Calling for a 9/11 Investigation, a letter from the Journal of 9/11 studies

The following is a letter written by the Head of the Supreme Court of Italy, Ferdinando Imposimato.

The contents of the letter call for a criminal investigation into the events of 9/11 and his case is pretty convincing. I'll break down some of the sections-

www.journalof911studies.com...

9/11 used to justify wars in Iraq and Afghanistan-

The 9/11 attacks were a global state terror operation permitted by the administration of
the USA, which had foreknowledge of the operation yet remained intentionally
unresponsive in order to make war against Afghanistan and Iraq. To put it briefly, the
9/11 events were an instance of the strategy of tension enacted by political and economic
powers in the USA to seek advantages for the oil and arms industries.

Evidence of controlled demolition-

The NIST report does not analyze the actual nature of the collapses. According to experts
at the Toronto Hearings (Sept. 8-11, 2011), the collapses had features that indicate
controlled explosions. I agree with architect Richard Gage and engineer Jon Cole, both
highly experienced professionals, who have arrived at their conclusions through reliable
tests, scientific proof, and the visual testimony of people above suspicion, including
firefighters and victims. The authoritative theologian David Ray Griffin has described
very precisely why the hypothesis of controlled demolition should be taken into
consideration. Various witnesses heard bursts of explosions.

NIST contradictions and Building 7-

According to NIST the collapse of Building 7 was due to fires provoked by the collapse
of the twin towers. Chemist and independent researcher Kevin Ryan, however, has
demonstrated that NIST gave contradictory versions of the collapse of Building 7.

In a preliminary report NIST declared that WTC7 was destroyed because of fires provoked by
diesel fuel stored in the building, while in a second report this fuel was no longer
considered the cause of the building’s collapse. Additional comments on the NIST
version of events have been made by David Chandler, another expert witness at the
Toronto Hearings.

Despite NIST’s claim of three distinct phases of collapse, Chandler
pointed out that many available videos show that for about two and a half seconds the
acceleration of the building cannot be distinguished from freefall. NIST has been obliged
to agree with this empirical fact as pointed out by Chandler, and now understandable by
everyone.

CIA withholding information regarding hijackers and foreknowledge-

Peter Dale Scott, another witness at the Hearings, demonstrated that there was a
systematic CIA pattern of withholding important information from the FBI, even when
the FBI would normally be entitled to it.

Moreover, since 1999 the CIA had investigated Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hamzi,
both Saudis who were associated with the American Airlines plane that hit the Pentagon.
The CIA had been informed that Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hamzi had arrived in
the USA in early 2000.

It is legitimate to deduce that Tenet, chief of the CIA, and
Wilshire, according to Peter Dale Scott a “key figure” in Alec Station blocked the efforts
of two FBI agents—Doug Miller and Mark Rossini—to notify the FBI center that one of
the participants in the Kuala Lumpur meeting, al-Mihdhar, got a US visa through the
United States consulate in Jeddah.

Professor Scott, basing himself on Kevin Fenton’s
research, mentions 35 different occasions when the hijackers were protected in this
fashion, from January of 2000 to September 5, 2001. With reference to the earlier of
these incidents, the motive of this protection was evidently, according to Fenton, “to
cover a CIA operation that was already in progress.”

Bin Laden visited by CIA in Dubai hospital in July 2001 and not arrested-

Further circumstantial evidence against Tenet and Wilshire is the following. On July 12,
2001 Osama bin Laden was in American Hospital in Dubai. He was visited by a CIA
agent. This information was given to Le Figaro, which also reported that bin Laden had
been operated on in this hospital, having arrived from Quetta, Pakistan.

This information was confirmed by Radio France International, which disclosed the name of the agent who
met bin Laden—Larry Mitchell. Tenet and Wilshire, aware of the presence of bin Laden
in the United Arab Emirates, failed to have him arrested and extradited, although FBI and
CIA documents held him responsible for massacres in Kenya and Tanzania.

Insider Trading in days prior to 9/11-

Insider trading is further strong evidence against the CIA, FBI and the US government.
Articles by Professor Paul Zarembka, as well as by Kevin Ryan and others, prove such
insider trading took place in the days immediately prior to the attacks. Yet this insider
trading has been denied by the FBI and the 9/11 Commission.

Intelligence servives the world over had been monitoring lead hijacker Atta

Additional evidence against the CIA and the US administration is the following. Atta, at
least since May 2000, was under CIA surveillance in Germany, according to the 9/11
Commission, both because he was accused since 1986 of attempts against Israel and
because he had been surprised while purchasing great quantities of chemical products for
use in explosives in Frankfurt (The Observer, Sept. 30, 2001).

After June 2000 the USA continued to monitor Atta,
intercepting his conversations with Sheikh Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, considered the
director of 9/11, who lived in Pakistan.

Bush told Bin Laden was going to attack just over a month before 9/11 yet didn't act

Strong evidence that the CIA was aware of Atta’s irregular movements from the USA to
Europe and within the USA is the declassified CIA document sent by the Agency to G.
W. Bush (President’s Daily Brief). This document, dated August 6, 2001, says: “Bin
Laden Determined to Strike in US.” It continues:

“Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate bin Laden since 1997 has
wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the United States. Bin Laden implied in U.S.
television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of
World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef, and ‘bring the fighting to America.’

