It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Green’s CWP Compressed Air Enclosed Wind Turbine completely eliminates the three massive blades seen on most wind turbines. Rather than waiting for the wind to turn a blade, Green’s device features a patented Inner Compression Cone Technology, which he claims will squeeze and compress the incoming air in order to create more power at the turbine.
“Our design does not have any external moving parts to hit the birds,” writes Green on his website. “Our unit is easy to see so the birds can avoid it, and all moving parts are internal. The blades are mounted behind the windsock and inner compression cone, therefore making them nonaccessible to birds. Also, our turbines make virtually no noise.”
According to Green, his design can be scaled up for commercial power production, or down for residential use. The CWP will soon be tested, improved upon, and manufactured by Sigma Design, so final judgement will have to be reserved for the birds themselves.
89-Year-Old Man Develops Bladeless Bird-Friendly Wind Turbine
. The blades are mounted behind the windsock
Originally posted by stirling
Now Chicago could run the whole north east......But for really BIGGG WIIND DC could power the whole country....
Throw a couple of those in the senate and it would make megawatts.......
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
89-Year-Old Man Develops Bladeless Bird-Friendly Wind Turbine
I think the birds have yet to prove his claim.It's not a foregone conclusion that the inner blades will cause less harm than the outer blades. Both designs have blades and predicting exactly how birds will behave amounts to an unfounded claim. It may in fact be more bird friendly but it would be nice to see this claim backed up.
final judgement will have to be reserved for the birds themselves.
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
Did they find alot of bird carcasses around these supposed aviary asassins?
I've seen no data but I can offer an educated guess. Since the funnel shape concentrates wind, these might work better in relatively low wind areas that may not have enough wind for the normal design to be efficient.
Originally posted by butcherguy
I didn't notice in the article how this new design stacks up against a conventional wind generator, as in wind speed needed to start it spinning or power output vs windspeed.