It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ladyteeny
reply to post by Druscilla
knowing a lot of things doesn't mean knowing everything, despite how much you'd like to convince people of that.
i've been trained in my fields, and again, i know what i've seen. and no amount of condescending attitude from you is going to change that. maybe you need to get out a little more and look upwards instead of sitting on the internet ridiculing things you think you know.
it might not be your fault, but your attitude is quite rude with regard a subject about which nobody can be certain. on record anyway.
Originally posted by whyamIhere
Originally posted by ladyteeny
reply to post by Druscilla
knowing a lot of things doesn't mean knowing everything, despite how much you'd like to convince people of that.
i've been trained in my fields, and again, i know what i've seen. and no amount of condescending attitude from you is going to change that. maybe you need to get out a little more and look upwards instead of sitting on the internet ridiculing things you think you know.
it might not be your fault, but your attitude is quite rude with regard a subject about which nobody can be certain. on record anyway.
I love both of your posts...
This arrogant condescending attitude is all over ATS.
Some of us want to learn and discuss.
Others think they are so enlightened it is laughable.
They are the one's telling each other how smart they are.
If people want to discuss lights in the sky.
They should be allowed freely discuss this video.
I seems like their massive insecurities demand constant reassurance from each other.
Originally posted by Druscilla
Please, everyone, anyone, with respect, please, please, please stop posting "lights in the sky" videos, or simple orbs.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by Nurelic
What does 'flying in formation' boil down to? What's a formation? If you put 3 or 3000 of the same objects in the air, by the simple act of nature, they WILL be in some type of formation opposed to, stacked up on one another.
I think we're using that word erroneously.
Originally posted by bluestreak53
Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by Nurelic
What does 'flying in formation' boil down to? What's a formation? If you put 3 or 3000 of the same objects in the air, by the simple act of nature, they WILL be in some type of formation opposed to, stacked up on one another.
I think we're using that word erroneously.
I think that he was meaning the objects seemed to be moving "in synchronized movement", the same direction, keeping in relatively the same position to each other - as opposed to moving in random directions and velocities.
Of course, if these are balloons that are being moved by fairly uniform wind currents, that would account for this "movement in formation". (They certainly look like Chinese lanterns)
At least, that was my interpretation of what the witness was saying.
Originally posted by Druscilla
Please, everyone, anyone, with respect, please, please, please stop posting "lights in the sky" videos, or simple orbs.