OMG - Obama has got to be the most corrupt President we've ever elected

washingtonexaminer.com...

10-part Series

The Obama you don't know....I'm speechless.

Here's some nuggets to chew on:

He's lied about his childhood. He's lied about his time as a "law professor". He's lied about his time as a "civil rights lawyer" (he was actually negotiating deals with real estate investment firms that left a major portion of the poor black community in South Chicago homeless). His 1997 speech on Valentine's Day shows that his entire strategy in to enslave the poor to buy their votes. He's worked with and accepted donations from about a half dozen people who have either ended up in prison for corruption/bribery or are attached to terrorism. He raped the pension plans in Illinois for the benefit of cronyism and getting donations/power. And lastly he continued all this corruption into office with the UAW bail-out for GM and padding his donators/connections with the energy funds.

Can't someone arrest this man and prosecute him?

I wouldn't say the *most* corrupt.

I haven't forgot the Bushes just yet.

Anyway, Obama's just a half black puppet, they had to throw a curve ball to deflect from the fact many people are no longer thinking along the right/left apsect.

Icing on the cake as far as I'm concerned is stating he was going to close Guantanamo and then invest another 40 million into it!! aha.

Your tears will be delicious come November 8th, and not because I'm an Obama supporter, but mainly because I enjoy watching conservative moan.

Originally posted by TheOneElectric
Your tears will be delicious come November 8th, and not because I'm an Obama supporter, but mainly because I enjoy watching conservative moan.

And that statement rectifies the issue at hand how? How does your sentiments toward "conservatives" address the fact the man has been and is still operating in a manner that calls for criminal charges? How does your statement address that he has presented himself as having been and having done things that are simply untrue? How does that fix the ethical issues and malfeasance of his LIFE? And how does that make him "okay" in light of the way he has acted?

Exactly what part of your voiced hatred toward the political side you are "against" makes these things okay?

In other words, what I'm asking you, is since when is our country's leader selected and supported without regard for his own criminal and corrupt acts simply because "it will make the people you don't like cry"?

It is just my opinion that no president has been any more or less corrupt than the previous president, rather the speed and clarity with which information now travels, and the greater ability through electronic means to dig deeper into the political manure pile just lets us all see it more clearly.

Think about it . . . twenty years ago in order to research almost anything, you had to have insider knowledge or wait for the book to be printed . . . if it ever was printed. Now, you can see the skid marks in the shorts of damn near anyone by simply calling up Google and typing a few words.

The realilty is, there's just fewer places for the politicians to hide their evil doings.

reply to post by Sinny

Agreed.

Most of these Presidential pawns are scum bags. Thats the only way that the establishment will allow them to be elected.

Dont waste your vote on one of two establishment minions.

I've been looking, but I can't find anything to back up any of these allegations. I have to admit, I didn't read the whole thing, but I didn't come across anything illegal... It looks like a load of hearsay to me. In the Examiner, no less. Two months before the election, no less...

It's going to take more than that to convince me of the truth of these... what amounts to rumors and speculations.

Be prepared for the floods of "youre just a racist" posts to come pouring in

Obama is not a person, but an intelligence asset. the only reason for replaceing him with mitts romney is that a new set of corruptocrats have to be brought out of the darkness and installed, exposing them to the light.
and maybe some of obamas corruptocrats will be prosecuted, giving a few more hidden details to th epublic.

Originally posted by TheOneElectric
Your tears will be delicious come November 8th, and not because I'm an Obama supporter, but mainly because I enjoy watching conservative moan.

Its going to be the tears of the ignorant who bought into the crock of lies come time
they start paying for healthcare under the Obamacare mandate, that or they pay the
escating fine billed by the IRS every year.

What a long winded hatchet job.

The usual rhetoric with no primary sources to back it up.

It'll be fun to see it torn apart.

Originally posted by BritofTexas
What a long winded hatchet job.

The usual rhetoric with no primary sources to back it up.

It'll be fun to see it torn apart.

What the hell are you talking about? The sources are named in the article.

reply to post by Valhall


Do you mean "X said this", "according to X"?

That's hearsay. Not a primary source.

Originally posted by TheOneElectric
Your tears will be delicious come November 8th, and not because I'm an Obama supporter, but mainly because I enjoy watching conservative moan.

