It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OOOOOO
It was said this whole thing was false flag, again with th Israelis behind it, just like they are behind the movie, the timing was all planned for the release of the movie info, which had been out for a while. The big thing was to make this happen on 9/11, false flag to make America mad at the Muslim again.
The Ambassador was killed, for one reason, is that he was good guy and the Arab people liked him, he could speak their language and knew their customs. Israel and the Saudis wanted him out
Plus our Government knew, had fore warning of this, so they say.
The false flag all goes back to the fact Israel is druling at the mouth to attack Iran, they want America to get behind this attack like the first fasle flag 9/11.
The only thing I don't understand is that they said he, the Ambassador was still alive and at the hospital. The thing is I saw him in video, being dragged down the street appearing dead and they also said at time, that he had been raped?
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
Originally posted by neo96
Why are people taking about Christians?
Since it was a bunch of right wing radical Islamists who killed an American ambassador and 3 others.
You don't KNOW the religion or politics of the people who killed the Ambassador. It benefits people trying to start a war for people to think that -- so it's important to get it right.
We DO however know that the people who made the movie that disparaged Mohammed, were Right-wing Christians, and they did it with malice, and they re-dubbed it without letting the actors know what they were trying to portray -- which if it isn't a crime of liable, it should be.
So right-wing extremist Christians; KNOWN. But we don't have any connection to that other than one You-Tube video.
There were protests in various locations, and some people attacked the Libyan embassy. That's what we know.
Originally posted by neo96
Why are people taking about Christians?
Since it was a bunch of right wing radical Islamists who killed an American ambassador and 3 others.
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
You don't KNOW the religion or politics of the people who killed the Ambassador.
We DO however know that the people who made the movie that disparaged Mohammed, were Right-wing Christians,
You don't KNOW the religion or politics of the people who killed the Ambassador. It benefits people trying to start a war for people to think that -- so it's important to get it right.
There were protests in various locations, and some people attacked the Libyan embassy. That's what we know.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
So we are blaming the White House for stupid media and stupid partisan assumptions that people like to make when things go wrong?
No we are blaming the whitehouse for continuing to tow an excuse that , again (blue in the face), was FALSE, since the information given to them BY THE PEOPLE WHO WERE JUST IN THE HEARING, clearly stated the opposite.......
Its not JUST RICE, OBAMA and the rest of his people were given this SAME information....
Why is this hard to understand?
Go watch the hearingedit on 10-10-2012 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
Here, why don't you cut and paste your little laughing icons for the next time you say something stupid as if you were genius.
There is a conspiracy in the Obama administration to look confused about an attack? They are covering up for NOT increasing security when Republicans convinced themselves with NO EVIDENCE AT ALL that there was a warning -
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
Here, why don't you cut and paste your little laughing icons for the next time you say something stupid as if you were genius.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
You don't KNOW the religion or politics of the people who killed the Ambassador. It benefits people trying to start a war for people to think that -- so it's important to get it right.
That Al Aqeda flag they raised says YES I DO.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
There were protests in various locations, and some people attacked the Libyan embassy. That's what we know.
Again, WRONG, watch the hearings........there was no protest outside the embassy, intelligence have admitted to as much......
They also admitted that it was armed militia that stormed them and it happened so fast they say they had a hard time reacting........
Had their been a protest outside the gates, then they would have been better prepared.......
You are making statements you claim to be factual, that are not.........full stop......
Educate more.....
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by gravitor
Prey tell what would drive 19 hijkackers to fly planes in to buildings Or strap bombs on to themselves?
They do it cause they think like is a video game and they actually might get to respawn?
Originally posted by gravitor
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
You don't KNOW the religion or politics of the people who killed the Ambassador. It benefits people trying to start a war for people to think that -- so it's important to get it right.
That Al Aqeda flag they raised says YES I DO.
Wake up.
I could raise a flag of the mighty mouse party, and YOU would believe the mice did it????
It's far more likely to be AMERICAN private army, it is their BUSINESS.
You reap what You sew, and America has sewn hundreds of thousands of private war based militia out there.
It's their business to create terror and blame each side .
WAKE UP.
gravitor
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
Originally posted by gravitor
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
You don't KNOW the religion or politics of the people who killed the Ambassador. It benefits people trying to start a war for people to think that -- so it's important to get it right.
That Al Aqeda flag they raised says YES I DO.
Wake up.
I could raise a flag of the mighty mouse party, and YOU would believe the mice did it????
It's far more likely to be AMERICAN private army, it is their BUSINESS.
You reap what You sew, and America has sewn hundreds of thousands of private war based militia out there.
It's their business to create terror and blame each side .
WAKE UP.
gravitor
I'm actually saying "it benefits people who might want to start conflict in the middle east" and then you tell me to "wake up" because this could be someone from the USA?
Why is everyone showing the problem of miscommunication by miscommunication -- we aren't even translating from Arabic here?
>> I said at the beginning of this event, that it COULD have something to do with Netanyahu's "War on Iran" tour and his frustration with Obama not wanting to plunge the US into a quagmire because Israel doesn't like someone else having Nukes.
We don't know who attacked the Libyan embassy and I'm VERY AWAKE to the concept that nothing in the Middle East is ever as it seems and false flags are more common than the real ones.
So YES, I agree with you -- it's possible.
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
We don't know who attacked the Libyan embassy .
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
Here, why don't you cut and paste your little laughing icons for the next time you say something stupid as if you were genius.
....... says the guy who WRONGLY tried to claim that the coptic egyptian who made the anti-islam film was a 'group of right wing christians' and that no one knew the religion of the attackers in Libya. :shk:
So what is your beef with me or the Administration other than that people READ strange things into what they said? That's your entire Obama administration conspiracy right there; people in the Media and Politics who read what they want to hear in someone's statements.