Muslim group, Ansar al-Sunna, demand breakaway Islamic nation in Norway or another 9/11 threatened

Originally posted by ollncasino

Originally posted by mekhanics
Sadly, your argument is invalid.

The chapter is called "The Repentance"

Surah 9

Nice try though, dough

Dough? Are you making some bread?

Ironically your own link contains the verse

[Quran 9:5]

“ But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

Sadly for non-Muslims, repentance consists of submitting to Islamic domination. Which is great if you are a Muslim.

In other words, nice try at trying to spin Islamic aggression as something benign.

Again, fallacy out of context.

Cheez, you must be a great spin doctor


Tell me, why do you preach jihad?

"All who would not seek the LORD, the God of Israel, were to be put to death, whether small or great, man or woman. (From the NIV Bible, 2 Chronicles 15:13)"

Originally posted by mekhanics
Dude , tell me - Did Jesus preach Jihad?

Not to the best of my knowledge, however Muhammad did.

In a single decade Muhammad

• Fought 8 major battles
• Led 18 raids
• Planned another 38 military operations where others were in command but operating under his orders and strategic direction.

HistoryNet

Major battles were exactly that.

• At Kheibar in 628 C.E., the Muslim army was 2,000 combatants.
• When Muhammad mounted his assault on Mecca (630 C.E.) he did so with 10,000 men.
• And at the Battle of Hunayn a few months later the army numbered 12,000.

Source: Islamic Imperialism: A History by Karsh, E. (2007)

Are Muslims aware that Muhammad was a military leader who spread Islam by the sword?

The Koran and the Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith (canonical to Sunnis who make up about 85% of all Muslims worldwide) make it abundantly clear that Muhammad was a military general who spread Islam by the sword.

Many Muslims prefer to underplay this aspect of Muhammad. Sadly, jihadists do not.

reply to post by ollncasino


Great men spoke about muhammad, they knew true history about him unlike you try to belittle islam, i smell what the dog is cooking

Napolean Bonaparte as Quoted in Christian Cherfils, ‘Bonaparte et Islam,’ Pedone Ed., Paris, France, 1914, pp. 105, 125.
Original References: "Correspondance de Napoléon Ier Tome V pièce n° 4287 du 17/07/1799..."

"Moses has revealed the existence of God to his nation. Jesus Christ to the Roman world, Muhammad to the old continent...

"Arabia was idolatrous when, six centuries after Jesus, Muhammad introduced the worship of the God of Abraham, of Ishmael, of Moses, and Jesus. The Ariyans and some other sects had disturbed the tranquility of the east by agitating the question of the nature of the Father, the son, and the Holy Ghost. Muhammad declared that there was none but one God who had no father, no son and that the trinity imported the idea of idolatry...

"I hope the time is not far off when I shall be able to unite all the wise and educated men of all the countries and establish a uniform regime based on the principles of Qur'an which alone are true and which alone can lead men to happiness."

Sir George Bernard Shaw in 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.

"If any religion had the chance of ruling over England, nay Europe within the next hundred years, it could be Islam."

"I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity."

"I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today."

Bertrand Russel in ‘History of Western Philosophy,’ London, 1948, p. 419.

"Our use of phrase 'The Dark ages' to cover the period from 699 to 1,000 marks our undue concentration on Western Europe...

"From India to Spain, the brilliant civilization of Islam flourished. What was lost to christendom at this time was not lost to civilization, but quite the contrary...

"To us it seems that West-European civilization is civilization, but this is a narrow view."

H.G. Wells

"The Islamic teachings have left great traditions for equitable and gentle dealings and behavior, and inspire people with nobility and tolerance. These are human teachings of the highest order and at the same time practicable. These teachings brought into existence a society in which hard-heartedness and collective oppression and injustice were the least as compared with all other societies preceding it....Islam is replete with gentleness, courtesy, and fraternity."

