It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The “great hegemonic American economy” is on the verge of total collapse, because the only way it can pay for the imports that sustain it is by issuing more debt and printing more money. Once the debt and money creation undermine the dollar as world reserve currency, the US will become overnight a third world country, much to the relief of the rest of the world.
Friday’s payroll jobs report says that 96,000 new jobs were created in August and that the unemployment rate (U.3) fell from 8.3% to 8.1%. As 96,000 new jobs are not enough to keep up with population growth, the decline in the U.3 unemployment rate was caused by 368,000 discouraged job seekers giving up on finding employment and dropping out of the work force as measured by U.3. Discouraged workers are not included in the U.3 measure of unemployment, which makes the measure useless. The only purpose of U.3 is to keep bad news out of the news. the U.3 unemployment rate only measures those who have not been discouraged by the inability to find a job and are still actively seeking employment.
The government produces another unemployment measure, U.6, which includes people who have been discouraged by the inability to find a job and have been out of the work force for less than a year. This measure of unemployment is 14.7%, a number that would get attention if reported.
When the long-term (more than one year) discouraged workers are included, the US unemployment rate is about 22%. In other words, the real US rate of unemployment is almost three times higher than the reported–headline rate–of 8.1%.
Originally posted by zero1020
Do you know what would fix this entire debt crisis? If the major players around the world agreed to forgive all debts and start the cycle again. Sure millions would lose their so called "valuables" but at least the world won't rip itself apart. After the shock is over people will be able to lend and borrow again to create businesses.
I've always wondered why we carry the debt of previous generations on our shoulders.
I would rather be stuck in another cycle and have time to find a sound economic system than have violent revolutions that would kill millions. I don't think we have enough time and enough people willing to commit to such a change.
Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
Originally posted by zero1020
Do you know what would fix this entire debt crisis? If the major players around the world agreed to forgive all debts and start the cycle again. Sure millions would lose their so called "valuables" but at least the world won't rip itself apart. After the shock is over people will be able to lend and borrow again to create businesses.
I've always wondered why we carry the debt of previous generations on our shoulders.
The cycle is inherently flawed; we need a new economic system as well as a new monetary system.
We carry the debt of previous generations because somebody has to pay it back. Also, the last 30 years or so speak to why we're in so much debt. The generation responsible for this mess is still alive.
U-1, persons unemployed 15 weeks or longer, as a percent of the civilian labor force;
U-2, job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs, as a percent of the civilian labor force;
U-3, total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (this is the definition used for the official unemployment rate);
U-4, total unemployed plus discouraged workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus discouraged workers;
U-5, total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other marginally attached workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers; and
U-6, total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
It is mathematically impossible to pay off the US national debt. Cutting programs does nothing to improve the situation, either way it will collapse eventually.
Because that would only eliminate about 1/3 of our deficit and the debt would keep growing.
Instead of cutting off the aid to the millions of Americans who need it, why don't we cut the defense budget by 60% ?
Originally posted by Common Good
Maybe that is their entire plan....
Crash the Economy in order to revive it?
Maybe they are trying to "accidentally" bankrupt this nation in order to institute a new form of entitlement?
Maybe they think if we officially go bankrupt, then we can just "start over".
They sure do spend like they are out of control.
If some say it is mathmatically impossible to pay it back.. than that must mean IMO they are trying to avoid being held responsible for that debt, and are now trying to bankrupt itself on that debt. I owe you nothing now. ..Could THAT be possible?
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by muse7
Because that would only eliminate about 1/3 of our deficit and the debt would keep growing.
Instead of cutting off the aid to the millions of Americans who need it, why don't we cut the defense budget by 60% ?
You've got the right idea, but you're not going nearly far enough. (And no, I don't mean cutting 100% of the defense budget, we'd still have about half of our annual deficit.)
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by penninja
I'm curious where your figures are coming from. The link in my signature shows where mine come from...and I see 3.7 Trillion as the 2012 Budget. 1.3 Trillion of which is a budget deficit and just over 700 Billion is Defense spending which DOES include "Overseas Contingency Funding" (yeah, the really call it that in the budget..lol). So if we outright redlined the military today and brought the whole thing to 0 funding. We'd still be running an annual deficit today of roughly 600 billion dollars. That's per year.
Of that which would remain, we still have a 1/4 trillion per year right now in just interest paid on the national debt. That is regardless of what debt or who holds it. The Gross interest due is almost twice that. This figure is after all the rest is taken off and accounted for. By 2017, that is over HALF a trillion in net payments due on interest to the national debt. You really don't want to know what 2022 looked like by the White House's own rosy projections.
Realspoke and I don't agree on much, but on this we agree entirely. The two solutions I see to the national debt are, as others noted and I admit myself, as bad or worse than the collapse this debt is going to bring. It breaks 20 TRILLION dollars by 2017...and that's really if unemployment falls below 6%, GDP growth doubles and a range of other assumptions the White House made in coming up with that figure all hold true.
We're in a world of serious hurt and that's no fear talk. It's straight talk...and straight from their own budget book.