It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Hmmm... they haven't quite dated the pyramid to that time have they? They have just dated something that was on top of the pyramid. That something might have found its way there after the pyramid was built.
Originally posted by Alchemst7
reply to post by LetsGoViking
Pyramid or not, are you denying the artifacts and tunnels they are finding at the sight? So its not geoemetrically a pyramid shape, there is some type of ancient building/artifact being discovered.
Originally posted by tomten
reply to post by Sublimecraft
That leaf does not make the pyramid the same age.
It makes the leaf 25000 years old, that's all!
Here is a 51.9 million year old leaf.
It is not uncommon...
Doesn't actually mean that this is the case here though. yes, lots of natural formations can look like they were constructed, and visa versa. But they are different objects, and until this molehill/mountain has some more digging done, then I'm not ready to call it fake, just because other things which are natural, elsewhere in the world, look a bit man made, doesn't mean it has to be the same here. This could be something which looks natural, but is man made. Maybe it was a hill which has had tiers cut into it, like the rice fields in the mountain of Sapa. Maybe it's not anywhere near 25000 years old. It wouldn't supprise me if it was. We know so little, but think we know so much. Vedic writings date civilisation to much earlier than 25k, they may be fabricated but you never know. We could be much older than we're being told. And I think we are.
Originally posted by tomten
reply to post by Acidtastic
There are a lot of nature made structures.
That looks like they was man made.
Just take a look at these.
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by thePharaoh
In this case Pharaod you are partially correct. The date is probably right but the material has nothing to do with the date of the hill.
The hill was formed during the Miocene and the layers date from 15 to 7 millions years ago....
Where those hills come from
As for your fear of the C-14 dating
edit on 14/10/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ImaFungi
How do they carbon date the stone to figure when they were assembled into pyramid formation? carbon from the fragments of the tools used to cut the stone? how are they not dating the carbon from when the stone was formed?