It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jeantherapy
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
Why are you incapable of doing something which is routine to almost every child I know? (use your mind to imagine a possible scenario that hasn't happened) Just try to imagine for a moment that a sporting event can occur without police presence. Here we are, 1989, Hillsborough, the match is about to start and there are no police anywhere to be seen. The fans are starting to file in to see the match. What happens next?
Originally posted by jeantherapy
What I am saying is this: If the police were not there then nobody would have died. Does somebody want to disagree with that?
Originally posted by jeantherapy
Originally posted by mirageman
Originally posted by jeantherapy
Originally posted by neformore
Folks....
Don't feed the troll.
If I were a moderator I might delete that off topic post. Care to give me your input as regards how things might have turned out if there had been ZERO police presence there that day?
The police were paid to maintain the safety of the public at a football match. It is a job many other police forces had carried out with great success, except on very rare occasions, at 100s of football grounds every week throughout Britain. They have done ever since.
The senior police officers failed that day and then tried to cover up their incompetence.
So your question is as irrelevant as asking what if there were no law enforcement agencies anywhere. Which is plain stupid. On this occasion the police failed to carry out the duties to a standard required.
My question is not irrelevant, this entire matter hinges upon the fact that police were present! I am asking you to consider the possible outcome if there were no police there. Why is everyone unwilling to consider the outcome if there had been no police? Afraid of what the answer might be?
Originally posted by budski
I wrote this thread on the 21st anniversary:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
.
Originally posted by wigit
reply to post by jeantherapy
I'm sure the private security would lie too.
Originally posted by Extralien
reply to post by AngryAlien
some of those being crushed at the fence, right in the front, were pleading with the police and others to open the barrier to let people out.. but their words fell on deaf ears as the police said they "feared there was going to be a pitch invasion"...
Originally posted by jeantherapy
"We hate the way the police manage our events but we refuse to have an event without police present" Give me a break, design your stadiums to not be deathtraps and maybe hire private security? Here, I will state it in the plainest terms possible: If there had been no police there that day it would have gone just as bad only there wouldn't have been anybody around to lie about it after the fact.
Originally posted by TheMindWar
This is a huge police scandal people. Experience tells me they will use this opportunity, this information has been released for a reason IMO.
I believe this will be used as an excuse to phase out the public servent police. They are going to demonize the police and then suggest a new Private Corporate Police. They always demonize something in the media before they bring it down. Its called pre-programming.
The government will state they cannot afford to pay the police as they are bankrupt and then the corporate police will be brought in maybe backed by the military police.edit on 12-9-2012 by TheMindWar because: Typo
Originally posted by Extralien
reply to post by AngryAlien
some of those being crushed at the fence, right in the front, were pleading with the police and others to open the barrier to let people out.. but their words fell on deaf ears as the police said they "feared there was going to be a pitch invasion"...