It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chrysalis
If interstellar travel is impossible ...
... how come they're HERE ???§!!
Originally posted by gortex
Interstellar travel is impossible for us because we are a primitive type 0 civilization with a limited knowledge of physics, who know what is possible for a type 1,2 or 3 civilization with an a advanced knowledge of physics and the ability to harnesses the energy output of a Star or even Galaxy.
Originally posted by Imtor
QUIT PROTECTING the whole scientific community. There ARE completely close-minded asses that yes, think things revlolve around discovered science.
Originally posted by Imtor
Just because you put a badge or get A+ in some PhD or whatever doesn't make you godly knowledgable and credible
Originally posted by Imtor
Yes, there are those who think it is impossible for aliens to reach us here...
Originally posted by Imtor
WHY? How do you know how they travel, just because movies haven't presented a theory of such travel yet?
Originally posted by Imtor
This is where traditional/main-stream science is wrong (it's called so for a reason, it is based on what it accepts and what not)
Originally posted by ImtorNO WAY aliens could travel such distances is unscientific and absolutely wrong since you don't know what methods they could use.
Originally posted by Imtor
See, the OP is right - there is some common bias about space travel here.
In other words, it's relatively easy for imaginary aliens to travel between the stars with their fancy space ships powered by pixie dust.
Originally posted by Chrysalis
If interstellar travel is impossible ...
... how come they're HERE ???§!!
Originally posted by Druscilla
The problem I have relates not to the life span of any potential visitor, but the sheer vast enormous magnitude of the universe and the time scales involved.
For instance, if you could count one star each second in the Milky Way, it would take you over 10,000 years to count all the stars in just our galaxy.
Spread that out over Hundreds of BILLIONS of Galaxies, and it would take several orders of magnitude longer than the age of the universe itself to explore even a small portion of the total universe, even if you could visit/count one star a second.
A Von Neumann probe is a robot designed to reach distant star systems and create factories which will reproduce copies themselves by the thousands. A dead moon rather than a planet makes the ideal destination for Von Neumann probes, since they can easily land and take off from these moons, and also because these moons have no erosion. These probes would live off the land, using naturally occurring deposits of iron, nickel, etc. to create the raw ingredients to build a robot factory. They would create thousands of copies of themselves, which would then scatter and search for other star systems.
Similar to a virus colonizing a body many times its size, eventually there would be a sphere of trillions of Von Neumann probes expanding in all directions, increasing at a fraction of the speed of light. In this fashion, even a galaxy 100,000 light years across may be completely analyzed within, say, a half million years.
If a Von Neumann probe only finds evidence of primitive life (such as an unstable, savage Type 0 civilization) they might simply lie dormant on the moon, silently waiting for the Type 0 civilization to evolve into a stable Type I civilization. After waiting quietly for several millennia, they may be activated when the emerging Type I civilization is advanced enough to set up a lunar colony. Physicist Paul Davies of the University of Adelaide has even raised the possibility of a Von Neumann probe resting on our own moon, left over from a previous visitation in our system aeons ago.
Originally posted by Diablos
So, assuming ... it is not unreasonable to assume ...
Originally posted by Druscilla
I think therein lies the problem.
Assuming on assumptions isn't exactly sound logic.
Originally posted by thedoctorswife
Originally posted by OpenEars123
Good point!
What gets me is that people will say it is impossible going by 'our' laws of physics. What makes our physics so perfect and final? We are an under evolved race, therefore our laws of physics are under evolved. Just my 2 pence.
Same here, i tend to think, why are our laws of physics considered definitive?
Originally posted by Diablos
Originally posted by Druscilla
I think therein lies the problem.
Assuming on assumptions isn't exactly sound logic.
That's because there isn't any definitive evidence that UFO's are of extraterrestrial origin. But, if an advanced civilization wanted to explore the galaxy in the most economically feasible manner, probes are clearly the way to go rather than manual exploration. Seeing as an advanced civilization will have understood the science behind molecular manufacturing, they will have sent out self-replicating probes throughout the universe at some point in time, much like we will in the near future once we have a better understanding of nanotechnology.