Dr. William Draper in 'History of Intellectual Development of Europe'

"During the period of the Caliphs the learned men of the Christians and the Jews were not only held in great esteem but were appointed to posts of great responsibility, and were promoted to the high ranking job in the government....He (Caliph Haroon Rasheed) never considered to which country a learned person belonged nor his faith and belief, but only his excellence in the field of learning."

Thomas Carlyle in ‘Heroes, Hero Worship, and the Heroic in History,’ Lecture 2, Friday, 8th May 1840.

"As there is no danger of our becoming, any of us, Mahometans (i.e. Muslim), I mean to say all the good of him I justly can...

"When Pococke inquired of Grotius, where the proof was of that story of the pigeon, trained to pick peas from Mahomet's (Muhammad's) ear, and pass for an angel dictating to him? Grotius answered that there was no proof!...

"A poor, hard-toiling, ill-provided man; careless of what vulgar men toil for. Not a bad man, I should say; Something better in him than hunger of any sort, -- or these wild arab men, fighting and jostling three-and-twenty years at his hand, in close contact with him always, would not revered him so! They were wild men bursting ever and anon into quarrel, into all kinds of fierce sincerity; without right worth and manhood, no man could have commanded them. They called him prophet you say? Why he stood there face to face with them; bare, not enshrined in any mystry; visibly clouting his own cloak, cobbling his own shoes; fighting, counselling, ordering in the midst of them: they must have seen what kind of man he was, let him be called what you like! No emperor with his tiaras was obeyed as this man in a cloak of his own clouting. During three-and-twenty years of rough actual trial. I find something of a veritable Hero necessary for that, of itself...

"These Arabs, the man Mahomet, and that one century, - is it not as if a spark had fallen, one spark, on a world of what proves explosive powder, blazes heaven-high from Delhi to Granada! I said, the Great man was always as lightning out of Heaven; the rest of men waited for him like fuel, and then they too would flame..."

Phillip Hitti in 'Short History of the Arabs.'

"During all the first part of the Middle Ages, no other people made as important a contribution to human progress as did the Arabs, if we take this term to mean all those whose mother-tongue was Arabic, and not merely those living in the Arabian peninsula. For centuries, Arabic was the language of learning, culture and intellectual progress for the whole of the civilized world with the exception of the Far East. From the IXth to the XIIth century there were more philosophical, medical, historical, religiuos, astronomical and geographical works written in Arabic than in any other human tongue."

Carra de Vaux in 'The Philosophers of Islam,' Paris, 1921.

"Finally how can one forget that at the same time the Mogul Empire of India (1526-1857 C.E.) was giving the world the Taj Mahal (completed in 1648 C.E.) the architectural beauty of which has never been surpassed, and the ‘Akbar Nameh’ of Abul Fazl: "That extraordinary work full of life ideas and learning where every aspect of life is examined listed and classified, and where progress continually dazzles the eye, is a document of which Oriental civilization may justly be proud. The men whose genius finds its expression in this book were far in advance of their age in the practical art of government, and they were perhaps in advance of it in their speculations about religious philosophy. Those poets those philosophers knew how to deal with the world or matter. They observe, classify, calculate and experiment. All the ideas that occur to them are tested against facts. They express them with eloquence but they also support them with statistics."...the principles of tolerance, justice and humanity which prevailed during the long reign of Akbar."

Marcel Clerget in 'La Turquie, Passe et Present,' Paris, 1938.

"Many proofs of high cultural level of the Ottoman Empire during the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent are to be found in the development of science and law; in the flowering of literary works in Arabic, Persian and Turkish; in the contemporary monuments in Istanbul, Bursa, and Edirne; in the boom in luxury industries; in the sumptuous life of the court and high dignitaries, and last but not least in its religious tolerance. All the various influences - notably Turkish, Byzantine and Italian mingle together and help to make this the most brilliant epoch of the Ottomans."

Michael the Elder (Great) as Quoted in 'Michael the Elder, Chronique de Michael Syrien, Patriarche Jacobite d’ Antioche,' J.B. Chabot, Editor, Vol. II, Paris, 1901.