This document proves that the CIA, FBI, as well as President Bush, knew by August 6,
2001, who had operative access: Atta. No one enjoyed such access to the US as Atta. But
the CIA, FBI and Bush did nothing to stop him.

Foreknowledge and used as pre text for war

I have collected in Italy evidence that the Iraq War was decided on by the U.S.
government before the 9/11 attacks with the help of the Italian Secret Service. According
to Michel Chossudovsky, the 9/11 attacks were used as a pretext for war, having had as
background the many years of CIA creation of, and support for, the terrorist network now
known as al Qaeda. Today there is a danger of a new “preventive war” against Iran by the
USA. This could be terrible for the people of the world and could even destroy a large
part of humanity.

Combine all these reasons for a legit investigation into 9/11 with all the other coincidences and questions, the case for a criminal investigation is very strong.

reply to post by Wonderer2012

who have arrived at their conclusions through reliable tests, scientific proof,

This is of course not true. They came to their conclusions before any "test" or "scientific proof". In fact, there are no tests or scientific proof that point to the idea there was any form of controlled demolition.

In general my response to this post is that speculation won't get you far in court, you need actual proof.

Originally posted by Wonderer2012
The following is a letter written by the Head of the Supreme Court of Italy, Ferdinando Imposimato.

(Sigh) yet another example of the damage those damned fool conspiracy web sites are causing from the paranoid swill they're spewing. From the very moment this guy repeated that debunked "Bin Laden visiting a hospital in Dubai" conspiracy meme it's obvious he's getting 100% of his information from those conspiracy con artists and he simply doesn't know better.

I agree that we need more investigations. The 9/11 attack was one of the most critical historical events in the nation's history and certainly one of the most pivital events as far as national policy, and in my view it needs to be fully documented the same way as the Pearl Harbor attack and the civil war were...but bringing in all the fake information coming from Richard "building 7 only had small fires" Gage, Alex "Pull it is lingo for controlled demolitions" Jones, Dylan "the planes had missile pods" Avery, and others, serves only to obfuscate any sincere investigation we might have. Granted, Fernando Imposimato doesn't mention the "pull it" conspiracy meme in his writings, but he refers to David Chandler as an authority on the subject and HE quotes the "pull it" conspiracy meme in his videos, so you can see right away how the phony information the conspiracy con artists are putting out propagates.

reply to post by Wonderer2012


Just wondering, what the head of a supreme court of a foreign country more special than a citizen of the united states? Many CITIZENS of the USA have requested "more investigation" why do you think anyone would bend over for some person that does not even live here? The whole more investigation thing is a subject for another thread but the thing is that people do not want more "investigation" they want answers they WANT to hear. The whole thing makes no sense, they don't want to trust a single word from the official report but at the same time they will not stop calling for more investigation until there is an official report that fits with their beliefs and world view.

Nice breakdown

S+F to you dude.

reply to post by GoodOlDave

From the very moment this guy repeated that debunked "Bin Laden visiting a hospital in Dubai" conspiracy meme it's obvious he's getting 100% of his information from those conspiracy con artists and he simply doesn't know better.

Who debunked this?

Originally posted by maxella1
Who debunked this?

Many people have looked at the claims, they came from a single source with no corroboration and no evidence.

That's generally seen as insufficient proof in other communities, but here the story has taken a life of its own and been combined with other speculation in order to build a narrative on rumour alone.

reply to post by exponent

Many people have looked at the claims, they came from a single source with no corroboration and no evidence.

Got it...

the hijackers were vaporized. bib laden is dead, as is KSM. bush has immunity. who are you going after exactly ?

there were 2 investigations, and everyone got off

nobody will move for a third, it would be political suicide to be seen as a "truther".

unless someone has DNA evidence of cheney's fingerprints on a letter to the mossad to carry out the attacks, nothing will happen

do you have something like that ?

Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by exponent

 

Many people have looked at the claims, they came from a single source with no corroboration and no evidence.

Got it...

I find it ironic you cut out the second part of my statement and then follow it up with . I take it that means you're convinced by these claims. What do you think to the idea that you're suffering from Confirmation Bias?

Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by GoodOlDave

 

Who debunked this?

When you go back through all the someone told someone who told someone who told someone else chain of propogation, we find this factoid came from a French newspaper quoting "anonymous sources" who were referencing "unreleased documents" that say Bin Laden MIGHT have been at a hospital in Dubai. This came out (I think) a year before French newspapers quoted "anonymous sources" referencing "unreleased documents" that Bin Laden died in the mountains of Pakistan from typhus. Whatever you want to accuse Bin Laden of, I think it's safe to assume he wasn't a zombie.

They were simply repeating unsubstanciated rumors that couldn't be verified to sell newspapers...but as we all know, that doesn't matter to those damned fool conspiracy web sites trying to artificially make everything as sound spooky-scary as they can. Problem is, not all the phony internet rumors are as easy to spot as Tom Flocco's "Barbara Olson is still alive and was arrested in Europe near the Italian-Polish border" stunt. How practical can any Journal of 9/11 studies investigation actually be when 90% of this investigation needs to squander it's resources sorting out all the bad information like this?