Never a Terror Attack Before Elections...Guarenteed!!!

I guarentee there will be NO terrorist attack prior to the elections. Why? Because an attack will make everyone scared and want to re-elect Bush who loves this war on terror and the terrorists want Bush out. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if the republicans staged a terror attack just for the effect. A terror attack prior to elections is never going to happen.

You say you can guarantee that there will not be an attack but you wouldn't be surprised if the republicans staged a terror attack just for the effect.

So you will also guarantee that it will be partly sunny in most of the country tomorrow but you would'nt be surprised if there is some rain in parts?

I don't think there will be an attack but it bugs me that one of the Senators closed his office in D.C. because of the threat. I would like Tom Ridge to come out and give us an update.

Jemison

It would be nice to see Big ear Ridge again, after all we hav'nt seen him since that last scare they gave everyone.

Maybe he can come out and say that since we have not had attacks that they will be lowering the level to a nice rosey pink color. That should make Bush supporters happy.

What if the terrorists WANTED Bush in power? They could be working on the assumption that Bush in power will alienate the US further in world politics and render them unable to effectively continue the war on terror?

Makes ya wonder if it was the Republicans who attacked on 9/11 to begin with,

If that's what you're getting at?

Originally posted by BANGINCOLOR
I guarentee there will be NO terrorist attack prior to the elections. Why? Because an attack will make everyone scared and want to re-elect Bush who loves this war on terror and the terrorists want Bush out.

BANGINCOLOR, unfortunately nothing is guaranteed. But you do have a valid point.
If the Kerry/Edwards ticket gets into office, i think there will be an attack on U.S. based
interests, purely to test the 'mettle' of the new administration.

Sanc'.

Originally posted by sanctum

Originally posted by BANGINCOLOR
I guarentee there will be NO terrorist attack prior to the elections. Why? Because an attack will make everyone scared and want to re-elect Bush who loves this war on terror and the terrorists want Bush out.

BANGINCOLOR, unfortunately nothing is guaranteed. But you do have a valid point.
If the Kerry/Edwards ticket gets into office, i think there will be an attack on U.S. based
interests, purely to test the 'mettle' of the new administration.

Sanc'.

And this of course would be pulled off by the Republicans right?
Just like 9/11? Opps I mean just because Kerry is in office?



[edit on 15-10-2004 by evecasino]

What if the terrorist attack is aimed at the building Bush will be in? Did you think of that? Wouldn't it be interesting if they killed both Bush and Kerry? Then maybe we could start looking for a worthy candidate.

Originally posted by BANGINCOLOR
I guarentee there will be NO terrorist attack prior to the elections. Why? Because an attack will make everyone scared and want to re-elect Bush

Then why the attack in spain, that resulted in the conservatives being ousted and Spain dropping out of the war on terror? Aznar was a 'strong' ally/support of bush.

"Then why the attack in spain, that resulted in the conservatives being ousted and Spain dropping out of the war on terror? Aznar was a 'strong' ally/support of bush."

Great point.

I think the terrorists were banking on the anti-american sentiment that europe has and it worked. I feel an attack would have the opposite effect here, in america.

The Spanish people are as low as the French in my book now. They let the murderers from Morocco change the government! In America we can do better. We won't let the Habibs influence the election regardless of who it would help.

Originally posted by BANGINCOLOR
I guarentee there will be NO terrorist attack prior to the elections. Why? Because an attack will make everyone scared and want to re-elect Bush who loves this war on terror and the terrorists want Bush out. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if the republicans staged a terror attack just for the effect. A terror attack prior to elections is never going to happen.

So Bush need an attack to be reelected, ok.
So bush need no attack to be reelected, ok.
Dem need an attack, Rep need an attack.

In fact, if someone want to use an attack for those elections, this attack has to be well think and done.
Terrorists (if they are not from the CIA) don't carre about Bush or Kerry, the army and defence will be the same with the same people, the war will be the same, the president will obey to the pentagon and CIA. And the terrorists will continue to destroy Iraq, Islam and kill the real resistants and journalists that help them to tell about the army abuse and mass murders, and help Bush to control the world and the oil that terrorists don't care or want to attack, strangely, when it is what is paying the invasion and get Iraq poorer.

Stupid terrorists!

Originally posted by verfed
The Spanish people are as low as the French in my book now. They let the murderers from Morocco change the government! In America we can do better. We won't let the Habibs influence the election regardless of who it would help.

Maybe you should look into opinion polls before the elections, many Spaniards were against the government for going in to Iraq.

The French public dont want French troops to go into Iraq, the French government realises this and are representing the peoples opinion, or in other words being democratic.

[edit on 17-10-2004 by TPL]

Originally posted by TPL
Maybe you should look into opinion polls before the elections, many Spaniards were against the government for going in to Iraq.

Yes, but they also were in favour of the conservatives over the socialists. If nothing else, the socialist victory was a surprise, people certainly weren't calling it before the attack.

I don't think its really possible to predict, either way, what the terrorists want. They could want people who will get involved in the middle east, because that woud bring about war and they want war. They could want people who will pull out, because, well, they specifically said they want the west out, and then when they're gone they'll launch their own war. So i don' t think one can vote based on what one thinks the terrorists want.

No attack........guranteed.

so you are guarenteeing that every terrorist org in the world is either incapable of launching an attack, or, if capable, all know for certain that an attack would result in a bush win and thats what all the terrorist groups want? And they want this bush win because that will mean they can loose more wars in the middle east?

Ultimately they want the west to pull out no? They might want the US to destroy every gov there now, but to soon pull out and then they can take over in the power vaccum no? You don't think any of them want the US to pull out now? You can 'gurantee' that every group wants the US and west to stay involved?

If the US stays in Iraq it is easier to kill Americans. You can just hop on a bus and put down a bomb on the roadside instead of coming to America on a jet and starting a fake life for years until finally you can kill an American.

If there is another terrorist attack, wouldn't it prove that Bush isn't capable of protecting the USA? He always says you have to be right 100% of the time.

I believe that would swing people to the Kerry side of the fence. Failing in Iraq, and now the USA. Kerry would win by a landslide, providing there was an election.

I wonder what kind of yarn he would make up to defend the position of him never being wrong.

I think it's absurd to think that terrorists care who is President of the United States.

Bush and Kerry have some differences, but in the big picture the terrorists are looking at, they're not that different. It makes much more of a difference to us here at home than it does to the terrorists. Which party has the White House has little effect on our energy policy, which is the root of the problem.

Look at it this way, there was a democrat in the White House over virtually the entire planning process for the 9/11 attacks.