"This is why the God of vengeance, who alone is all-powerful, and changes the empire of mortals as He will, giving it to whomsoever He will, and uplifting the humble beholding the wickedness of the Romans who throughout their dominions, cruelly plundered our churches and our monasteries and condemned us without pity, brought from the region of the south the sons of Ishmael, to deliver us through them from the hands of the Romans. And if in truth we have suffered some loss, because the Catholic churches, that had been taken away from us and given to the Chalcedonians, remained in their possession; for when the cities submitted to the Arabs, they assigned to each denomination the churches which they found it to be in possession of (and at that time the great churches of Emessa and that of Harran had been taken away from us); nevertheless it was no slight advantage for us to be delivered from the cruelty of the Romans, their wickedness, their wrath and cruel zeal against us, and to find ourselves at people. (Michael the Elder, Jacobite Patriarch of Antioch wrote this text in the latter part of the twelfth century, after five centuries of Muslim rule in that region. Click here for a relevant document sent to the monks of St. Catherine Monastery in Mt. Sinai, 628 C.E.)

Sir John Bagot Glubb

“Khalif (Caliph) Al-Ma'mun's period of rule (813 - 833 C.E.) may be considered the 'golden age' of science and learning. He had always been devoted to books and to learned pursuits. His brilliant mind was interested in every form of intellectual activity. Not only poetry but also philosophy, theology, astronomy, medicine and law all occupied his time.”

“By Mamun's time medical schools were extremely active in Baghdad. The first free public hospital was opened in Baghdad during the Caliphate of Haroon-ar-Rashid. As the system developed, physicians and surgeons were appointed who gave lectures to medical students and issued diplomas to those who were considered qualified to practice. The first hospital in Egypt was opened in 872 AD and thereafter public hospitals sprang up all over the empire from Spain and the Maghrib to Persia.”

On the Holocaust of Baghdad (1258 C.E.) Perpetrated by Hulagu:

“The city was systematically looted, destroyed and burnt. Eight hundred thousand persons are said to have been killed. The Khalif Mustasim was sewn up in a sack and trampled to death under the feet of Mongol horses.

“For five hundred years, Baghdad had been a city of palaces, mosques, libraries and colleges. Its universities and hospitals were the most up-to-date in the world. Nothing now remained but heaps of rubble and a stench of decaying human flesh.”

www.cyberistan.org...

Originally posted by mekhanics
Great men spoke about muhammad, they knew true history about him unlike you try to belittle islam, i smell what the dog is cooking

Are you aware that Muhammad burnt people to death for not praying?

Bukhari (11:626)

- "The Prophet said, 'No prayer is harder for the hypocrites than the Fajr and the 'Isha' prayers and if they knew the reward for these prayers at their respective times, they would certainly present themselves (in the mosques) even if they had to crawl.' The Prophet added, 'Certainly I decided to order the Mu'adh-dhin (call-maker) to pronounce Iqama and order a man to lead the prayer and then take a fire flame to burn all those who had not left their houses so far for the prayer along with their houses.'"

Muhammad orders his men to burn alive those who do not present themselves at the mosque for prayer.

www.quranexplorer.com...

Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī (Arabic: صحيح البخاري‎), is one of the six canonical hadith collections (Al-Kutub Al-Sittah) of Sunni Islam.

Sunni Muslims view this as one of the three most trusted collections of hadith along with Sahih Muslim and al-Muwatta In some circles, it is considered the most authentic book after the Qur'an. The Arabic word sahih translates as authentic or correct
Sahih al-Bukhari


Just you keep defending the founder of your religion - a man that spread Islam by the sword and burnt people for not praying.

reply to post by mekhanics


According to the Koran and Hadith, Muhammad

• Pronounced death for leaving Islam, Hadith Sahih Bukhari, Book 83

• Told followers that Jihad was the second highest thing after believing in Allah, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, number 25

• Stated he would fight until everyone admitted their was only one god, Allah, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, number 24

• Burnt people for not praying Sahih Bukhari Book 1, Vol 11, Verse 626

• Forced non Muslims to be humbled, submit to Islam and pay jizyah tax.Koran Book 9 Verse 29

If Muhammad, according to the Koran and Hadith, pronounced death for leaving Islam, told his followers to spread Islam by the sword, did so himself, praised violent jihad, burnt people for not praying and forced non-Muslims to be humbled and pay jizyah tax, in what sense is Islam a religion of peace?

reply to post by ollncasino



"Sigh"

My response.....


