White House Comes Clean: No Protest Outside Libya Consulate

What the U.S administration does not want to tell, is that what took place at the CIA consulate villa in Libya,was the direct action of THE GREEN LIBERATION MOVEMENT. This is something that's not being said,because the US/NATO fascists does not want the world to know, that the real people of Libya that they overthrew, are still fighting for their country,and in the end will succeed in this effort. The REAL TERRORISTS were the US/Britain/France, and their henchmen that overthrew the sovereign thriving nation of Libya.

reply to post by gaiamon

Okay. I'll bite. Tell us more about this. I've never heard of THE GREEN LIBERATION MOVEMENT.

IAMTAT, I do understand your lack of knowledge of various things in Libya, such as the JAHMAHIRIYA system that the country was ran by. This was a direct counsel of the people of Libya,and ran by the peoples themselves,and quite different than the US non-system of governing.Would you please check out the "Green Book" by Gaddafi,as this will give you a better understanding of how the Libyan system ran before the US/NATO invasion. Also few people even know that Libya was not a member of the IMF,and did not wish to be under the thumbs of the vicious bankers that has so many other countries under their thumbs of debt. Libya was even aliening other African nations to create what was to be the "Gold Dinar", a monetary system that was not based on worthless paper money...This creation would have crushed the Europeans and their monetary systems,and thus the haste to overthrow the country that was very well self reliant.
In regards to the Green Movement", these were the great masses of Libyans that had to be overthrown,not the ragtag group of mercenaries created by the US in Benghazi. These were and are the people that fly the original green flag of Libya(now changed ). These are the over 50.000 people that was slaughtered by the destructive forces of NATO,because their mercenaries henchmen of Benghazi could not do it by themselves. In Arabic the Green Movement forces I believe are called "Tahloob", which translate as Gaddafi followers.
Take note, that a lot those whom participated in the murder of the Libyan leader M. Gaddafi, has been assassinated,set up for bombings,and on a constant basis many NATO concerns are destroyed.These things are being done by various tribes that are of the Green Movement of Libya. For sure this US administration does not wish for others to have this knowledge of their complete failure,and that they have not destroyed the peoples fight.They would rather have the sheep believe that the Libyan people love them,but in fact its the other way around,and of course those lackeys and flunkies placed in so call power by the US does love the possibility of their new position.But each and every day they are realizing that they sit in a hot seat,and must answer for the betrayal of their people and the country of Libya.
Would you please view" Libya truth",and see just what the great Libya was turned into by those devils that came with a supposed fly over to protect civilians,but with only the intentions of destabilizing yet another country for its resources.Its a shame,that before the bombs stop dropping,there was already an international bank being set up in Libya,by these dogs of war !
Now I will bite on that information that you come back with. But in the meantime would you start with this,( youtu.be... ) and( youtu.be...) and tell me and others what you think,,,,,,,Peaceeee...."Gaiamon"

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by xuenchen

 

Why the lies? Why the lies from the State Department, Susan Rice, the White House?

Did they think that they could cover for the terrorists?

I don't understand.

What I do know is that this is huge. A cover-up attempt by our government to avoid contreversy about an attack where 4 died.

Insane.

Insane huh?

I am really sickened by the Obama haters! Where were you when Bush was killing millions? Anybody?

Got awfully quiet in here all of a sudden!

I don't give one rip about this newest twist. I think everyone knows, or at least SHOULD KNOW, we are lied to on a daily basis about everything.

This will become the big reason why everyone should vote for Romney! I call BS. Romney is no better and in fact, much worse yet these people jump on the partisan bandwagon and root for "Their Guy" as if this is a popularity contest. It sickens me!

There is a 3rd candidate. If any of these Romney supporters say their vote would be wasted by voting for Johnson they are FOS. They are just partisan popularity contest players.

This is no game. Our government is playing games all over the world causing untold horrors and we are bickering about BS. This is just another example of the lies we are fed daily and yet people think Romney will be the answer? Come on.

Originally posted by onecraftydude

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by xuenchen

 

Why the lies? Why the lies from the State Department, Susan Rice, the White House?

Did they think that they could cover for the terrorists?

I don't understand.

What I do know is that this is huge. A cover-up attempt by our government to avoid contreversy about an attack where 4 died.

Insane.

