Teotihuacàn and Giza reveals an Ancient map?

I think it's even more of a coincidence given that the Egyptian pyramids were built 2500 years before Teotihuacan and the last person (a priest) able to read hieroglyphs died in Egypt about the time of the building of Teotihuacan.

I think you could find similar interesting coincidences in looking at public buildings and city streets.

Originally posted by Byrd
I think it's even more of a coincidence given that the Egyptian pyramids were built 2500 years before Teotihuacan and the last person (a priest) able to read hieroglyphs died in Egypt about the time of the building of Teotihuacan.

I think you could find similar interesting coincidences in looking at public buildings and city streets.

I'm sure there are similarities but the data in a contempory city would be a bit corrupted compared to these few ancients sites still remaining, wouldn't it?

Didn't know about that priest thing, sounds like somebody leaped to set forth a new world.

There is a nice evolution of basic measurements in the ancient civilizations. For instance, the Egyptian Royal Cubit is assumed to have been 52.35 cm. A little bit later on the timeline the Babylonian Cubit is estimated to be 53.0cm. These cultures interacted so it is no wonder that they are so close to each other. And then of course one has to remember that the measurements were linked to body parts, so the connection is partly due to that too.

The measurement that was used in Teotihuacàn is not known, but a very good estimate of it has been done. And the result is that one standard unit had to be 1.0594m. This measure sits well into all buildings and distances. Divide that measure with two and you get very close to the Egyptian Cubit, 52.97cm.

But this doesn't explain to me why the two Pyramids practically carry the same base.

I do not think you are crazy, you are on to something for sure. What it is exactly I don't know but the key lies in frequencies. There is talk of freqs. in most religious beliefs, Buddhism, Christianity, Hindu etc and I have been studying this for some time but cannot put my finger on it. I am thankful for your thread and have gleaned some truth from it. I believe if we all keep at it then light will be found at the end of the tunnel.

Peace to you and yours.

Keep searching my freind..you are definately on the right track.
Many years I have put into researching pyramids and the conclusions
I have found will astound you.
I do not wish to corrupt your thread with my beliefs - instead I wish to
sit at the side lines and see if you, or whomever, come to the conclusions
that I myself have found.

May I direct you to this finding;
Pacal's burial area is what would essentially be a photographic negative
of The Great Pyramid of Giza and the Great Hallway or Grand Gallery of
the Giza Pyramid is a negative of Pacal's Sun Pyramid.

Look closely...you will see it.

reply to post by AquarianTrumpet


Please feel free to corrupt the thread, or if you don't wish that you can always throw privates at me. I will look into this too. At first glance I found it very interesting that in my overlay map of Giza at Teotihuacàn, if you follow the Khafre - Sphinx line, you will end up very close to the burial site of Pacal at the Temple of Inscriptions. The line I drew at first had a heading of 106.93 degrees, if I use about 107.7 I will get right on. The overlay isn't that accurate, so it could very well be a match when done perfectly.

Thank you for this info, look forward to bury my nose in it!

reply to post by SmertSpionam1


Thank you and let us keep digging together!

Originally posted by OnWhiteMars
I'm sure there are similarities but the data in a contempory city would be a bit corrupted compared to these few ancients sites still remaining, wouldn't it?

Nope. And in fact, it might be more accurate.

Didn't know about that priest thing, sounds like somebody leaped to set forth a new world.

The last speakers and writers of hieroglyphs were priests of Isis on Philae. The priests and priestesses of Isis didn't get out much in 390 AD.
www.ancient-egypt.org...

Originally posted by AquarianTrumpet
Pacal's burial area is what would essentially be a photographic negative
of The Great Pyramid of Giza and the Great Hallway or Grand Gallery of
the Giza Pyramid is a negative of Pacal's Sun Pyramid.

Look closely...you will see it.