IS ISLAM SPREAD BY THE SWORD?





Ask Him too :

'It really makes me think about becoming a Muslim'

The actor was criticised in 2010 after claiming The Chronicles Of Narnia lion, Aslan, who he provided the voice for in the film, was not based on Christ as CS Lewis had claimed but in fact all spiritual leaders including Mohammed.

Return to your land of origin and there will be no problem.

Originally posted by ollncasino
reply to post by mekhanics

 

According to the Koran and Hadith, Muhammad

• Pronounced death for leaving Islam, Hadith Sahih Bukhari, Book 83

• Told followers that Jihad was the second highest thing after believing in Allah, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, number 25

• Stated he would fight until everyone admitted their was only one god, Allah, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, number 24

• Burnt people for not praying Sahih Bukhari Book 1, Vol 11, Verse 626

• Forced non Muslims to be humbled, submit to Islam and pay jizyah tax.Koran Book 9 Verse 29

If Muhammad, according to the Koran and Hadith, pronounced death for leaving Islam, told his followers to spread Islam by the sword, did so himself, praised violent jihad, burnt people for not praying and forced non-Muslims to be humbled and pay jizyah tax, in what sense is Islam a religion of peace?

You are blinded , nay you are unlearned, actually you are deliberately playing with verses from the quran and hadith to suite with your argument AGAIN.

One of the most common clichés about Islam is that it “spread by the sword”. After all – the reasoning goes – why would so many people have converted if not under threat of death? It is not difficult to speculate why European Christians would have favored this explanation: many of the early converts to Islam were Christians, and they must have been uncomfortable with so many of their brethren converting. However, some Muslims today also have adopted the idea that their ancestors became Muslim by force, not by choice.

www.iqraonline.net...

Originally posted by mekhanics
Ask Him too :

'It really makes me think about becoming a Muslim'

A Movie star thinks about becoming a Muslim. We should all rush down to our nearest mosque then?

What would happen to him if he later wanted to leave Islam?

Iran: Pastor to Hang for Apostasy in Iran

Pakistan: Death penalty for apostates passes unopposed in Pakistan

Saudi Arabia : Saudi Hamza Kashgari faces death calls after prophet tweets

If Muslims hang people for leaving Islam, in what sense is Islam a religion of peace?

reply to post by ollncasino



Tell me - Is there a jihad in Christianity?

Yes indeed, there is a jihad (exertion or striving) in Christianity. Jihad in Christianity is tied to the faith 100%. There is no mention in the New Testament of this “striving” (jihad) being tied to anything except the spiritual life, for the term jihad in Christianity means striving against sin.

Jesus taught about jihad.

He told his disciples “Strive to enter in at the narrow gate…”
In Luke 13:24. He wanted them to put their sight towards the faith in him and in his life as an example.
The Christian gate is narrow because it requires faith in Jesus and what he did to save us.

Jesus’ actions speak as well.

When the Roman soldiers arrested Jesus and led him to the Roman governor, he asked Jesus, “Am I a Jew? It was your people and your chief priests who handed you over to me. What is it you have done?” Jesus said “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place” John 18:35-36.
Never did Jesus ask his followers to fight for him or for their beliefs; instead he commanded them to love their enemies. Jihad in Jesus teaching is a spiritual jihad only.

Jesus’ disciples taught about jihad as well.

Paul in 1 Timothy 6:12 said, “Fight the good fight of the faith”; and in 2 Timothy 4:7, “I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith.” Paul never raised a sword against anyone!
2 Peter 3:14—“ So then, dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with him.”

2 Peter 1:5-7—“For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness, love.”

www.arabicnoor.com...

