It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by r2d246
reply to post by buster2010
Even I could make that in photoshop in an hour and I'm not a graphics designer. Come on get real ok.
Originally posted by jimmyx
i would especially like to hear their explanation of the "alligator rock" clip... i haven't seen that one. and, if it's true depiction, there needs to be an independant investigation opened up.
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by LightSource
Why bother?
Imagine trying something like that, there were so many people(400,000), private contractors, a country's pride at stake, do you think they'd take a chance like that and hope not to get caught. It would be completely illogical and the risks of a fraud being exposed would have been too high. It's usually foolish people who believe a hypothesis like this because it would have been a foolish thing to do(not directed at you).
The truth would come out eventually, and it hasn't, not one single witness, ever. If they faked footage somebody would have came forward and told the truth eventually, but nobody ever has.
Originally posted by dayve
Originally posted by r2d246
reply to post by buster2010
Even I could make that in photoshop in an hour and I'm not a graphics designer. Come on get real ok.
Doooo it....
Originally posted by tombangelta
reply to post by r2d246
That was the thrill of my life. I can't thank you enough.
I'm off to you tube to continue this joygasm.
Thank the lord.
Originally posted by dayve
Originally posted by r2d246
reply to post by buster2010
Even I could make that in photoshop in an hour and I'm not a graphics designer. Come on get real ok.
Doooo it....
Originally posted by buster2010
What's really amazing about us faking the moon landings is how we are able to get the Russians, Chinese and various other nations in on it. What about the moon rocks that were tested in at Curtin University of Technology in Bentley, Australia. Or the photos taken by the Japanese lunar probe SELENE. How did the Retroreflectors get placed there? Those are the mirrors that are used to measure the moon's distance from earth. Please work on your Photoshop because that attempt you made was laughable.
"People love conspiracy theories," Armstrong replied. "I mean, they are very attractive. But it was never a concern to me because I know one day, somebody is going to go fly back up there and pick up that camera I left."
Originally posted by aethertek
While my post is only tangential to the thread I mean for it to be on topic.
Mods...we can flag & star threads & posts, we can even unflag a thread, why can't we down flag a useless thread such as this.
Give us an option to down vote or down flag a thread to keep such nonsense off the main page.
While such a useless thread may still be created it will be relegated to the section where some may find it interesting while not wasting bandwidth for the rest of us.
TIA
Originally posted by r2d246
Originally posted by buster2010
. What photos by Jap probe? Retrorelectors were either not there or photoshopped in. Mirrors could be from lunar rover missions in the past..
Originally posted by mazzroth
Ok this is what more than likely happened with the moon landing, the Yanks were positive of getting there and back even through the Val Allens Radiation belt but they were not confident with Hasselblads ability to video the event so they had a contingency plan. This plan involved switching over to a remote desert location and uploading the feeds so the event wasn't marred by poor playback or completely whited out images spoiling the event.
The reasoning behind this ? well with an event so important with the Russians so close to landing rovers on the moon within months they had to have top notch footage which could not be guaranteed, so some big nob made the call to just run with the hoax footage and hence the problems with lighting and numbered rocks which are definitely questionable. These errors out weighed having gone on holidays and not having good snaps to prove it.
This would cover just about everything that sums up the "Moon Landing Conspiracy" I would think.
As of now I'm still on the fence but my present contention is that Humans went to the moon, however they didn't film it for one reason or another, but in order to rally people around a patriotic event in the space race they created a televised event for added drama. After all America is a television culture.
Originally posted by mazzroth
Ok this is what more than likely happened with the moon landing, the Yanks were positive of getting there and back even through the Val Allens Radiation belt but they were not confident with Hasselblads ability to video the event so they had a contingency plan. This plan involved switching over to a remote desert location and uploading the feeds so the event wasn't marred by poor playback or completely whited out images spoiling the event.
The reasoning behind this ? well with an event so important with the Russians so close to landing rovers on the moon within months they had to have top notch footage which could not be guaranteed, so some big nob made the call to just run with the hoax footage and hence the problems with lighting and numbered rocks which are definitely questionable. These errors out weighed having gone on holidays and not having good snaps to prove it.
This would cover just about everything that sums up the "Moon Landing Conspiracy" I would think.