It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheLonewolf
[
Just like religious people...Really?
Peace
Yeah, really..Ever try to rationally explain something to a conspiracy theorist or religious person?..Does not go over to well. Why? Because you/they are set in their beliefs and do not wanna hear anything to the contrary..I don't expect you to understand, because after all you are a conspiracy theorist. Correct? Just because someone speculates on a theory/topic does not make it correct..Even if it makes more since than the original explanation..Sometimes the truth is stranger/lamer than fiction.That's a fact
That article you linked to credits Alex Jones, David Icke, and Gerald Celente as credible sources..nothing more needs to be saidedit on 21-9-2012 by TheLonewolf because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CynicalDrivel
reply to post by RealSpoke
Wait, you've never seen a conspiracy proven? How long you've been on here?
Here's one.
Here it is continued.
From now on, conspiracy theorists should be described as public intelligence analysts. We are part of a public intelligence community whose headquarters is the entire world. The public intelligence community has bases in North America, Europe, Latin America, Africa, China, Russia, and the Middle East. Our loyalty is to truth, freedom, and peace.
Originally posted by jude11
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
the innerweb has dumbed the population down to the point the the apollo moon landings are commonly thought of as "fake" be people who don't even know how many missions there were
must be all the flouride
It's all a conspiracy I tells ya!
I believed the moon landing when I was six and watched it happen. Then a few years ago, someone brought up the conversation of maybe it didn't happen at all. Then there are pictures, interviews, people taking apart and examining the photo evidence etc.
After all of the counter arguments provided even of late, if I didn't at least question the possibility of it being faked, I would be labelled a sheep by many.
Am I a sheep or alternative thinker?
I like the latter.
Peace
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by jude11
Conspiracy theorists have been proven right about so many issues and historical events, with 9/11 being the most important among them. The views of conspiracy theorists are more popular than ever because they are telling the truth.
Really? I didn't know truthers claims to have been proven true.
Fail article
Originally posted by TheLonewolf
Yeah, really..Ever try to rationally explain something to a conspiracy theorist or religious person?..Does not go over to well. Why? Because you/they are set in their beliefs and do not wanna hear anything to the contrary..I don't expect you to understand, because after all you are a conspiracy theorist.
Originally posted by orbitbaby
From now on, conspiracy theorists should be described as public intelligence analysts. We are part of a public intelligence community whose headquarters is the entire world. The public intelligence community has bases in North America, Europe, Latin America, Africa, China, Russia, and the Middle East. Our loyalty is to truth, freedom, and peace.
I just got myself a new title! Haha....I'm a public intelligence analyst. See my avatar. Thanks Jude!
Almost isn't going to cut it. For instance: if I'm really set in my ways, and my ways are of paranoid contrariness, then I'm going to automatically be an "alternative thinker" while maintaining my own personal "status quo". See, the "straw man" here is assuming that "not accepting the status quo" is the same as "not having set beliefs".
Originally posted by theMediatorThe whole point of being a conspiracy theorist/alternative thinker is almost DEFINED by not accepting the status quo which is totally the contrary of having set beliefs and not wanting to hear all sides of a story.
There's 2 different groups in religious thinking: the "having set beliefs" and "having dynamic beliefs". You can have individual set beliefs that are mainstream or alternative, and no one really will change them. You can have individual dynamic beliefs that are genuinely affected by every single thing you hear out there. Either extreme is going to kill you. There is no growth in a "religious mindset" when you have fully set beliefs. People need to spiritually grow up, just as much as they need to physically grow up. Being too "dynamic" means that you're going to believe everything you're told both for and against your beliefs, and you will change, giving yourself the appearance of hypocrisy. In the end, it's that your words and decisions condemn you daily, too far in this extreme.
I really don't see a strong connection between religious thinking and alternative thinking.
There are a million different ones, for all I know they believe in holograms.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by jude11
Which 9.11 theory has been proven true?
There are a million different ones, for all I know they believe in holograms.edit on 22-9-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)