Next time they start burning another nations flag in public the people should simply shower them with bacon bits. There are plenty of places friendly to idiots like that all over the middle east, there is no need to export that nonsense.

Originally posted by mekhanics
reply to post by ollncasino

 

"Sigh"

My response.....


IS ISLAM SPREAD BY THE SWORD?

HIstory shows us that it did. Mohammed actually led armies into combat. This is a historical fact. Of course Islam was spread by the sword.

Originally posted by mekhanics
One of the most common clichés about Islam is that it “spread by the sword”.

I am happy that you reject Islam's violent past.

Muhammad himself however was an enthusiastic jihadist.

570 - Born in Mecca

610 - 1st visions at 40

622 - 634 - 1st 18 months after migration to Medina - 7 Muslim raids on caravans.

624 - Muslim ambush of caravan at Nakhla - 8 to 10 Muslims - killed 1 and captured 2 caravan attendants.

Raid occurred during holy month of Rajab. Bloodshed forbidden according to pagan beliefs. Wave of indignation in Medina. New Quranic revelation to justify the attack during holy month.

624 - Battle of Badr

624 Muhammad lays siege to the Qainuqa Jewish tribe in Medina. Expels the tribe (including 700 fighting men) and divides their property amongst his followers.

625 - Battle of Mount Uhud. Muslim defeat. Over 70 Muslims killed.

625 - Muhammad lays siege to Nadir Jewish tribe in Medina. Driven out of Medina and divides their property amongst his followers.

626 - Muhammad sends small force to fight hostile tribes in area of Dumat al- Jandal, 500 miles North East of Medina.

627 - Muhammad lays siege to Quraaiza Jewish tribe in Medina. 600 to 800 males beheaded on Muhammad's orders. Women and children enslaved.

627 - Further raids and a number of political assassinations. Muhammad absolved Muslim assassins of any wrong.

628 - Meccans and Muhammad negotiate a 10 year truce. Muslims forced to stop raiding caravans in return for right to make a yearly, 3 day pilgrimage to Mecca.

628 Muhammad lays siege to Jewish tribe in Khaibar with an army of 2,000.

Jews surrendered after a month. Jews stripped of possessions and ordered to leave.

Number of other Jewish communities surrendered on similar terms.

629 Muhammad renounces the 10 year truce with Mecca.

630 Muhammad sets off to besiege Mecca with a force of 10,000 men. Mecca surrenders with little resistance.

630 Battle of Hunayn - Muslim army of 12,000 men against Bedouin tribe of Hawazin. Muslim victory.

630 Muhammad advances to Byzantine (Eastern Roman Empire) frontier with an army of 30,000, 500 miles North of Medina.

631 Tribal dignitaries from all over Arabian peninsula flock to Mecca to profess subservience and pay tribute.

631/632 Preparation for campaign in Transjordan and Southern Palestine.

632 Muhammad dies.


If Muhammad was an enthusiastic jihadists and spread Islam by the sword, in what sense is Islam a religion of peace?

reply to post by ollncasino


Remember what jesus said :

"I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword"(Gospel of Matthew 10:34)


Jihad Galore

Originally posted by InfaRedMan

"We do not wish to live together with dirty beasts like you..."

The Norwegian news portal VG Nett is reporting that a Muslim terrorist group, Ansar al-Sunna’, is threatening that if a section of the nation's capitol isn't transformed into a sharia-complaint Muslim nation, an attack rivaling 9/11 will be launched upon the Scandinavian nation.

What is the solution?

Deport them. Simple. Clean. Quick.

If they come back, wood chipper.

reply to post by ollncasino



Muhammad is NO.1 Sadly jesus on 3rd place. Too bad


The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History

The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History is a 1978 book by Michael H. Hart, reprinted in 1992 with revisions. It is a ranking of the 100 people who, according to Hart, most influenced human history.[1]

The first person on Hart's list is the Prophet of Islam Muhammad.[2] Hart asserted that Muhammad was "supremely successful" in both the religious and secular realms. He also believed that Muhammad's role in the development of Islam was far more influential than Jesus' collaboration in the development of Christianity. He attributes the development of Christianity to St. Paul, who played a pivotal role in its dissemination.