Insane huh?

I am really sickened by the Obama haters! Where were you when Bush was killing millions? Anybody?

Got awfully quiet in here all of a sudden!

I don't give one rip about this newest twist. I think everyone knows, or at least SHOULD KNOW, we are lied to on a daily basis about everything.

This will become the big reason why everyone should vote for Romney! I call BS. Romney is no better and in fact, much worse yet these people jump on the partisan bandwagon and root for "Their Guy" as if this is a popularity contest. It sickens me!

There is a 3rd candidate. If any of these Romney supporters say their vote would be wasted by voting for Johnson they are FOS. They are just partisan popularity contest players.

This is no game. Our government is playing games all over the world causing untold horrors and we are bickering about BS. This is just another example of the lies we are fed daily and yet people think Romney will be the answer? Come on.

I'm sure most people were bashing bush!! I know I had my fair share of harsh criticism for him, just like most people everywhere. To be honest Obama get's bashed on but so did Bush hell he even had a shoe thrown at him and called a war criminal durning speeches even if it's true, Bush still get's bashed all the time. People know the government lies all the time but should we not be outraged that 4 american's died and Obama's team tried to cover their ass? People on this site call the government out on everything so why are you so mad about this? Now I know why you mad it's because of Johnson doesn't have a chance to win, i'm sorry I agree with him on some issues but the majority of people don't and most Ron Paul supporters say they are going to write Paul in. It's true that voting for Johnson is pretty much a vote for Obama because he really doesn't have a chance inless Romney is caught with a gay lover or kills a stripper.

reply to post by xuenchen


Wow, so the first reports were wrong, and now that more of the facts are known the WH is giving a more fact-based explanation of the Benghazi attack. Yet the Obama haters want to make a humongous deal out of it and claim it to be a scandal. Could it be because the presidential election is less than a month away and their candidate is still behind, so they are desperate to grasp at any straws that might help their cause?

The last president we had, a Republican, lied about the reasons to go to war -- illegally arguably -- against Iraq, yet where was the outrage from these folks then? Then there was the scandal with the politicization of the DoJ by forcing the dismissal of US attorneys who didn't aggressively purse Democratic politicians for trumped-up charges. Then there was the fact that the Bush WH claimed it wasn't illegally wiretapping US citizens, but then it came out that it was in fact. Where was the outcry and outrage by these folks that claim they are against big and intrusive and oppressive government? And how about the Bush II administration's stonewalling the 9/11 commission and refusing to make public what was discussed and decided in Cheney's Energy Task Force meetings. These were major issues, but the political right was, for the most part, silent on all of this.

But yeah, there was an attack at a US consulate in a dodgy, unstable country that had just gone through a civil war, and the first information to come out of the State Department was wrong, but has since been corrected.

No double standard here, huh? It is the same with the treatment of this DoJ Fast and Furious program. This program began under the Bush administration but the Republican-controlled House refused to include this in the House's investigation. I agree this program sounds bad and stupid and the Congess should get to the bottom of it, but to refuse to acknowledge that it began under Gonzalez and Holder just took it over (and may have expanded it) is again partisan double-standard grandstanding.

And no doubt, should -- heaven preserve us -- Romney get elected, these same right-wing elements will give him a pass on everything too.

Here's some more for ya !!

YouTube Caption:

FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal and a cover-up of the events on 9/11 in Benghazi, Libya. They not only report on the cover-up, but also what actually transpired on the night our Ambassador was killed.

7+ minute report.....
What do YOU see and hear ??

"Fox News Extensive Report On The Benghazi Cover-Up By The Obama Administration"

"While House comes clean"--yeah right

Originally posted by macman

Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
I'm not familiar enough with this situation --

I think you should stop after this statement.
It appears all you want to do is defend 0bama and pretend that the Govt didn't really know what was happening.

Pointing out the spin by the media and the dubious nature of some of these "whatever-Gate" things that come up is hardly being an apologist for Obama -- but that's the nature of this "with us or against us" Group. I wonder where people like this are when all their predictions turn out to be utter dreck? Not even the Libyans knew what was going on. How many times was the apocalypse supposed to happen now? Pulling a conspiracy theory out of this when there is no benefit what-so-ever for the White House, and there are no invasion excuses the administration is looking for is pretty weak.

