posted on Oct, 21 2012 @ 11:45 PM
reply to post by Mianeye
Bringing back dinosaurs would be irresponsible, whether we could do it or not. They had their niche in the geological record, and should be left lie.
Why bring back another species to compete for resources, when we have famine and poverty in the world? IMO, such endeavors should only be considered
once we achieve space colonization, and have a planet other than our own to implant them on. Humans and dinos would not make a good mix in today's
society. There's simply not enough room for both of us on this planet.
While true that the dinosaurs died out because of a global extinction event, perhaps unfairly ending their existence, we have no guarantees that we
won't also face extinction as well. Why, if that is the case, would we even worry about a species in the fossil record, let alone think about
reviving it?
Besides, the movie denotes a tiny mosquito trapped in amber, the blood preserved in it's belly. How did that tiny proboscis ever penetrate a
dinosaur's scaly thick hide anyway? The premise of the movie is flawed. Mosquitoes only feed on warm blooded mammals. Dinosaurs were ectothermic,
not endothermic. Uhm, can you explain that?