The 1992 revisions included the demotion of figures associated with Communism, such as Vladimir Lenin and Mao Zedong, and the introduction of Mikhail Gorbachev. Hart took sides in the Shakespearean authorship issue and substituted Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford for William Shakespeare. Hart also substituted Niels Bohr and Henri Becquerel with Ernest Rutherford, thus correcting an error in the first edition. Henry Ford was also promoted from the "Honorary Mentions" list, replacing Pablo Picasso. Finally, some of the rankings were re-ordered, although no one listed in the top ten changed position.

Hart wrote another book in 1999, entitled A View from the Year 3000,[3] voiced in the perspective of a person from that future year and ranking the most influential people in history. Roughly half of those entries are fictional people from 2000–3000, but the remainder are actual people. These were taken mostly from the 1992 edition, with some re-ranking of order.

Originally posted by mekhanics
reply to post by ollncasino

 

Remember what jesus said :

"I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword"(Gospel of Matthew 10:34)

I'm not a Christian.

Incidentally, I am aware that in the vast majority of Islamic nations I would be prosecuted and quite possibly executed for my criticism Islam.

reply to post by ollncasino



I'll see you in birmingham

Originally posted by ollncasino

Originally posted by cenpuppie

How is this any different than the crimes the West perpetuates against them? Two wrongs don't make a right no matter how hard you try.

What crimes would those be?

Considering that the Muslim Arab world was under the Islamic Ottoman Empire's rule until 1918 , one has to presume that theses 'crimes' exist only in your imagination.

Are you aware that the Ottoman Empire occupied Southern Europe until the end of the 19th century?



Here is a further map detailing when the Ottoman Empire lost its Middle East and European colonies. Bulgaria 1908, Albania, 1912, Crete 1898, Greece 1830.



This map shows that not only Europe but also Russia and India suffered Islamic invasion and occupation.



Europe, rather than perpetuating crimes against the Islamic world, was the victim of Islamic aggression for approximately 1,200 of Islam's 1,300 year history.

edit on 7-9-2012 by ollncasino because: (no reason given)

Wow just wow. And your post gets to stay ? If this is not extremely off topic than what the f is ? Your post is not alone off topic, it's idiotic aswell. If Ottoman Empire was an Islamic Invasion, why the f did the Ottomans conquer Islamic countries like Egypt? Egyptian - Ottoman war was a war between Muslims for the record. If Ottoman Empire was an Islamic Invasion, Europe would have been Islamic today. Hell, imagine what would have happend if Muslim countries at the time decided to invade Europe, not just the Ottomans/Turks..

This site is everything about denying ignorance, yet your posts reek of stupidity and ignorance

I received this email the other day. I think it fits well here

I've never heard it put this way.....plain and simple!!!

Many Muslims today are not happy!

They're not happy in Gaza
They're not happy in Egypt .
They're not happy in Libya
They're not happy in Morocco .
They're not happy in Iran
They're not happy in Iraq .
They're not happy in Yemen
They're not happy in Afghanistan .
They're not happy in Pakistan .
They're not happy in Syria .
They're not happy in Lebanon .

So, where are they happy?

They're happy in Australia .
They're happy in the UK .
They're happy in Canada .
They're happy in the US .
They're happy in France .
They're happy in Germany .
They're happy in Italy .
They're happy in Sweden .
They're happy in Denmark .
They're happy in Norway .
So……They're happy in every country that is not Muslim.

And who do they blame?

Not Islam.
Not their leadership.
Not themselves.
THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!
AND THEY WANT TO CHANGE THEM TO BE LIKE THE COUNTRY THEY CAME FROM WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY.

Excuse me, but have I missed something here?


Cheers

Steve
PS .... Sure hope Australia doesn't go down the path of Great Britain, Europe and the Scandinavian countries. They're being taken over from within. Even Ghadafi said Islam won't need to fight to conquer the world, all they will do is outbreed the locals in western countries (naturally this is paraphrased but the real meaning is clear)