It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jude11
If he killed a bug to eat it, would it be the same crime?
Originally posted by TrueBlood
This is a problem because the state would rather this man sit on the street and die of hunger than help him or, in this case, let him eat an animal that it considers more valuable than human life.
Originally posted by TrueBlood
You and I were born into a system of control. You play by the rules or the state puts you in a cage. If you end up homeless you do not build shelter and you do not hunt food. You die on the street like a good animal or be put in a cage.
Originally posted by masqua
One thing for sure, he won't be hungry for the next two months.
Glass half full.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by masqua
One thing for sure, he won't be hungry for the next two months.
Glass half full.
I thought the same thing. Man gets Hungry. Man kills bird to eat. Man learns Bird has more rights! Man sentenced to 60 days with free meals 3x's a day. Man learns lesson. Kill bird to be arrested, not to eat.
Now he'll know what to do when he's hungry in the future. Do something to offend a tourist badly enough and it's free meals and hot sheets for a month or two. Makes perfect sense.
Originally posted by masqua
One thing for sure, he won't be hungry for the next two months.
Glass half full.
Originally posted by Firefly_
Murder is murder