It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Drala
In astrology the beginning is Aries Mar.21+...so just before Mar.21st last year(Ides of March interestingly)...was there a quake that could have or still might signal a major end to things?
Have you considered we are in the 21st century yet we will not use 2100 till we are through? We are in 2013...and we announce it afterwards....apocalypse's are strange things...if I told you this process of disharmony began in 84 would it start to make more sense to you?
Originally posted by POPtheKlEEN89
the mayan count has nothing to do with our calendar, the hypothesis takes the time "researchers" believe the calendar is pointing to and puts it in our "Gregorian" form, December 21st at 11:11 is the time of the winter solstice and that's what some researchers believe the calendar is referring to. if the calendar were moved forward a month it could just as easily be the date november 21st 2012, regardless of what we call the month though it is referring to the same astrological event.
Originally posted by POPtheKlEEN89
the mayan count has nothing to do with our calendar, the hypothesis takes the time "researchers" believe the calendar is pointing to and puts it in our "Gregorian" form, December 21st at 11:11 is the time of the winter solstice and that's what some researchers believe the calendar is referring to. if the calendar were moved forward a month it could just as easily be the date november 21st 2012, regardless of what we call the month though it is referring to the same astrological event.
Originally posted by youdontknowme
exactly, the mayan calendar was never referring to the "time" of Dec.21st 2012, but rather the event of that day. Which is the sun aligning with the dark rift or center of the galaxy. This is what the calendar was all about. It was never about a date.
In addition to a still vibrant scene of a king and his retinue, the walls are rife with calculations that helped ancient scribes track vast amounts of time. Contrary to the idea the Maya predicted the end of the world in 2012, the markings suggest dates thousands of years in the future.
Originally posted by superman2012
reply to post by sk0rpi0n
Well, the Mayans never factored in the leap years and never said Dec. 21, 2012. That conclusion was brought about by calculating how many years from the beginning of their calendar and correlating it to the current calendar.
Originally posted by winofiend
Originally posted by youdontknowme
exactly, the mayan calendar was never referring to the "time" of Dec.21st 2012, but rather the event of that day. Which is the sun aligning with the dark rift or center of the galaxy. This is what the calendar was all about. It was never about a date.
But dec 21 2012 is just when their calendar ends. Not the galactic alignment signalling the end of all life on earth as we know it.
If the mayans had simply made a 12 month calendar, instead of one that goes on for thousands of years, they'd just pop out to k-mart and buy a new one... not expect the world to blow up because the calendar ends!
Not only this, but people have found mayan mural that indicates there may be 17 baktuns, and we're expecting the world to end at the end of the 13'th.
In addition to a still vibrant scene of a king and his retinue, the walls are rife with calculations that helped ancient scribes track vast amounts of time. Contrary to the idea the Maya predicted the end of the world in 2012, the markings suggest dates thousands of years in the future.
news.nationalgeographic.com...