The victim's families of 9-11 just let Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield and Rice walk away?

Do people in this country have any testicles?

I guess they got a check. But the money would be gone by now.

Data on why you're stating this?

Originally posted by CynicalDrivel
Data on why you're stating this?

We are not supposed to go after the poster.

But who in the hell are you?

lolwut?

I'm not going after you, I just want to know WHY? 2 line rants don't make a full discussion. Explain, expound, where's the info you are reacting to in the first place?

And what does it matter who I am?

Originally posted by CynicalDrivel
Data on why you're stating this?

I can make this post every day until the end of time.

Every day.

First they would have to prove Bush and company had something to do with 9/11. Without evidence there is no case.

Of course you can, but you do know the purpose of a forum, right?

So why don't you get the ball rolling and file a law suit and prove with the facts and evidence that you have complied and go after the sons of guns and make them pay for their crimes for the 911 incident .

Or would the whole cost of the legal battle maybe a little heavy for you?

reply to post by sonofonehunlo

Some of the victims' family members are awake (and are fighting), others arent.

They got their $1.5 million dollars in hush money.

But the truth seekers will forge ahead.

reply to post by buster2010

Oh, I've read enough about motivation (which they do try to establish in court cases), but never anything on direct evidence....unless we want to go into the 9/11 conspiracies. lol. All sorts of accusations, there.

Originally posted by CynicalDrivel
lolwut?

I'm not going after you, I just want to know WHY? 2 line rants don't make a full discussion. Explain, expound, where's the info you are reacting to in the first place?

And what does it matter who I am?

You did nothing wrong.

Well anyway, this will come up again and again.

reply to post by sonofonehunlo


You kind of lost me on this one too. Are you saying we should string people up because it is your opinion that they did something? We don't do that here, if there was ACTUAL proof of them being responsible then yes, they should be held responsible. But there's not. Hence the term conspiracy "THEORY". You can't convict someone of a crime just because you think they did something.

Originally posted by freedomSlave
So why don't you get the ball rolling and file a law suit and prove with the facts and evidence that you have complied and go after the sons of guns and make them pay for their crimes for the 911 incident .

Or would the whole cost of the legal battle maybe a little heavy for you?

The victims families are not the same as the general public.

Some one in your family is dead? And you do nothing and say nothing?

Why did you have a family or come from a family. There is nothing between your legs.

Originally posted by sonofonehunlo

Originally posted by freedomSlave
So why don't you get the ball rolling and file a law suit and prove with the facts and evidence that you have complied and go after the sons of guns and make them pay for their crimes for the 911 incident .

Or would the whole cost of the legal battle maybe a little heavy for you?

The victims families are not the same as the general public.

Some one in your family is dead? And you do nothing and say nothing?

Why did you have a family or come from a family. There is nothing between your legs.

Guess you missed the point

Originally posted by freedomSlave

Originally posted by sonofonehunlo

Originally posted by freedomSlave
So why don't you get the ball rolling and file a law suit and prove with the facts and evidence that you have complied and go after the sons of guns and make them pay for their crimes for the 911 incident .

Or would the whole cost of the legal battle maybe a little heavy for you?

The victims families are not the same as the general public.

Some one in your family is dead? And you do nothing and say nothing?

Why did you have a family or come from a family. There is nothing between your legs.

Guess you missed the point

Explain to me in the language a 5 year old could understand what the point is.

I repeat, there is nothing between your legs.

reply to post by sonofonehunlo


Sorry I will break it down ... thought with your 2 liner rant you shouldn't need to read a complete paragraph to under stand a little common sense. or is there nothing between your ears there son.

what proof is out there that ties these people you mentioned to 9/11
I didn't realize that youtube videos of peoples theories about what happened on 9/11 would hold up in a supreme high court as proof . The truthers and some theories have some excellent points . However Hiring lawyers to take on the american government would be rather expensive wouldn't you think. If there was any real evidence do you really think they will just hand it over to the lady who wants to sue the former government.

So what I am getting from you these people should sell everything they own in a court battle they will lose?
Or am I wrong?

Originally posted by buster2010
First they would have to prove Bush and company had something to do with 9/11. Without evidence there is no case.

End thread. Sorry fella's but conspiracy theories don't count as proof !

Also,OP.you fail. You make zero sense. I think you're just fishing for stars OR trying to get a rise out of people with your title. nice try though