republic was a representational goverment, except that in reality the rich were the only ones to have the means or free time to be goverment officials. Until the decline of the Romen Empire after 200 AD the goverment was funded largely by the members of the goverment i.e. the personal servants of the individuals in the government performed the services of government. One of the reasons for higher taxes after 200 AD was that goverment officials were being payed by the government for the first time.

The Founding Fathers sought models and examples from the past, but often commented that the American government was something new, to be based on the rule of law rather than divine selection or aquired authority.

The word Republic may have been a best fit choice rather than a precise definition, alluding to the power and virtue of the Roman Repulic, the longest lasting non-monarchical goverment in history.

So our republic is the reality of the percieved need for government. Benjamin Franklin called our government a republic. The Constitution does not call the government a republic.

I think republic means-- each person and the all of the government are subject equally to the law, and the people choose representatives to keep the law relevant, minimal and easy to interpret and administer the smallest possible government.

In other words in a republic the law rules over everyone, including the current administration.

There is no need for a NWO government or governance,.

The best countries have the best economies. The best economies are towards the free trade side of the free trade or central control dimention. All countries will be free trade eventually.

There is no first principle need for eternal government.

That is the good news

and the fact that no one in charge is going that way is the bad news.

reply to post by vegeta2002
\
Don't be fooled , the Elite have their places of refuge with their paid mercenaries to protect them . When the SHTF they will only grow richer and much harder to find . You will be struggling to find anything to feed your family and killing each other for it .
There is a direct need for the NWO global government . A Global government will issue a global currency . This has been prophesied in the bible for 2,000 years . The Mark of the Beast System where by you will receive a mark or implant in order to be able to buy , sell or trade will be implimented . We can see the technology in place now to make that possible . Never before could the Mark of the Beast be possible . Believe the bible or not we are heading for the Great Tribulation . This Iran /Israel war will start it .