If he is reelected,,,,,,, Who's he going to Blame this time?

Has anyone listened to this woman? She's Funny.

Corrupt you say,,,, I think he is, But what do I know? I know nothing of Socialism or Redistribution of Wealth and Collective Farms and Work Camps or an Education System that teaches the Values and Doctrine of One Man and the Government and any deviation from that could be a life sentence or death penalty. I know nothing of being brainwashed to believe in one man as the guiding light and your only Hope for a Future.

S & F for starting this thread and being brave enough to Stand and Take The Flaming and Name Calling I sure you'll have come your way.

Originally posted by BritofTexas
reply to post by Valhall

 

Do you mean "X said this", "according to X"?

That's hearsay. Not a primary source.

Brilliant. So named sources (many of which are liberals/Democrats) are now lying. Because stating their statements of what Obama did or said is just "hearsay" equates to you stating their statements can't be taken as honest.

Anything to win your case, right? I'll remember this moment.

Originally posted by Valhall

Originally posted by BritofTexas
reply to post by Valhall

 

Do you mean "X said this", "according to X"?

That's hearsay. Not a primary source.

Brilliant. So named sources (many of which are liberals/Democrats) are now lying. Because stating their statements of what Obama did or said is just "hearsay" equates to you stating their statements can't be taken as honest.

If it was the usual op ed piece then, yes, he said/she said is usually acceptable.

But this is a 10 chapter opus hatchet job masquerading as investigative journalism. For that I believe we deserve the primary sources.

Anything to win your case, right? I'll remember this moment.

Please do.

Originally posted by BritofTexas

Originally posted by Valhall

Originally posted by BritofTexas
reply to post by Valhall

 

Do you mean "X said this", "according to X"?

That's hearsay. Not a primary source.

Brilliant. So named sources (many of which are liberals/Democrats) are now lying. Because stating their statements of what Obama did or said is just "hearsay" equates to you stating their statements can't be taken as honest.

If it was the usual op ed piece then, yes, he said/she said is usually acceptable.

But this is a 10 chapter opus hatchet job masquerading as investigative journalism. For that I believe we deserve the primary sources.

Anything to win your case, right? I'll remember this moment.

Please do.

Primary Sources:

Barak Obama
David Mariniss
Edward Shanahan
Law student evaluations from University of Chicago Law School
Richard Epstein, University of Chicago Law School Senior Lecturer
Robert Alt
Lisa Bernstein
govtrack.us
Marilyn Katz
Judson Miner, senior partner in Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland
Eddie Read, president of the Black Independent Political Organization
Robert Stark, director of the Harold Washington Institute for Research and Policy Studies
Wardell Lavendar
Robert Fitch
Michael Hudson, economist at the University of Missouri-Kansas City
Cynthia Canary, former head of the Illinois campaign for Political Reform
Dr. Conrad Worrill
Cheryl Johnson
Hazel Johnson
D'Anna Carter
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Urban Institute
Prairie State Blue
Former Illinois Senator Peter Fitzgerald
Steve Rauschenberger
Chris Lauzen
State Senator Dave Syverson
State Senator Terry Link
Paul Green, director of the Institute for Politics at Chicago's Roosevelt University
John Rogers
William Atwood, executive director of the Illinois State Board of Investment
Ray Hanania
The Chicago Sun-Times
Elie Maloof
Ali Ata
Stuart Levine
Peter Schweizer

Obama's school records
Obama's records as a "professor" (which he was not)
Obama's publication record
Obama's record as a lawyer
Obama's record as a senator
Obama's record of donations received (both senate and presidential)
Obama's record of appointments he made
Obama's record of funding recipients

Mainly the historical record.

We let the last president get away with the mass murder of 3000 people in a false flag attack in NY... Nobody cared about the shadiness of that day or the lies that followed.

Why start caring with Obama? Is any of that worse than 9/11?

Originally posted by spiritualzombie
We let the last president get away with the mass murder of 3000 people in a false flag attack in NY... Nobody cared about the shadiness of that day or the lies that followed.

Why start caring with Obama? Is any of that worse than 9/11?

Just a reminder...

Everybody knows you never go full retard.

- Kirk Lazarus