It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Annee
LeSigh: Married, non-married, gay, straight- none of these things should be tied to marital status. Give everyone these rights and I wonder how many people would care about the marriage/civil union issue at all?
Which is why these things shouldn't be tied to marriage, full stop. Your legal marriage/government contract should not have these things attached to it. Everyone should have those privileges regardless of marital status or sexual orientation. That's true equality. Do you get it now?
Annee: Opinion does not change the fact these things are privileges afforded only through LEGAL marriage. And denied to LGBT - - - even those legally married in their state.
LeSigh: Personally, I know I wouldn't care if the government decided not to recognize my marriage.
And? I sure do take advantage- but I don't recognize the government as having the power to tell me if I'm really married or not in the first place. If they revoke my associated privileges I'd be upset- but ultimately- I'd get over it and be more about making sure these privileges were afforded to everyone REGARDLESS of marital status- like it should be.
Annee: People keep saying this - - and I'd bet 99% of them are Legally married and taking advantage of the privileges it affords them.
LeSigh: It's the religious aspect that matters to me.
Annee: But I don't care. It's your religion - - not mine.
I am as much a part of this country as any religious person. Legal marriage is a government contract - - and has nothing to do with religion.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
The original point of the marriage license was to prohibit interracial marriage. Right now, the legal benefits of marriage may be to give an incentive to raise families, not necessarily to procreate. Gay people can procreate, using invitro fertilization and surrogates. They can adopt too. There's nothing stopping a gay couple from raising a family. Many gay couples are already raising families, right now, as we speak. And, there are plenty of heterosexual couples who have decided not to raise a family at all. No one is prohibiting them from getting a marriage license.edit on 7-9-2012 by kaylaluv because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by charles1952
I've never done this before, but it's important to me. I learn by puting out an idea and by having others add to it, correct it, or just destroy it. I'm asking a big favor here. Would you be kind enough to go back to my post here: www.abovetopsecret.com... and let me know where I'm going wrong?
With respect,
Charles1952
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by Kali74
The whole idea of needing the governments stamp of approval and then you PAYING for a license to do what you feel is natural is ridiculous in itself!
Why does anyone need the approval of the government to live with whom they love for the rest of their life?
It's all about control and MONEY!!!!
Originally posted by charles1952
I've never done this before, but it's important to me. I learn by puting out an idea and by having others add to it, correct it, or just destroy it. I'm asking a big favor here. Would you be kind enough to go back to my post here: www.abovetopsecret.com... and let me know where I'm going wrong?
With respect,
Charles1952
Originally posted by LeSigh
Which is why these things shouldn't be tied to marriage, full stop. Your legal marriage/government contract should not have these things attached to it. Everyone should have those privileges regardless of marital status or sexual orientation. That's true equality. Do you get it now?
If the government revokes marriage for everyone today- I'm still married according to my religion.
Originally posted by david99118
Originally posted by kaylaluv
The original point of the marriage license was to prohibit interracial marriage. Right now, the legal benefits of marriage may be to give an incentive to raise families, not necessarily to procreate. Gay people can procreate, using invitro fertilization and surrogates. They can adopt too. There's nothing stopping a gay couple from raising a family. Many gay couples are already raising families, right now, as we speak. And, there are plenty of heterosexual couples who have decided not to raise a family at all. No one is prohibiting them from getting a marriage license.edit on 7-9-2012 by kaylaluv because: (no reason given)
no, current laws are for promoting procreation, not families. if the government actually cared about creating families it would be more heavily regulated or at least education on how a good family should operate. all they care about are more taxpayers, worker drones, and soldier drones. as long as its behind closed doors they couldn't care less that daddy is "playing" with little sister every night he gets drunk or that mommy isent really hurting johnny with that leather belt. th government needs bodies, not happy families. its like the paint job on your car. weather its blue or brown, it really makes no difference. weather a happy family is made or not is irrelevant.
as for gays being able to raise children i am not sure why you brought that up. any idiot knows that proper way for a child to be raised is by a mother and father. but it is also obviously clear its better to have a loving gay couple raising a child than an abusive straight couple. context context context.
