It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ken10
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by dontlaughthink
reply to post by SpearMint
So you read it's impossible... good research eh?
No, I know it's impossible because I have more than a basic understanding of energy and the laws of thermodynamics, which perpetual motion violates.
You are an attention seeking liar.
But perpetual motion only requires a moving object not be affected by other forces !!!
I think people are getting confused with Free-energy, which has more output than input.
You call BS... and me a liar.... so you don't want to know, fair enough.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Then why not do it.....
Instead of making us think that you are an attention-seeking troll?
Originally posted by dontlaughthink
reply to post by SpearMint
At last a question... lets see how many comment on my what you need post.
Originally posted by Ulyeney
Originally posted by butcherguy
Then why not do it.....
Instead of making us think that you are an attention-seeking troll?
It is obvious who the attention-seeking trolls are in this thread.
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
reply to post by butcherguy
Butcher guy, perpetual has never meant forever, as forever is nonsense. Nothing is "forever" not even space or time. You are interpreting it to mean "forever" which is nonsense. If a man makes a machine and it runs for the length of his life without outside energy added, it would be labeled as perpetual motion, by every scientist on the planet. Stop using semantics to try to argue your point. It is not based in rational thought.
Originally posted by Wongbeedman
Oh by the way guys wanna see my Stargate to another dimension in time and Space?