It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Screwed
Originally posted by Xquizit
Lol... Oh no, watch out! It's Nibiru!
I find it very humorous that they would put this in the News paper. Just goes to show how some people still want this to be real....
EDIT: personally I just think this is their way to work around the Nibiru conspiracy without flat out saying it...edit on 3-10-2012 by Xquizit because: (no reason given)
ummm, I'm sorry, I must have missed the part where ANYBODY said........ANYTHING about Nibiru.
Sounds like someone has an agenda.
Everything alright at home?
Originally posted by theclutch
LENS FLARE! that's it that's all!
Witnesses are bunk! You wanna know how I know? Yes you do!
Look up at the sun with your naked eye! There you go.....You CAN'T do it for more than a millisecond! Why? Because the sun is to bright on a cloud free day!
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
PlanetXisHERE, fantastic find. How any can claim lens flare when others seen it physically 1 wonders.
LOVE LIGHT ETERNIA*******
NAMASTE
Originally posted by InhaleExhale
How anyone can take tabloid media seriously must make one wonder
First, they are reposting an article. In other words, they (the reposter) could say anything they wished. I would rather that you had taken the time to find the original article than posting a repost.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Well, they are not just quoting anonymous witness sources, one person quoted in the story was the Muar Marine police chief, someone of supposed credibility and with whom the story could be confirmed.
Originally posted by InhaleExhale
So did you at least make an effort to confirm? should have been quite simple you probably could have had direct contact via phone with this police chief.
Although I suspect you have no real interest in confirmation of facts.
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Originally posted by InhaleExhale
How anyone can take tabloid media seriously must make one wonder
Why? are you saying you have proof its a lie / hoax posted in tabloid or are you making a sarcastic remark at 1 to better show you feel your in the know??
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
PlanetXisHERE, fantastic find. How any can claim lens flare when others seen it physically 1 wonders.
LOVE LIGHT ETERNIA*******
NAMASTE
To correct you, NASA has never hinted at the existence of a rogue planet in a large elliptical orbit. And since they have never hinted at the existence of said object, they most assuredly did not name it.
Originally posted by BrieBird
Why are we in such denial over this? NASA has hinted at the existance of a Rogue Planet in a large eliptical and are calling it Tyche. It was also suggested back in 1983 that something quite large was tugging on the outer planets. Having a 12 planet doesn't have to mean doom. Most solar systems are binary why would ours be any different. I suggest that we all take a picture of the sun at the apporiximate time of the siting in Malaysia ( adjust for time zone differences of course) and see what we come up with. Is it possible for so a large quantity of cameras to all produce a flare at the same time. Do our naked eyes also produce flares?
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
reply to post by saige45
1. I've read some of the dispatches from credible asian news agencies, as it does seem startling if the witnesses were honest and it does mention the same thing, even if reposted.
2. In terms of size, the object would be massively big if it is near to the sun, and burning with same or higher intensity to be that bright.
But if it was on atmosphere, it would still have to be something big, and burning to cast that glow and brightness. Fortunately, we can have an estimation of that size based upon the distance of Earth's surface to the radiation belt whereby most objects get burn up.
Most certainly a screw or small part of a booster rocket would not be picked up by the naked eye, so it has to be something bigger, perhaps bigger than a booster rocket itself, if it is even capable of reaching those heights.
However, I must add, all that is written here in this post is moot and pure speculation, as there are no evidences to support the existance of such object except eye witnesses.
Still, we need not pooh pah possibilities. Something happened, which must be explained - with facts and evidences, not just hypothesis, such as mine. It's the way of ATS.
Originally posted by InhaleExhale
to just speculate on things
and push misleading info onto the readers of ATS
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by InhaleExhale
So did you at least make an effort to confirm? should have been quite simple you probably could have had direct contact via phone with this police chief.
Ya, I called the police chief because I have nothing else better to do with my time, just like I call every other witness cited in every other mysterious story published around the world, I have a whole rolodex of contacts for bigfoot sightings, Yeti sightings, Chupacapra sightings, Loch Ness monster sightings; and also I called because even though my Malay is rusty it is workable. Ya..........right.
Although I suspect you have no real interest in confirmation of facts.
You must be a mind reader, I don't even know why you bother coming on here to get poster's opinions when you can just pick them up from the aether.edit on 4-10-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: addition
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by InhaleExhale
to just speculate on things
Isn't that what most posters do on ATS? I admit their are posters like Slayer who have extraordinary OP's, which I feel we all should aspire to, but with this subject, most of the info is covered up or subject to security directives, so all we are left with is speculation.
and push misleading info onto the readers of ATS
So my threads are weak but still have the ability to mislead ATS readers? I think most ATS readers and posters are actually quite intelligent and many actually have this ability called discernment - and would prefer to make up their own minds and not be told what to think.
I don't believe anywhere in the OP did I draw any conclusions, what conclusions did you think I was implying?