Only if you ignore a lot of things on the lid, including the writing around the lid which talks about him. The iconography is pretty well known and exists in other objects -- none are related to Giza or pyramids, I'm afraid.

reply to post by Byrd


I'm sure you got what I meant with 'corrupted', but I will still clarify. If we assume there are 10 ancient sites and I do get a match with half of them, or let's be more realistic and say a fifth of them, the percentage is quite high. I do realize that the odds of finding these matches in contemporary cities is much higher, but the percentage will however fall drastically? Or do you think otherwise? Just for the sake of argument

Here is an updated overlay of the two sites. There are buildings missing, but almost everything is in place.

Originally posted by thePharaoh
reply to post by OnWhiteMars

 

so you think its the orion nebula...???....does it act as a doorway of somesort??

also did you see my movie references?...dodgy innit

also you should look closer at gebel gibilli...it seems as if the ancients built in honour of this south eastern corner.

apparently it has a well, linking to helipolis, the cult centre...passing under the nile...weird, like a portal!

edit on 12-9-2012 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)

what is helipois?

reply to post by tzdub


I think there is an 'o' missing

Heliopolis

More crazy ideas by yours truly...

Okey, there is much debate over the age of the Sphinx. But I think it is safe to assume that it is older than we are officially told. A few theories link it to 10.500 BC because that was when the Leo constellation rose from the East, right under the nose of the Great Lion. Personally I think it was a Lion before Khafre had a fixation and wanted his legacy shown somewhere (and redid the Lion head).

In this era the much talked Orion's Belt has the same angle relative to the Polestar as does the Pyramids to the North-South direction. That is an angle of 45.

So let's pretend we know it was built then, and we know the purpose of the Sphinx, staring at it's brother in Heavens rising to protect us all day.

Now to the point. I rolled over the Giza formation on my overlay map. So that the Sphinx is now facing the other way.







The heading of it's stare is now about 286 degrees, give or take a few. Well, if we also assume that the Teotihuacàn complex was built 200 A.D, the Sphinx would be staring directly at where Brother Leo goes to sleep at night.

P.S.

How can I link pictures with a scroll-bar if they are too big. Now they are cut off.

Thanks for the tips in advance!

As a matter of fact this new overlay with the Sphinx heading west is quite the same as the image depicted on the bottom of the Black Pyramid Stone.




Overlay with the Sphinx heading west.

I like the idea behind this, but the pyramids match to well to the orion constellation for it to be anything else. but well done, i dont know how many things you had to smoke to come up with this one, but it was worth it. haha. had me thinking for a second.

but maybe it is the destroyer of worlds. dun dun dunnnn

seeing as your concerned with the terrestial side...you should look at "gebel ghibili" at giza...very relevant to what your looking at here

peace

reply to post by gostr


The depiction on the Black Stone Pyramid is thought to be the Orion constellation. And if you think this is over the top, check out my other threads

Originally posted by OnWhiteMars
More crazy ideas by yours truly...

Okey, there is much debate over the age of the Sphinx. But I think it is safe to assume that it is older than we are officially told. A few theories link it to 10.500 BC because that was when the Leo constellation rose from the East, right under the nose of the Great Lion. Personally I think it was a Lion before Khafre had a fixation and wanted his legacy shown somewhere (and redid the Lion head).

Howdy

You aren't officially told anything, lol. Archaeology works by consensus, the consensus agrees that the AE modified an existing natural outcropping. The body was made by leaving stone from that being removed for construction on the Giza plateau during the time the pyramid tombs were being built in the necropolis there.

A tiny minority believe the sphinx to be older, the most common date is being around 5,000 BC or later.

One thing to consider, when did the people in the Nile valley start working limestone? - When you know that you'll have a good idea of when they carved the original Sphinx's head (presuming the present head was modified later)

reply to post by Hanslune


I agree, bad word choice by me. So let us change the 'officially told' part into 'what the consensus agrees on'.

The Sphinx head is everything but the right size in relations with the body, so I presume it has to be carved later on.