It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Earlier in August, fisherman Vitaly Vershinin saw two creatures near Myski village, according to a local Siberian newspaper.
'Sailing up the river I saw on the bank what I thought were two bears,' he said. 'They were drinking water.
'When they noticed me, they easily stood straight upright and went away... I did not wish to chase them.'
Siberian Times
In a separate account, the fisherman took a Vesti TV crew back to the spot where he allegedly saw the yetis.
'We shouted to them - do you need help?', he said, initially thinking the creatures were humans. And they just rushed away, all in fur, walking on two legs, making way through the bushes with two other limbs, straight up the hill, right there,' he added, pointing.
Fisherman Vitaly Vershinin shows Russian Vesti TV crew where he saw the 'creature'; below - GV of the river by Myski village
'What did we think? It could not be bears, as the bear walks on all-fours, and they ran on two.... so then they were gone.'
It was reported that several days after this sighting 'local people saw a strange creature one more time'.
Siberian Times
Officials in Kuzbass, Kemerovo region, told of another alleged sighting.'We were sailing in a boat without an engine. On the rock above the Mras-Su River we saw some tall animals looking like people,' said locals who have not been named.
'Our binoculars were broken and did not let us see them sharply. We waved at the animals but they did not respond, then quickly ran back into the forest, walking on two legs.'
He stressed: 'We realised that they were not in dark clothes but covered by dark fur. They did walk like people.'
Siberian Times
One was spotted this month by an unnamed state inspector in the Shorsky National Park, says local government official Sergei Adlyakov.
'The creature did not look like a bear and quickly disappeared after breaking some branches of the bushes,' he was quoted as saying.
This case was in Tashtagolski district, close to the border with Khakassia, it was claimed.
Siberian Times
Originally posted by christafinias
www.abovetopsecret.com...
same region and description different encounter (2 years ago)
To me this makes it more plausable that Yeti exists
Originally posted by Franz von Humboldt
Originally posted by christafinias
www.abovetopsecret.com...
same region and description different encounter (2 years ago)
To me this makes it more plausable that Yeti exists
Oh yes! It is so much more believable now that Yeti exists. The fact that a creature with supernatural ninja stealth and survival skills can't swim adds a lot of credibility to its existence.
Originally posted by Franz von Humboldt
reply to post by christafinias
Well, I don't think vodka-loving russians in the middle of the tundra make good eyewitnesses.
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
Originally posted by Franz von Humboldt
reply to post by christafinias
Well, I don't think vodka-loving russians in the middle of the tundra make good eyewitnesses.
Actually, I think that local communities know much more about the wildlife in their regions than some idiots sitting on their computers happily inside their houses and surmising about what different people on multiple occasions may or may not have seen.
Way to stereotype, and also to have a thoroughly Western perspective.
Also, it doesn't take "supernatural stealth" to evade biological surveyors, *and* I don't see what swimming has to do with anything. Lots of primates can't swim.
Just sayin'.
Originally posted by Frocharocha
The biggest problem on proofing it's existence is, what does a Yeti eats? There's not alot of food in the Himalayas, i can't imagine how worst is in the winter. Unless Yeti like any bear, passes it's time hibernating of course.
Anybody knows if any big animals or fruit variety can be found in those regions?
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
Originally posted by Frocharocha
The biggest problem on proofing it's existence is, what does a Yeti eats? There's not alot of food in the Himalayas, i can't imagine how worst is in the winter. Unless Yeti like any bear, passes it's time hibernating of course.
Anybody knows if any big animals or fruit variety can be found in those regions?
The yeti is probably not a bear... historically it's been referred to as a hominid-type primate. If people can survive in the Himalayas, then theory is that there is enough food for a yeti. Roots, berries, foliage, grasses, and lichen are all present in the area and would be likely food sources. It's also possible that they hunt, in which case they may eat small rodents, fish, who knows. I don't know.
Large animals found in the region include snow leopards, bears, foxes, wolves, martens, black bears, tahr, and yak. Another large species could absolutely subsist on flora and fauna of the region.
Originally posted by pritishxsinha
Yeti are believed to be a hominid primate that lives in pretty cooler regions. It can be possible. Their evolution process can be like polar bears. Polar bears have separated from brown bears at very recent time during 0.6 million years ago or less. We know before 2 million years ago, there were variety of Hominid creatures roamed the world including humans. But slowly the hominid creatures started disappearing, may be due to fights between themselves as they were lot intelligent and one had to survive. Till 1 to 0.6 million years ago even, there still existed many species of humans. But there could have been possibilities of some hominids escaped to the cooler regions for survival just like polar bears and these hominids had evolved white fur so to be protected. Being a hominid creature, they must have evolved a knowledge to be protected from rising humans may be during the same age of evolution of polar bears or they became interdependent to these polar bears and evolved to live like them. Today we call them Yeti who knows and understands the importance of hiding. There are even many and many news comes often about yeti to be seen in Himalayan regions. It is true that Hominids are those families of apes who have evolved into extremes sometimes like see us or gigantopithecus, who were huge creatures of 1.5 millions years ago and even much after..
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
reply to post by christafinias
Actually, I think that local communities know much more about the wildlife in their regions than some idiots sitting on their computers happily inside their houses and surmising about what different people on multiple occasions may or may not have seen.
Way to stereotype, and also to have a thoroughly Western perspective.
Also, it doesn't take "supernatural stealth" to evade biological surveyors, *and* I don't see what swimming has to do with anything. Lots of primates can't swim.
Just sayin'.