It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by awake1234
Thank you for the OP link too!
Heres an option to take action from that site!
We are sucSEEDing every day in every way for the highest good of all~
LOVE∞
mayallsoulsbefree*
Dear Sirs,
I am writing to you because of this national debate to label GMO foods. Next month in California consumers are going to vote on whether to label GMO foods or not. If this proposition 37 passes, how will grocers nation wide feel about it?
Do you want to make more money? Of course you do. I have an idea that can help boost your status with the public as well as boost your profits.
If California begins to lead the nation in GMO Food labeling and as stated in many places, 90 percent of Americans want GMO Foods labeled, then grocers can advertise and can set up isles or sections that separate the GMO Foods from non GMO foods. This way it will help consumers flock to your stores because they wont have to spend so much time reading labels. This will help get more consumers in and out of your stores more quickly. This will also give consumers a sense that the grocers really do care about thier health and food choices.
This will also serve to show the grocers which types of foods the consumers want to buy most. If you are not making money say on the GMO foods for example (or vice versa) , this will tell you not to carry those non profit making foods.
It is estimated that at least 70 percent of all foods today are GMO foods. That only leaves 30 percent of foods that are non GMO - But the public seems to be on the side of non GMO foods. It should then be a simple matter to separate the GMO foods from the non GMO foods. This will cater to the wishes of the consumers in a fashion that is positive and encourages a great symbiotic relationship between the consumers and their grocers.
What do you think of these ideas? If you like them, would you be willing to implement them in your stores?
Thank you for your time, I await your reply,
John Phoenix
Originally posted by popcornmafia
Good luck stopping them..
If achieve I hope everyone feels good about the millions
in 3rd world countries who will die over the food supply running out.
Pat yourselves on the back good job!
You have accomplished depopulation.
Originally posted by Humanity4Ever
In Canada, we have the same problem. In 2002, the government declined to pass legislation that mandated labelling food products that contained GMO ingredients.
Originally posted by Screwed
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
I promise you that if something like this were even attempted then grocery stores would be federalized or subsidized and considered a threat to national security to have it any other way.
Originally posted by Screwed
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
As I said, the result that I am looking forward to is different than the result that you are hoping for but in the end we both win.
This is a great idea but for a different reason than you are trying to achieve.
IMHO of course as always.
I promise you that if something like this were even attempted then grocery stores would be federalized or subsidized and considered a threat to national security to have it any other way.
Once you fully understand how the people who really run the show......really run the show, then you can predict their moves with 100% accuracy.
Great Idea in the sense that it would force their hand and expose themselves and their agenda to an even broader audience even more than it already has been.
The more we push, the more it forces them to push.
The harder we push, the harder it forces them to push.
Eventually it becomes clear to all but the most dumbed down, brainwashed, mentally, spiritually, and politically retarded amougst us.
www.sourcewatch.org...
The Indian SuicidesFarmers in India are finding that the "biotechnology revolution" is having a devastating effect on their crop lands and personal debt levels. "In 1998, the World Bank's structural adjustment policies forced India to open up its seed sector to global corporations like Cargill, Monsanto, and Syngenta. The global corporations changed the input economy overnight. Farm saved seeds were replaced by corporate seeds which needed fertilizers and pesticides and could not be saved" Says Vandana Shiva, leader of the movement to oust Monsanto from India in her 2004 article The Suicide Economy Of Corporate Globalisation. "As seed saving is prevented by patents as well as by the engineering of seeds with non-renewable traits, seed has to be bought for every planting season by poor peasants. A free resource available on farms became a commodity which farmers were forced to buy every year. This increases poverty and leads to indebtedness. As debts increase and become unpayable, farmers are compelled to sell kidneys or even commit suicide. More than 25,000 peasants in India have taken their lives since 1997 when the practice of seed saving was transformed under globalisation pressures and multinational seed corporations started to take control of the seed supply. Seed saving gives farmers life. Seed monopolies rob farmers of life" [1].
UPDATE: "Since 1997, 182,936 Indian farmers have taken their lives and the numbers continue to rise. According to a recent study by the National Crime Records Bureau, 46 Indian farmers kill themselves every day – that is roughly one suicide every 30 minutes – an alarming statistic in a country where agriculture is the economic mainstay".[2]
Yet even this number may be underestimated. According to P. Sainath, rural affairs editor of The Hindu, "the states where these [figures] are gathered leave out thousands from the definition of "farmer" and, thus, massage the numbers downward. For instance, women farmers are not normally accepted as farmers (by custom, land is almost never in their names).