Originally posted by david99118
if the government actually cared about creating families it would be more heavily regulated or at least education on how a good family should operate.
Originally posted by Labrynth2012
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by Kali74
The whole idea of needing the governments stamp of approval and then you PAYING for a license to do what you feel is natural is ridiculous in itself!
Why does anyone need the approval of the government to live with whom they love for the rest of their life?
It's all about control and MONEY!!!!
Yes it is, you've hit the NAIL on the HEAD ! It's all about CONTROL and MONEY. People are CHATTEL to the Government. As long as you have an SSN number, they can CONTROL many aspects of your life.
However, if G/L couples want the same emoluments and privileges conferred to heterosexual couples upon marriage, then they are going to have to lobby the US Congress for them. Not the President of the US, because the President can only ENFORCE the LAW, not make it. That unfortunately, falls into the hands of the US Congress.
Good Luck with that !
Originally posted by LeSigh
reply to post by Annee
Actually, my view has just as much bearing as yours as to relevance.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by david99118
Originally posted by kaylaluv
The original point of the marriage license was to prohibit interracial marriage. Right now, the legal benefits of marriage may be to give an incentive to raise families, not necessarily to procreate. Gay people can procreate, using invitro fertilization and surrogates. They can adopt too. There's nothing stopping a gay couple from raising a family. Many gay couples are already raising families, right now, as we speak. And, there are plenty of heterosexual couples who have decided not to raise a family at all. No one is prohibiting them from getting a marriage license.edit on 7-9-2012 by kaylaluv because: (no reason given)
no, current laws are for promoting procreation, not families. if the government actually cared about creating families it would be more heavily regulated or at least education on how a good family should operate. all they care about are more taxpayers, worker drones, and soldier drones. as long as its behind closed doors they couldn't care less that daddy is "playing" with little sister every night he gets drunk or that mommy isent really hurting johnny with that leather belt. th government needs bodies, not happy families. its like the paint job on your car. weather its blue or brown, it really makes no difference. weather a happy family is made or not is irrelevant.
as for gays being able to raise children i am not sure why you brought that up. any idiot knows that proper way for a child to be raised is by a mother and father. but it is also obviously clear its better to have a loving gay couple raising a child than an abusive straight couple. context context context.
Using your (rather silly) argument, the government doesn't care how you procreate, as long as you procreate. Gays can procreate using IVF and surrogates, so they're covered.
The rest of your post is idiotic - and that's me being nice.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by LeSigh
reply to post by Annee
Actually, my view has just as much bearing as yours as to relevance.
If its religious based and does not involve EQUAL marriage - - - no it doesn't.
What part of RIGHT NOW do you not comprehend?
We are dealing with what exists RIGHT NOW. Not - - opinion on how it should be changed for the future.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by whyamIhere
Oh, this old "Chestnut"...
After seven pages of intelligent arguing.
We are no further along.
This is planting season, and the seeds have been sown.
Soon will come the harvest, and we will reap our rewards as a result of our efforts.
It takes time for these little seeds of truth to sprout into trees of liberty.
Patience is a virtue, after all.
We must resist the urge to give into our impetuous nature.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by david99118
if the government actually cared about creating families it would be more heavily regulated or at least education on how a good family should operate.
I'll buy that. Regulated parental units.
Hmmm - - - let's see. Gays have had to fight for this right. It is something that means more to them then those that can just pop out a kid any time.
I vote for more Gay parents.
Originally posted by david99118
well you're certainly free to believe whatever incompetent BS you like. and as always, i was never making an argument. it was a statement. i know iam right and you're wrong. no discussion, debate or argument. just sating facts.
i get so tired of being surrounded by idiots no matter where i go.