There are things we can dislike the President for doing -- but I keep hearing the "muslim", "socialist", or "Kenyan" thing from the people who are preoccupied. Focusing on this stupid stuff that is very, very peripheral to the White House won't get you any traction.

It's almost as big a waste of time as me trying to rebut people who don't have a clue, but a lot of suspicions ... which is my cue to ignore this thread like most of these Anti-Obama threads turn out to be.

When Obama gets re-elected, it will be 4 years of Republicans trying to impeach him for "whatever" and demanding accountability while their constituents give them a pass on lining their own pockets, stalling real progress, and of course the occasional hookers and Meth they indulge in. It's an eye-opener getting a look behind the curtain of the Romney supporters.

The saga continues......

(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Lindsey Graham (R.-S.C.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on CBS's "Face the Nation" on Sunday that the U.S. intelligence community in Libya informed the administration in Washington, D.C., within 24 hours of the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya that the attack had been a terrorist strike whose perpetrators included militia associated with al Qaeda.

Graham said the fact that the administration was still publicly declaring more than five days later that the attack may have arisen as a spontaneous protest indicated that either "they are misleading or incredibly incompetent."

"Well, the facts are there was never a riot," Graham told Bob Schieffer of CBS News. "The night in question, September 11, Ambassador [Chris] Stevens was being visited by the Turkish ambassador. There wasn't a soul around the compound. And the coordinated attack lasted for hours with al Qaeda-associated militia............

'Within 24 Hours': When U.S. Intel in Libya Told Washington 9/11/12 Was Terror Attack

The White House "KNEW"

Obama HAD to "KNOW" !!

What are they covering up ?

Still Blaming Romney

:shk:

Axelrod

Axelrod Hammered Over Obama Campaign Trying To Claim Libya Only Issue Because Of Romney

Watch this phoney baloney
He tries real hard to deflect the entire mess
He appears to be on tranquilizers

"Axelrod Hammered Over Obama Campaign Trying To Claim Libya Only Issue Because Of Romney"

reply to post by VitriolAndAngst

There are things we can dislike the President for doing -- but I keep hearing the "muslim", "socialist", or "Kenyan" thing from the people who are preoccupied. Focusing on this stupid stuff that is very, very peripheral to the White House won't get you any traction. It's almost as big a waste of time as me trying to rebut people who don't have a clue, but a lot of suspicions ... which is my cue to ignore this thread like most of these Anti-Obama threads turn out to be.

If I read this correctly, it says that 'there is a lot of crap that is being blamed on Obama. This one does have traction, so I will ignore it.' Sounds a lot like on ostrich with it's head in the sand.

Obama can't ignore it, so he is doing more of the same, blaming someone else. In this case, blaming someone else doesn't have any traction.

As this scandal and tragedy continues to unfold... It has been revealed that the State Dept. has been sitting on $2Billion for Security enhancements but will not spend it. They had the money prior to, during and still have it after the attack in Benghazi.

Remember how they tried to blame lack of funding in last weeks hearing?? Just another bald face LIE!!

Full Detail:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

What gives??

reply to post by xuenchen


Axelrod is in overdrive right now and tomorrow nights debate should be quite telling.

He is now blaming the State Department as is the White House for what happened in Benghazi. They are lining the buses to back up over Hillary now!!!!!!!! I'm sure Bill is regretting every word he said at the DNC. Don't mess with the Clinton's. Expect one more Oct. surprise in the days to come. Courtesy of Bill and Hillary.....

It's a Benghazi Tug of War....

The Department of State is pushing back against top White House aides who have tried to blame it for not doing enough to defend the Benghazi, Libya, facilities prior to the Sept. 11 jihad attack.

On Friday, the department released an Oct. 9 background press briefing, during which a State Department official contradicted the White House’s claim about the video.

The move is unusual, because the transcripts of most background briefings are not released — especially if they involve a direct disagreement between the department and the White House.

And the State Department tries to blame the Intel. community.... Wow! a three way struggle to ditch the HOT POTATO

Good Stuff!!
Read more: dailycaller.com...

Another gem....

Obama bitten again....

Old Video re-kindled ..

In January 2010, President Obama addressed the nation with an update on the security review of the attempted terrorist attack and outlined the reforms and corrective actions he ordered. The President said, "I have repeatedly made it clear -- in public with the American people, and in private with my national security team -- that I will hold my staff, our agencies and the people in them accountable when they fail to perform their responsibilities at the highest levels ... Moreover, I am less interested in passing out blame than I am in learning from and correcting these mistakes to make us safer. For ultimately, the buck stops with me. As President, I have a solemn responsibility to protect our nation and our people. And when the system fails, it is my responsibility."

Obama After Underwear Bomber: 'Buck Stops With Me'

reply to post by xuenchen


The Whitehouse report initially got it wrong.

They waited 2 weeks before fixing it and correcting the information.

Is this the first time this has happened to a President in history?

What is the suggestion here anyway?

Do you think the Whitehouse was somehow involved in the attack?

I know the President has made some mishaps, he's taken the blame for this event too, but I think it is such a contentious point and big issue because it is an election year, and opponents have scant little to criticize.

His biggest negative is a heath care plan for everyone based on an outline provided by his opponent.

And now, he may have mis-represented this attack.
4 died because they ignored the signals.
It was a tragedy, no argument there, but you want to charge him for this?

GWB ignored the intelligence and we lost 2000 civilians, 2000 soldiers and are still fighting a war for it today. Now George is painting dogs.

Originally posted by xuenchen
Here's some more for ya !!

YouTube Caption:

FNC Special Report on what many are calling a scandal and a cover-up of the events on 9/11 in Benghazi, Libya. They not only report on the cover-up, but also what actually transpired on the night our Ambassador was killed.

7+ minute report.....
What do YOU see and hear ??

"Fox News Extensive Report On The Benghazi Cover-Up By The Obama Administration"

Many are calling a cover-up? You mean someone outside of Fox News and bubble dwelling Republicans?
Fox News came out the gate calling it a "staged attack" without any actual information - they just wanted that to be true. Like a stopped watch, they were correct on occasion and that day they got lucky. Ignore the 99% of speculation that turns out to be stretched truth that passes for news the rest of the time.

The White House learned about this event from the News -- and didn't really know anything until after investigations.

An ambassador made a speculative connection with the protests over the Mohammed hit-piece film because there were protests about 50 miles away over that -- and this turned out to be wrong. It was a bad call, but not a crime.

So 4 people got killed at an embassy and that's a tragedy. This could happen with a focused attack at most any embassy. There was no prior information on this event -- but that doesn't stop Fox News "and other expert sources" from saying so.

It's Libya, it's in a war zone. There's no coverup as the Media (which you guys seem to love so much), is both asking for information NOW and saying that the information needs to be better. I've read OFFICIAL comments from Obama and Hillary that were clearly; "we have nothing at this time, it's a tragedy and we are looking into it."

The lack of credibility of people screaming on this website is laughable except that they take themselves very seriously. And crocodile tears all around for someone dying from America. Anyone not for Universal Health Care and getting out of our numerous military actions to support corporate profits should just shut up about pretending to care about human life.

Ah yes.

And I see we are getting many knee jerk reactions after last night's debate.

Obama gaffed it again on Libya and they are scrambling and the phones are ringing off the hooks.

Even the moderator couldn't tighten the lid.

What exactly ARE they covering up ?

Well maybe they were so afraid of the fallout from a real terrorist attack.

Maybe that's why they made the weak attempt to shift blame to that magic video.

They were also scared half to death that the "Bin Laden" miracle would be tainted

And now all of a sudden .....

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice is changing her story

They won't let go.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, in her first public comments on Libya since her controversial account days after the attack, blamed intelligence community talking points for the faulty narrative.

The light-on-details explanation Monday came as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took responsibility for any security failures leading up to the consulate attack last month.

But with the accounts coming as both presidential candidates head into a debate Tuesday night that will focus in part on foreign policy, neither appeared to settle mounting questions on the Hill about how the administration got the story so wrong. ...................

Rice blames intel talking points for faulty Libya story; lawmakers raise new questions

But wait Susan......

Who's running the country anyway ?

Does she think she was set up ?

Incompetence, Ineptitude, general boondoggling, and fumble-futzing always gets exposed....

even when the best BeeEss'ers are working

This was a breaking news story last week; our local talk radio host connected the dots, as they were happening; so I wasn't surprised when Hillary gave a press release claiming responsibility, a few days later.